Recs

23

I Blame Warren Buffett

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Folks love to point fingers.

When it comes time to pin the blame for the country's economic woes, there is no shortage of answers. Aggressive mortgage brokers may have been the early scapegoats, but now the net is cast ambitiously wide.

Liberals blame conservatives for lax regulatory oversight. Conservatives blame liberals for fears of nationalization. Turn on the TV, and talking heads will trash talk Wall Street greed, fraudulent money managers, and outlandish compensation models. Turn off the TV, and everybody else faults the media for fear mongering.

Let me pin the tail on the person you would least likely expect to be the fall guy. My modest proposal? Let's blame it all on Warren Buffett.

Say it ain't so, WB
Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK-A  ) (NYSE: BRK-B  ) charismatic leader has no problem absorbing criticism. He's humble. He's endearing. He's so easy to root for.

However, he's also not perfect. As an investor, Buffett is coming off his worst performance -- in absolute terms -- during his 44 years at the helm of Berkshire Hathaway. Sure, he beat the market, but only because he bled less.

He owns up to his mistakes. In discussing his unfortunate decision to buy into ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP  ) when he did, Buffett concedes that "the terrible timing of my purchase has cost Berkshire several billion dollars" in his latest annual shareholder letter.

It's more than that, though. Berkshire Hathaway's book value fell by 9.6% in 2008. There are 14 stocks in which Berkshire Hathaway has stakes worth at least $500 million, but positions that make up less than 20% of the respective companies. Half of those closed out the year worth less than the amount of money that Buffett has put in. If Buffett can't win in this market, and he's arguably the greatest investor of our generation, how do we stand a chance?

Curses to you, Buffett. Your mortality is a sharp pin, piercing the poorly inflated balloon we call confidence.

Calling bottom moves your name to the top
The Oracle of Omaha isn't perfect. No one is. However, his actions in September and October of last year may be interpreted as either signs of calling a market bottom or igniting premature optimism. He did a lot of things at the time:

  • With most of the country rallying against government bailouts, Buffett became one of their more vocal supporters.
  • Berkshire Hathaway purchased a $5 billion stake in Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) , and followed with a $3 billion chunk of General Electric (NYSE: GE  ) . Buffett's no dummy. His investment came in the form of high-yielding preferred stock, with warrants to cash in any potential common stock gains. However, the investors that followed him into these blue chips didn't have the same kind of low-risk luxury. They bid up the common stocks, which trade lower -- and in GE's case, considerably lower -- today.
  • On Oct. 16, The New York Times ran an op-ed piece by Buffett -- entitled "Buy American. I Am" -- urging readers to snap up shares of stateside companies. The market rallied, with the S&P 500 closing at 946.43 that day. It has gone on to shed 28% of its value.

"Let me be clear on one point: I can't predict the short-term movements of the stock market," he wrote, giving himself a little wiggle room. However, beating the "long-term investing" drum doesn't excuse him from arriving unfashionably early with his buy advice. The S&P 500 now has to climb 38% just to make up for the 28% slide (and, no, that's not a typo -- do the math).

The Buffett list
One can argue that Buffett isn't enough to save the market. It's not as if he can take GEICO or Dairy Queen public, priming the dry well of IPOs that pad investment banking coffers and get investors excited about the market. It's not as if he can write another influential op-ed column, because investors are still stinging from the last one.

He is the antithesis of the greed that corrupted bankers and the abusive power that defines the media. Buffett, by all accounts, is a pretty amazing guy. However, when the market needed a cleanup hitter to step up to the plate and clear the bases last fall, he whiffed.

Instead of buying stakes in dependable bellwethers, Berkshire Hathaway appears to be positioning itself as a loan shark of last resort to desperate companies like Tiffany (NYSE: TIF  ) and Harley-Davidson (NYSE: HOG  ) . Those are two of his more recent investments, yet they too hit fresh lows last week. Again, Buffett's investments are secured by chunky yields that won't blow up in his face unless the companies go under. The problem is that investors who initially bid up these companies once they see the Nebraskan wave his wand are seeing their faith in our country's greatest stock picker erode with every downtick.

So am I really blaming Buffett for the market's doldrums, or was this all just a Jonathan Swift send-up to show that Buffett is still the greatest? At this point, I fear that I may have even confused myself. I guess my expectations of Buffett were so high when he was Mr. October, pointing at the fences.

Why did he have to be so mortal?

Some of Buffett's other greatest hits:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Berkshire Hathaway is a Motley Fool Inside Value and a Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz enjoys the wit behind every single one of Buffett's annual shareholder letters, but he does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. He is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:08 PM, Hoxsie454 wrote:

    Back in 1963, when I was debating where to put my first $400 investment, I fretted over a little low priced thing called Berkshire Hathaway run by Buffet or a number called Amtel, run by Roy Little. I bought Amtel and made 50% on my money in short order.

    I was hooked on the market, for life!

    Bufet has routinely made these wise moves, while most of us have had to claw our way up the investment cliffs, ducking the rocks loosening and falling all around us. So, we had better listen to the maestro, He has wisdom. Its time to buy America!!

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:11 PM, 101448 wrote:

    I Blame Motley Fool for my losses is Capital Source as well as Southern Copper. They always said buy-buy-buy, now that these stocks are trading for about 10% of their original values what does Motley Fool say? Nothing. Cancel your subscriptions with them their advice is completely worthless.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:12 PM, 101448 wrote:

    I Blame Motley Fool for my losses is Capital Source as well as Southern Copper. They always said buy-buy-buy, now that these stocks are trading for about 10% of their original values what does Motley Fool say? Nothing. Cancel your subscriptions with them their advice is completely worthless.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Madgear wrote:

    101448 you are completely off the mark IMO. They make suggestion and imply & such but it's really your decision on what is it to do. I treat this website for what it is, and interesting read & random suggestions.

    Nobody put a gun to your head, so put the blame into perspective.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:31 PM, JGBFool wrote:

    101448 subscribed to the Motley Fool Gun to Your Head newsletter, where they do, in fact, force you to buy their monthly picks.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:33 PM, aggie9711 wrote:

    Buffett is not the genius everyone makes him out to be. He's either ignorant, a fan of Socialism, or is the type of connving executive that the Democrats he supports love to hate. His CNBC interview was ridiculous: Obama's plans are bad for the economy, and won't work (card check, etc) but we should still support him. Right. I honestly think he's rooting for further falls (much like I believe our current administration does) to give him more opportunities to invest in debt that would make Vinnie the loan shark look like a saint.

    He's James Taggart sucking up to Orren Boyle.

    I lost a bunch on Capital Source too, but I chalk a lot of that up to my own greed, with blame to share with MF.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:46 PM, bukaka wrote:

    Dudes I blame the lazy cheezy poof eating, sloth, apthetic, Fat, Lazy,TV watching, losers we have in this country!

    911 was an inside job played out on TV to take your constution away!!

    Wake up FATZO

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 2:48 PM, engr511185 wrote:

    I blame the mortgage mess which I blame on the real estate brokers which I blame on the real estate agents.

    Blame the real estate agents? Yes, they are the industry salespersons. Without them sales are not made. When you make a sale and know the person cannot afford the item, you are to blame. It is not ethical.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 5:44 PM, bigredchet wrote:

    The only error here is yours. Assuming WB's investments in GE & GS (exhorbitant yielding preferreds with option to convert to common), was the same thing as buying common because "WB must be *implying* the bottom is in."

    He put his billions into deals that are going to provide him good returns with little downside. Inferring that you or I could buy common & expect the same result... that's *foolish* with a lower case *F*

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 9:25 PM, EconomicWatchdog wrote:

    It is funny how the so called “Financial Oracle" is theorizing about the economic crisis and how to save the economy. Where was Warren Buffet in 2007? How much did he lose in this crisis? I think we should listen and learn only from those who warned us. They are the true Oracles who saw the crisis coming before the rest. I recommend you research Peter Schiff, Med Yones, Nouril Roubini, and Nassim Taleb. These experts tell it as it is, simple and clear. I read a special report on the economy. It predicted the crisis in jan 2007 and provided solutions that were ignored by the pervious Bush Administration and the current Obama’s economic team. Instead our politicians use the crisis as an excuse to design stimulus and aid programs to support special interests (investment banks) and for partisan political gains. It does not take a genius to see the truth, all it took me is 30 minutes to read this non-partisan report by Med Yones, one of the experts who predicted the crisis: http://www.ceoqmagazine.com/2009Q1/economics/useconomicrisis...

    According to the report, if Obama takes the recommended reform steps, we could see the economic recovery as soon as 2010/2011 ..if not, then we could get into another great depression era.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 9:32 PM, Rasbold wrote:

    Every generation, every age, every culture; there is always one who is the BEST at what he does. Tiger Woods, Michael Jordan, Bill Gates, the guy who marketed VHS (which is technological inferior to BetaMAX in every regard), and yes, Warren Buffett.

    Warren Buffett is the best, no question, but blame?

    I blame myself. When it was high, so was I. So were we all.

    Like the song says, "We're all to blame, we climbed so high, from pride to shame, we want it all. Everyone wants it all with no...SACRIFICE!!" (Loud heavy metal follows)

    We all F'ed it up, especially the Fed! But all. You and me, dude. There is no escape. Now we pay the price for our lack of forsight and why?

    To do it all over again.

    Good Luck, and May Your Dow Never Jones!

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 11:05 PM, PacificGatePost wrote:

    OBAMA’S KNOWLEDGE GAP

    Unfortunately Obama is showing the gap in his understanding of critical elements at the core of what drives America.

    http://pacificgatepost.blogspot.com/2009/03/obama-third-tell...

    This administration does not understand that business and capitalists are not its enemies.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2009, at 11:24 PM, cautiouswillie wrote:

    Instead of whinging about Buffett, I did what he does. I bought high yielding (23% and up) pref. shares. This way I can make Buffett-like returns while I wait for the rally. It's easy to be patient (like the man says we should be) if I'm getting 20% in cash to invest in other stuff.

    Example: LHO-G $7, 25.9% yield with ample coverage. They're there, just need to look...

  • Report this Comment On March 10, 2009, at 10:21 AM, mikecart1 wrote:

    Blaming Buffet is like blaming Jordan for missing a crucial shot in a game. Usually they win but that 1 time they miss, that some how makes them horrible at what they do. This article seems to be written by someone drinking hatorade and is jealous of Buffet's wallet.

  • Report this Comment On March 10, 2009, at 2:31 PM, JamieCK wrote:

    Warren Buffet didn't tell people which stocks to buy in his op-ed piece, and he is always very clear that he uses a long-term focus on stocks (at least 10 years) . So if someone truly followed his advice (BOTH buying AND holding) then it is much too early to be upset about the outcome of that advice because the second part (hold for 10 years) has not yet come to fruition.

    People always try to emulate WB, but they shouldn't confuse applying his approach with copying his actual stock picks. The average investor can't just buy the stocks that WB buys, because he makes decisions for reasons that are unique to Berkshire's situation. The capital that an individual investor is using to invest in stocks is on a much smaller scale than Berkshire's cash holdings (presumably, anyway. If that's not true for you, then I salute you!!!).

    Secondly, because WB has so much capital in a time that credit is scarce, he gets premiums on his money. The GE deal will earn him a guaranteed 10%. Ample return, no risk. And for those seeking to question why he should get all the good deals? Call it a reward for his disclipline in not squandering all of his cash like so many other companies did.

    In other words, if more people had listened to WB all along, then maybe we wouldn't be in this mess. I have little doubt that the same will be true when people retrospectively analyze his current message.

  • Report this Comment On March 10, 2009, at 4:06 PM, EdgarJunkie wrote:

    Buffett's preferred stock moves were great for him. Anyone who buys common equity because the company just sold a huge amount of high-yield preferred to a powerful capital firm deserves their inevitable losses!

    These instruments may enable the companies to survive or grow, but by their nature they decrease the value of common equity. Shame on "investors" who didn't understand this, apparently including the author.

    In the end, Buffett's editorial will appear prescient, as he usually does when he is mocked. His inflation warning in particular is not to be taken lightly!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 847149, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/14/2012 5:46:47 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,874.04 72.81 0.57%
S&P 500 1,351.77 9.13 0.68%
NASD 2,931.39 27.51 0.95%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/13/2012 4:02 PM
GS $114.53 Up +0.41 +0.36%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
HOG $46.47 Up +0.38 +0.82%
Harley-Davidson, I… CAPS Rating: **
TIF $64.36 Up +0.48 +0.75%
Tiffany & Co. CAPS Rating: **
GE $19.07 Up +0.20 +1.03%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
BRK-A $119230.00 Up +1250.00 +1.06%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: ****
BRK-B $79.44 Up +0.65 +0.82%
Berkshire Hathaway CAPS Rating: *****
COP $72.81 Up +0.56 +0.78%
ConocoPhillips CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement