Will Obama's Stimulus Plan Work?

Recs

47

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

How will President-elect Obama affect your portfolio? Keep reading our special series for the lowdown.

The people have spoken: They're counting on Barack Obama to conduct the economy for the next four years. Unfortunately, the economy has spoken, too, and it's handing him an utter catastrophe.

Inflation. Deflation. Energy. Credit. Housing. President-elect Obama is about to inherit an economic mess … and you'd better believe he won't be sitting on his hands while things unravel. Heading into a 2009 that looks like it'll be an economic doozy, odds are we'll see some sort of stimulus package from the new administration before long.

Here are two major stimulus measures Obama has pledged, along with a few thoughts on the impact they'll have on the economy … for better or worse.

Energy rebates
Although his website doesn’t elaborate on who's eligible, President-elect Obama proposes $1,000 "emergency energy rebates" to offset rising energy bills, funded by windfall-profit taxes on oil companies such as ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM), Chevron (NYSE: CVX), and ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP).

Good idea? Americans seem to slowly be going broke. And oil companies are still making spectacular amounts of money, that's for sure.

Problem is, energy inflation is hardly a problem anymore -- it's energy deflation that's causing a ruckus. With oil now at $65 a barrel and sub-$2 gas in some regions, justifying rebates might be a tough sell -- especially to energy companies scrapping projects to deal with deflating prices.

Plus, the stimulus checks sent out earlier this year were distributed to 130 million Americans. Assuming the same 130 million are eligible for a $1,000 rebate, the measure would cost $130 billion. Now, in 2007, the top five U.S.-based oil companies made a combined $80.4 billion. So unless we're talking about tax rates over 100%, something doesn't add up.

Another unintended consequence of tagging rebates as "energy relief" is that it makes it easier for consumers to avoid conservation, which certainly doesn't help long-term. My guess is that if energy prices stay low, the plan will be scrapped, at least temporarily.

$50 billion for jobs
Obama also proposes a combined $50 billion to avert looming job cuts in vital industries. First, $25 billion would be allocated to prevent cuts in "health, education, housing, and heating assistance or counterproductive increases in property taxes, tolls or fees" at the state and local level. Additionally, $25 billion would go towards preventing cutbacks in infrastructure and school-related maintenance. Obama's website claims the measures could save 1,000,000 jobs that might otherwise be lost.

Will it work? For the specific industries it attempts to aid, of course. And most people can probably agree that sectors like health and education shouldn't be left unattended as the economy flounders.

But that certainly doesn't mean jobs will flourish in the coming years … hardly. $50 billion or no $50 billion, job losses are bound to start stacking up. Just recently, American Express (NYSE: AXP), GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK), and Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) all announced layoffs. Unemployment -- currently at 6.1% -- is expected to top 7% in 2009, the highest rate in 15 years.

The common denominator
I have faith that Obama's plans will ultimately bolster the economy in some way, shape, or form. We need all the help we can get -- and quickly. But as with most packages, funding those plans becomes the million … ahem ... trillion-dollar question.

Let's not forget that the mother of all stimulus packages -- the $700 billion financial bailout -- will temporarily bleed Uncle Sam's bank account in the coming year. General Motors (NYSE: GM) and Chrysler are begging at the teat, too. One estimate puts the amount of government borrowing this fiscal year (which ends in September) at more than $1.5 trillion -- more than 10% of GDP. At some point, the harms of borrowing insane amounts of money, even when it's desperately needed, outstrip the benefits.

Anyhow, congrats on your historic win, President-elect Obama. May the next four years' economic outcome turn out better than the previous four weeks'.

We're counting on you.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own a share in any of the companies mentioned in this article. GlaxoSmithKline is a Motley Fool Income Investor selection. American Express Company is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. The Fool owns shares of American Express Company, and has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Davej6655 wrote:

    The tax credits the energy companies recieve today are to promote investment here in the this country. If those go away, then what incentive does Chevron or Exxon have to spend Billions here when they can spend that money anywhere. If they are taxed for windfall profits, what would keep them here in the US. Most of their investments are in other counties already. Go ahead, tax them more and watch 1000's of jobs and current taxes move to other countries.

  • Report this Comment On January 14, 2009, at 9:36 PM, GrahamU wrote:

    The weak economy needs quick action, and that is the stimulus plan of President-elect Barack Obama all about. Just in case his stimulus plan fails, we still have payday loans to help during those times we are struggling to make ends meet. He calls it the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan.” The focal point of this plan is job-producing projects that can get started quickly. In addition, he says he is going to provide assistance for middle and low-income families, who are the ones who typically take out payday loans, and provide debt relief for students. He plans to do this through a form of tax cuts and he plans to invest in infrastructure such as bridges, roads and water mains. We’re going to need a huge dose of that stimulus plan to at least stabilize the U.S. economy in this deepening recession. If this plan succeeds, the number of people turning to <a title="READ Will Obama Stimulus Affect Payday Loans?" rev="vote-for" href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/01/06/will-obam... loans</a> will decrease and prosperity will be restored.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 11:21 AM, andys2i wrote:

    Will it work? It has to and really is there any other fiscal policy choices on offer. Looking at the details of the plan ( http://www.savingtoinvest.com/2009/01/obama-economic-stimulu... ) there is definetly some questionable projects (like $50M for STD awareness), but overall it does achieve its aim of trying to create millions of job and more importantly restore faith in the American people that the government is trying to do something!

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 11:34 AM, alczervick wrote:

    Seriously? Honest evaluations of even the infrastructure spending says it will have no impact until 2010. How about tax cuts? Work every time - gets the money right into the hands of people who can spend it or invest it to create jobs. If you depend on the Government rather than yourself, you will surely be disappointed. Ignorance is the most expensive commodity we have in this country, too many dupes still get their information from what has been proven beyond any doubt to be a corrupt media.

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2009, at 4:47 PM, janeqpatriot wrote:

    Tax breaks work every time? Really?...we've been cutting taxes for nearly 30 and what have the results been? How about a mountain of debt and a collapsed economy. Yet, congressman Boehn-head keeps calling for more of the same. How about a little mea cupla, congressman? You admit that liberal policies have been off the table for 14 years (CNBC 1-15-09) So, who exactly is responsible for the fallout of this "supply-side" Ponzi scheme republicans call an economic theory? Got any new ideas, congressman? Democrats do...

    for more visit: http://janeqpatriot.blogspot.com/

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2009, at 6:42 PM, Chaedon wrote:

    Well, its all depend on your opinions, when President Obama announced his Stimulus plan, I was stunned to unbelieve, how could it work.

    If you are aware off the late 1980s real estate bubble bursting in Japan, you know what I mean.

    Like President Obama thinks, Japan spent trillions of dollars on infrastructure projects trying to lift up the economy but led to the largest debt in the developed world, totaling 180 % of its 5.5 trillion economy, while failing to generate a convincing recovery. At that time, Japan just spent too much on increasingly wasteful roads and bridges and not enough in areas such as education & social services, which studies show deliver more bang for the buck than infrastructure spending. At the end, that spending did little more than sink Japan deeply into debt, leaving an enormous tax burden for future generations. So it makes more sense to cut taxes and let people decide how to spend their money than for the goverment to decide how to invest public funds, especially more roads and bridges, for what, good for the construction people though. As per Takehiko Hobo, a professor at Shimane University in Matsue said. "This obsession with building roads is a holdover from an earlier era". Thanks for reading.

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2009, at 11:40 AM, mill7760 wrote:

    where is the line by line information on the stymulus

    package and how many jobs each amount will provide.

    There can be no discussion unless we have all the facts.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 771874, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 6:32:35 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
GS $170.01 Down -2.82 -1.63%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
AXP $40.93 Down -0.21 -0.51%
American Express C… CAPS Rating: ***
GSK $41.53 Up +0.06 +0.14%
GlaxoSmithKline pl… CAPS Rating: *****
CVX $76.77 Down -0.57 -0.74%
Chevron Corp CAPS Rating: ****
XOM $74.38 Down -0.27 -0.36%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
COP $52.08 Down -0.48 -0.91%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: *****
GM $0.75 Down +0.00 +0.00%
General Motors Cor… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Bond rating agency: A bond rating agency is a firm that specializes in rating debt instruments. The usual firms include Standard and Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!