Thomson Reuters: As Good as Reese's? (TRI)

Thomson Reuters: As Good as Reese's?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Four months ago, financial news powerhouse Thomson Reuters (NYSE: TRI ) completed its merger of two very famous names. Now that these great tastes are together, let's delve into the second-quarter earnings report (released yesterday) and see if they taste great together.

But first, a caveat: This is not going to be an easy task. As a recently merged entity, Thomson Reuters (TR) leans heavily upon "pro forma" accounting of its results, and will probably continue to do so throughout at least the first year of its existence.

Regardless, in analyzing the results (today and in the future), I'm going to stick as much as possible to the GAAP numbers. Not because I don't trust TR, mind you. Heck, I depend on the company's various divisions to provide accurate data to any number of data sources I use -- McGraw-Hill's (NYSE: MHP ) Capital IQ subsidiary, Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO ) Finance, and Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT ) MSN, to name just a few. It's just that I prefer to use objective numbers when analyzing companies. As perhaps the world leader in providing objective numbers, I trust TR will understand. With that said, here are TR's numbers for the first half of 2008:

Sales grew 43%, clocking in at nearly $5 billion.
TR earned a 10.3% operating margin and a 7.4% net margin on these revenues.
Which worked out to $0.51 per share, diluted.

Now, $0.51 may not sound like a lot of profit for a $35 stock. If you run-rate that out through the end of the year, you'll find yourself staring at a 34 P/E for a company that most analysts don't expect to grow even 13% per year, .

The valuation is actually a bit better than that, though. You see, TR is a veritable cash machine, generating $824 million in cash profits over the past six months -- more than twice its net income. Run-rate the free cash flow out six months, and the stock comes back with a much more reasonable price-to-free cash flow ratio of 18.

Valuation
But even that number is a little rich for my taste, and the reason has only partially to do with the probable growth rate. There's also the fact that TR carries more than $7 billion in net debt. Basically, I just don't see a very big in the stock right now, so I'll be sitting on the sidelines for the time being, waiting for TR's price to come down to something a bit more reasonable.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Unlike Rich, the deep-value sleuths at Motley Fool Inside Value do see value in Thomson Reuters. For a counter to Rich's argument, pick up your free trial to Inside Value right here.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. Thomson Reuters and The McGraw-Hill Companies are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment icon found on every comment.