How to Profit From Obama's Stimulus Bill

Everyone's talking about how investors can profit from Obama's stimulus plan. $787 billion is a heck of a lot of money, and, frankly, I want my share.

But this stimulus bill is far more difficult to take advantage of than people might realize. When you drill into the package, the opportunity isn't as clear-cut as it initially appears.

The real number
To start with, the headline number isn't really a useful number when it comes to looking for targeted investment opportunities.

The $43 billion for unemployment and welfare benefits and $20 billion for food stamps will stimulate the economy as a whole, but not any particular company. Similarly, unless your kid's teacher is willing to sell you a portion of their salary, the $87.3 billion going toward education doesn't lead to natural investment opportunities.

The same goes for most of the $253 billion in tax cuts and credits. The tax cuts will help the economy, but other than the $6.6 billion in homebuyer credits, the $1.7 billion in auto credits, and the $26 billion in renewable energy credits and loans, the tax cuts aren't targeting particular sectors. The homebuyer and auto credits are completely trivial compared to the size of the markets, and therefore do not offer investment opportunities.

The renewable energy stimulus is more interesting. But, oil is down from over $140 to $45. Does anyone really believe that a $26 billion government handout will come close to having the stimulating effect that $140-a-barrel oil did on the renewable energy industry? An investment in renewable energy companies needs to be based on oil prices, the worldwide regulation of carbon emissions, or our long-term energy needs -- not a one-time stimulus package.

Profiting from the sick
Health-care spending seems to have some potential, with $86.6 billion going toward Medicaid and $24.7 billion toward discounted health insurance for laid-off employees.

But we already pour over $2.1 trillion into health-care annually, so it's hard to see how an extra $111.3 billion across the entire industry will have much of an impact on any individual company. In fact, large health insurers like UnitedHealth (NYSE: UNH  ) and Aetna (NYSE: AET  ) may be hurt. The people most likely to pay for health insurance after losing their jobs are those who are most likely to need health insurance. So, while UnitedHealth and Aetna may pick up customers, they may be unprofitable customers.

Infrastructure is out
Those categories alone account for almost two-thirds of the stimulus package. The $175.9 billion in infrastructure spending is a large chunk of what remains. In normal times, you could profit by buying pick-and-shovel companies like Caterpillar (NYSE: CAT  ) .

But that's hard to do in this case, because we're coming off a real estate bubble. In December, residential construction was down $94 billion year over year, while the architecture billing index -- which tends to lead commercial construction spending by nine to 12 months -- has plunged to record lows. All the equipment that was used to build office buildings will be redeployed into building roads and bridges. The stimulus bill won't come close to replacing lost business for Caterpillar, which is why it's been laying off workers.

That's the story with a lot of the infrastructure spending. The $11 billion for the smart electricity grid should help companies from General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) to Siemens (NYSE: SI  ) . Even Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) is writing software for monitoring electricity use. But many of the companies in the space are huge conglomerates, and the $11 billion is unlikely to put a dent in the business these companies have lost as a result of the economic slowdown.

The best opportunity
To make for a good investment opportunity, the stimulus money must be targeted and significant relative to the size of the company. What's more, the stimulus bill shouldn't simply replace a fraction of the revenue that the company will lose as a result of the slowing economy, as is the case with a lot of the infrastructure spending.

The best opportunity may lie in the $19 billion that the government is allocating to health-care information technology (IT) systems. Cerner (Nasdaq: CERN  ) , a leader in electronic medical records, could be one of the best opportunities. Cerner's annual revenues are about $1.7 billion, so even a fraction of the $19 billion can potentially make a huge difference to Cerner's bottom line.

Even better, the investment in health-care IT should provide advantages to Cerner long after the stimulus plan is gone. The more doctors who use electronic medical records, the more value there is in integrating hospitals and medical devices into the system. Thus, there is a natural networking effect in health-care IT that should benefit Cerner.

The Foolish bottom line
While Cerner looks like a great opportunity because the short-term stimulus should lead to long-term competitive advantages, picking stocks based on government stimulus is a challenging game. From the start, it's difficult to predict which companies will benefit from government spending, and after the stimulus is spent, its positive effects recede. Generally, a better strategy is to focus on cheap companies with long-term competitive advantages.

In this market, there are many opportunities to buy great companies at cheap prices -- businesses that don't need a stimulus package to be successful. In fact, our Inside Value team thinks that right now marks the best time to buy excellent businesses since we started the newsletter. If you want to see why, you can read about our top picks with a free trial.

Fool contributor Richard Gibbons still isn't feeling stimulated, and requests that the government give him money. He owns shares of UnitedHealth and Google. UnitedHealth is both a Motley Fool Inside Value and Stock Advisor pick, as well as a Fool holding. Google is a Rule Breakers recommendation. The Fool's disclosure policy gets its stimulation by administering small electric shocks to writers who accidentally violate the policy.


Read/Post Comments (11) | Recommend This Article (57)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 27, 2009, at 4:59 PM, catoismymotor wrote:

    Richard,

    Thank you putting this article together. Like many thousands of fellow Fools I've been trying to read the political tealeaves from DC. I have to admit to being disappointed by the offerings presented by the Obama administration. As a result I have to focus on the stimulus packages offered by other countries like China. St. Buffett advocates only investing in what we understand best. Those kinds of projects, for me, are found in other countries.

  • Report this Comment On February 27, 2009, at 5:11 PM, FinancialFellow wrote:

    Until the details of the new health care plan are made available I think it's hard to say whether or not the stimulus plan will give a boost to health care companies. New rules and regulations could wind up hurting them more than helping.

    In case you are looking to find out how the stimulus package may benefit you directly, as opposed to grow companies you may want to invest in, this article provides a good summary: http://financialfellow.com/2009/02/23/whats-in-it-for-me-the...

  • Report this Comment On February 27, 2009, at 5:28 PM, PPDX wrote:

    Intresting no mention of Athenahealth, isnt it in the same area? Athenahealth stock dropped today -25% today! Friday feb 27th.

    ---Have yet to find out why but no doubt CEO Bush (cuz) will be on TV pimping his company and his stock options quickly

  • Report this Comment On February 27, 2009, at 8:16 PM, lefty543 wrote:

    The person who wrote this article is more than a fool he is an idiot. He made comments about the construction industry and what machines are used for what jobs. His comments are so silly that I won't even refute each one. He obviously never spent much time around earthmoving, mining and construction and has no knowledge of the industry.

  • Report this Comment On February 27, 2009, at 10:35 PM, drewsands wrote:

    Google's day is coming. Write a program to monitor the electrical grid. That is funny. They have not done anything except for there search engine tech and adwords. that is it. The rest is garbage. Nothing else innovative will ever come out of google anymore. Buy TAN it will blow the doors off of Google.

  • Report this Comment On February 28, 2009, at 3:46 AM, SockPuppetMan wrote:

    Profiting off a heap of dung can be difficult. Unless you are comrades with Stalin Jr., a.k.a. President OBAMA!, you can not.

  • Report this Comment On February 28, 2009, at 4:20 AM, sunnyspain wrote:

    Richard:

    What I missed from your overview is a comment on the clean energy sector. Are their not opportunities these both becuase R&D spending subsidies and the the commercialization will be focused on US based companies? Appreciate your view on this.

  • Report this Comment On March 02, 2009, at 4:13 AM, RahulGoel wrote:

    Brilliant article!

  • Report this Comment On March 02, 2009, at 11:29 AM, kartha1 wrote:

    How to profit from trouble is the essence of being vultures as opposed to displaying the human values.

    Good, as investors, we will look elsewhere when it comes to our money & possessions. There is no sense of sacrifice for the larger good. Otherwise, we will be labeled communists or socialists.

  • Report this Comment On March 02, 2009, at 12:22 PM, Healthconsult wrote:

    As a Healthcare IT consultant, I would strongly suggest NOT putting your money into Cerner. Their market share is being quickly eaten up by a privately held HIS called Epic Systems.

    There are only a few large players in the Health Information System arena, I would be surprised if Cerner doesn't fade away like McKesson, IDX/GE and Siemens.

  • Report this Comment On March 08, 2009, at 2:26 PM, HurricaneJohnson wrote:

    In other words, be finacially paralyzed.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 841243, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/22/2014 9:58:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement