Starbucks, Inside Out

Recs

4

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

I'm a Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) shareholder, one who bought her shares just about a year ago and is now down some 60% on them.

When our stocks fall so much, we tend to step back and question whether we should hang on. I'd been wondering about Starbucks, but I also told myself that at least part of its downfall has been due to the economy instead of anything the company is doing. When we're in a recession, $4 coffees and pastries don't seem like necessities.

And sure enough, Starbucks isn't the only provider of high-end treats that's been suffering lately. Shares of Tiffany (NYSE: TIF) have fallen by about 50% so far this year, while Coach (NYSE: COH) is down 34%, and Nordstrom (NYSE: JWN) is off 68%. Starbucks competitor Peet's Coffee & Tea (Nasdaq: PEET) is down about 24%.

Given the pessimistic outlook for luxurious brands in the near future, I turned to a book and a website to help me decide whether I should sell or hold on.

The book
First, I read Michael Gates Gill's book, How Starbucks Saved My Life. In it, a laid-off advertising executive, desperately trying to make ends meet, ends up working at Starbucks -- and loving it. I found the book honest and inspiring, both about the resilience of the human spirit and about the good intentions a company can have.

I learned a bunch of interesting things about how Starbucks is run. For instance, the company expects employees (called "partners" and given benefits such as stock and health insurance -- even if they're only part-time) to "connect" with customers (called "guests"), by making conversation and trying to eventually learn their names. Secret shoppers are regularly sent to stores, to see how the partners are treating their guests.

I walked away impressed with the company and its ideals. The company's focus on connecting with its customers is encouraging -- it can be enough to keep many folks coming back, even in hard times.

The website
However, in scanning the Web for comments about the book, I ended up at the starbucksgossip.typepad.com blog, where I found a host of current insights into the company, following its not-so-pretty quarterly earnings report.

For example:

  • Many bitter, cynical employees posting on the blog say they're being overworked lately, because of cost-cutting at the company.
  • Store managers are reportedly being allocated less "non-coverage time," which is time they're not working behind the counter, when they tidy up the store, manage schedules, and tend to other details.
  • Employees are worried about keeping their jobs because they're apparently being asked to do more work in the same amount of time and are being held to the same standards as before.

Altogether, the site left me troubled. Contented baristas are a key component for Starbucks to deliver the service that its customers expect.

A verdict
I like Starbucks' focus on customers. That trait that has helped other companies, such as Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN), prosper, as they react to what customers buy and suggest other merchandise they may like. Even McDonald's (NYSE: MCD) is customer-centric -- it has designed its menu to meet consumer demands, such as some healthier fare, higher-quality coffees, and low prices. Starbucks is also innovative. It frequently introduces new offerings and retires ones that get less love. Innovation, including a willingness to move in new directions, has served many successful companies well.

But if the blog is representative of many employees' feelings, then Starbucks is not effectively getting the rationale for its strategies across to its workers. If it has no choice but to make working conditions tougher right now, and it conveys that message successfully, then more workers might give it the benefit of the doubt. In the meantime, though, customers are being served and the economy is likely to recover -- eventually -- and when it does, it will bring with it more dollars for fancy drinks. So I'm not freaking out.

If I rank my holdings by my confidence in the company, Starbucks is not near the top, so I may still end up selling when I want to buy another stock. But for now, I'm holding on.

What should you do? Well, in times like these, some folks don't engage in much deliberation and simply sell, in a panic -- but that's not a sound approach. Whatever you do, don't be rash. But if you've decided you want to sell, and you're looking for some promising, undervalued companies, I invite you to test-drive -- free for 30 days -- our Motley Fool Inside Value newsletter service.

See what my colleagues think:

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Starbucks, 3M, General Electric, and McDonald's. Sotheby's is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems pick. Starbucks and 3M are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. Starbucks, Coach, and Amazon.com are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. The Fool owns shares of Starbucks. Try our investing newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 23, 2008, at 11:48 PM, GirlScoutDad wrote:

    Interesting, but it doesn't strike me as particularly revealing to note that employees in a retail and/or restaurant line of work feel overworked and frustrated. Can you find a retail or restaurant business anywhere with line employees who are generally happy and contented?

  • Report this Comment On December 25, 2008, at 12:37 PM, Ettanindraco wrote:

    Hmmmm.....

    Overall...a very interesting article however I feel that a major point is overlooked...

    In down markets, instead of considering who we are going to cut from our portfolios we should be saying to ourselves, "What companies do I want to own (stocks) now that they are on sale (reduced share price)?

    Back to the Starbucks (SBUX) example. This company has made a name for itself purely on the concept and the experience of getting a great cup of coffee, while being treated with legendary service. Like many other companies, they are having to "do more with less" or as I prefer to state "rely on your strengths to reach the summit". Let's face it...in good economic times, people find themselves in employment that really isn't suited to their strenghts where they just skate by. It is when the environment changes and a person is asked to ante up that the true measure of their strengths and commitment to an organization can be seen. Oftentimes, it is these individuals who become the loudest critics of their companines. In the case of Starbucks, the descriptions and comments are not indicative of the majority of partners...instead it is merely commentary by those who are unable to embrace change...

    It is my opinion, that any person who is relying on down performance (in a recession???) and is drawing on references that are not render a true snapshot of a companies culture is being extremely short sighted. Case in point, look to Apple's past and you will see a similar story.

    As for me, Starbucks is a company to watch in 2009 and will be added to my portfolio.

  • Report this Comment On January 27, 2009, at 12:33 PM, ManthriSrinath wrote:

    I want to make several points.

    First, making conversation with people and learning their names is normal societal behavior. You don't have to stand behind a fake espresso machine and overcharge people for sugar to accomplish this. Ask your parents. They'll confirm this.

    If they were really partners, I would expect them to all be on that new corporate jet with Howard Schultz, flying to Hawaii. No, I think in this context, "partner" is a condescending term designed to make minimum wage employees fell more important than they really are.

    That health insurance is great PR. What they don't tell you is that they go out of their way to make sure only a small percentage of employees receive the hours required each week to qualify for it. My coffee business also offers excellent health care to staff. And we don't play games with people's hours to make sure they can't get it.

    Lastly, Starbucks still makes awful coffee. It starts when they tell you that their coffee beans "expire" a year from the roast date. And it goes downhill from there.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 799823, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 7:54:48 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:02 PM
TIF $42.68 Down -0.53 -1.23%
Tiffany & Co. CAPS Rating: *
MCD $63.25 Down -0.35 -0.55%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
SBUX $21.90 Up +0.47 +2.19%
Starbucks Corp CAPS Rating: **
JWN $33.45 Down -0.57 -1.68%
Nordstrom, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
AMZN $135.91 Up +4.17 +3.17%
Amazon.com, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
PEET $32.56 Down -0.37 -1.12%
Peet's Coffee & Te… CAPS Rating: **
COH $34.75 Down -0.54 -1.53%
Coach, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Venture capital: Venture capital is funding and/or other resources provided to a start-up business.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!