These Companies Will Get Better in a Recession

Recs

14

No one enjoys a recession. Sales, profits, and bonuses fall, and companies lay off employees. But for some companies, a recession may end up being one of the best things that could happen.

Really 
The headlines are dire, and for good reason. But even amid all the bad news, there's a simple fact that keeps being overlooked: Certain companies will increase the value of their franchises considerably in a recession.

But it's not every company that can turn a recession to its advantage. The ones that can are leaders in their industries -- companies with strong brands, higher margins, and prudent levels of debt.

How do they do it? Three ways:

  • Competitors go out of business.
  • Companies increase their earnings per share through share repurchases or acquisitions at bargain prices.
  • Continued internal investment leads to increased market share and productivity gains.

1) Becoming king of the world 
The most direct way a company can benefit from a recession is pretty simple: Competitors go bust. Best Buy will probably benefit from Circuit City's liquidation just like Toyota Motor would benefit if General Motors went under -- because removal of that supply from the market would increase demand for competitors' cars. Seeing companies go out of business isn’t pretty, but it helps stronger competitors.

2) Buying up value 
Share repurchases and acquisitions are another way value can be created. In a recession, asset values typically fall to historically low levels. A company with a strong cash position can scoop up its own shares or make acquisitions for very low prices.

This is beneficial because buying shares at low prices reduces shares outstanding. The same earnings over fewer shares equal higher earnings per share -- and, theoretically, a higher stock price.

For example, The Washington Post generated a mind-boggling amount of value for its shareholders in the 1970s when it (at Warren Buffett's suggestion) repurchased vast quantities of its shares at prices well below what it was worth. Similarly, buying a business at a depressed price can add to a company's earnings per share, and the lower prices mean there is more cash for shareholders -- and all of that means benefits down the road.

That's what MidAmerican Energy was trying to do when it agreed to buy Constellation Energy when the latter was having liquidity issues. MidAmerican agreed to buy the whole company for the bargain price of $4.7 billion, but the deal fell through when Constellation found someone willing to pay $4.5 billion for half of its nuclear power business.

Even though it didn't end up acquiring a quality asset on the cheap, MidAmerican stands to earn more than $1 billion on the $1 billion it initially lent to Constellation.

Having the flexibility to invest in one's own shares and those of distressed companies can give a company quite an edge.

3) Internal investment 
All businesses need to continually invest in themselves in order to improve. This is because investments in areas like research and development and productivity initiatives should lead to higher sales, lower costs, and hence, higher margins.

Yet in a downturn, less-well-off companies are forced to put off these expenditures because the more pressing need is to keep the business profitable. But companies with high operating margins and strong cash flows can continue to invest in themselves when times are bad, and therefore have opportunities to gain over their weaker competitors.

You can see this in the automotive industry. From 2002 to 2006, Toyota's operating margin ranged from 7% to 10%, whereas both Ford's and General Motors' ranged from negative 5% to 3%. Toyota's margins were higher because it invested heavily in automated production systems and lean manufacturing initiatives over many years and, as a result, was much better positioned to weather the current crisis than its American competitors.

Investing in yourself -- especially when your competitors can't -- usually leads to a payoff down the road.

Stick with the best 
Even recessions can be blessings in disguise for strong, well-run businesses -- but it takes some time for these blessings to become apparent. And that's why it's important to identify now the companies that will likely enjoy these advantages going forward.

To get us started, I ran a screen using CAPS, The Motley Fool’s 130,000-member investment community, for mid- and large-cap companies with large cash hoards and strong competitive positions; seven are highlighted. A large cash balance is one sign of a potential winning investment in an uncertain world, because it can protect the company against unforeseen difficulties or allow the company to play offense by buying back shares or acquiring competitors. 

Company Name

CAPS Rating (out of 5)

Market Capitalization (billions)

Current Price

Cash Per Share

Cash/Price

LT Debt-to-Equity Ratio

Sysco (NYSE: SYY)

****

 $13.8

 $23.34

$1.52

6.5%

74%

Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO)

****

$108.0

 $46.64

$3.06

6.6%

24%

Paccar (Nasdaq: PCAR)

****

$10.2

 $29.16

$5.58

19.1%

NA

Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC)

***

$104.6

 $23.45

NA

NA

NA

Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE: WMT)

***

$193.3

 $48.81

$1.68

3.4%

57%

Donaldson (NYSE: DCI)

***

$2.6

 $32.27

$0.99

3.1%

39%

Danaher (NYSE: DHR)

****

$18.8

$59.00

$3.06

1.7%

28%

Sources: Capital IQ and Motley Fool CAPS; data as of May 21.

At Motley Fool Inside Value, we're on the hunt for companies that are increasing their value even in the midst of this recession. If you'd like to see what we're finding, take a free, 30-day guest pass to get all of our recommendations, including our five best ideas for new money now, as well as a discounted cash flow calculator you can use to evaluate companies on your own. Just click here to get started -- there's no obligation to subscribe.

Already subscribed to Inside Value? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was originally published Feb. 15, 2009. It has been updated.

Fool analyst Andrew Sullivan does not own any of the shares mentioned. PACCAR and Best Buy are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Coca-Cola, Best Buy, and Wal-Mart are Inside Value picks. Coca-Cola and Sysco are Income Investor choices. The Motley Fool owns shares of Best Buy. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 8:19 AM, stockplus wrote:

    The Fools shamelessly find ways to promote junk food simply because some in their house of Fools own this stuff. Terrible.

    Social Responsibility. In US the health care costs are rising rapidly. We are facing new problems of diabetes in children. Why is that happening? It is no rocket science here. Answer is our eating habits and consumption/promotion of junk foods. Coke promotes its carbonated and sugary water which contributes to these health problems. Sometimes we weigh pros and cons of things. But in this case there is no positive side of this junk drink. Its promotion is depleting our pockets when we have to start putting kids on medicine for health problems. I can keep on going here but you got the point. We have to control junk food for a better life.

    From the investor’s point of view, we should exercise discernment. We should not encourage escalation of stuff that is hazardous to health.

    From the sole point of making money as well I have a point here. Mr. Buffett is a very wise man. I have very high regards for him for many reasons. That said, I don’t agree with him on his Coke’s holding. He has been holding 200 million shares of coke bought at a low base price. Actually he bought 25 million shares way back and the stock spilt in the nineties earned him his current pile. Health and diabetic problems in children were not that conspicuous at that time and people were touting junk foods like coke. The stock traded in the 80+ range in late nineties. IF Mr. Buffett had plainly dumped his coke holding at that time simply because of undue and irrational appreciation in price, and put that money in a money market account or certificate of deposit he would have done his Berkshire Hathaway shareholders a big favor. I think if he does it now, he may surely be ahead in 10 years. Awareness against junk is increasing. Simply sticking to silly philosophy in some cases is no good.

    Now we are facing challenges to control health costs and for this healthy living should be promoted. How much junk food and drinks should we consume? Coke’s management will not do anything to help the cause. Investors and consumers can certainly play a role and they MUST.

    Dump coke and discourage its promotion.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 9:05 AM, stockplus wrote:

    Many a time foolishness defies even laws of gravitation. In financially hard times, people do not stop brushing their teeth or stop shaving. They do not stop using toilet paper. So any positive comment about Procter and Gamble stands to reason. But there also one should look at other factors like growth rate etc. before putting money in. But eating and drinking junk is no logic. In fact, we should stay away from junk food and stay healthy so that we do not have to scrap the bottom of purses to pay for health problems. Bottom line: Fools’ promotion of coke is misplaced.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 9:48 AM, wuff3t wrote:

    stockplus,

    When discussing the morality of others it's probably best not to start by trying to impose your own. By all means offer your views on the financial worth of a stock but trying to tell people how they should or should not invest from an ethical standpoint is not your place. We can all make our own minds up what we believe in, thank you.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 10:48 AM, stockplus wrote:

    Investing in Coca-Cola. There are many ways to loose money even in so-called solid companies. A couple of these oft-repeated instances are:

    1) Buying a stock at a wrong time. Wrong time could involve potentially damaging news like failure of drug for a pharmaceutical company.

    2) Buying a stock at an inflated price in relationship to its future growth. This happened for coke in the late nineties AND it is the case even now. Historically (going back 40 years and starting from there), people made money in coke when they bought the stock at a multiple of less than 10 for its the then earnings. Now coke is a very mature company with no mentionable growth. (Proof: last decade). People can’t drink junk day and night. If the stock trades around 30 dollars a share now which is 10 times projected earnings, then one could hope to make some money by holding it for a few years assuming that rationality keeps prevailing. Gambling is totally a separate issue.

    In fair conclusion, leaving aside ethical comments on junk food, coke is overvalued and it does not deserve the current price.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 2:26 PM, madmilker wrote:

    People in America need to realize jus what got America in this shape…”cheap” yes so-call cheap items from a foreign land.

    quote*Wal-Mart firmly believes in local procurement. We recognize that by purchasing quality products, we can generate more job opportunities, support local manufacturing and boost economic development. Over 95% of the merchandise in our stores in China is sourced locally. We have established partnerships with nearly 20,000 suppliers in China. *end quote!

    Now! if there be 182 country’s making items for the world to buy and they have only 5% of the pie in China…duh! This company makes the nice people of China support their currency(yuan) by keeping it in their country working for the people there…. but with the “yuan” going up in value and the US dollar going down…all the foreign items that the American consumer buys thinking it is cheap has went up in price.

    People…its all about the currency and to keep a currency strong you got to keep it floating around the country you live in so it can work for you. For the past 12 years all them US dollars are being shipped overseas to a foreign bank and with the American worker not making anything for the foreigner to buy the “we the people” have to turn to the “second” largest employer in America(Uncle Sam) to sell “we the people” debt in order to get all them dollars back!

    50 years ago a foreigner would had given their left nut for a US dollar or a Hershey’s chocolate bar and today the same foreigner has got Uncle Sam and the American consumer by both all the while Hershey is moving the chocolate factory to Mexico. Wake up! America and think “MADE IN AMERICA.”

    quote*"Considering that there are over 30,000 ships at sea this morning," writes James Carlton, director of the Williams College-Mystic Seaport Maritime Studies Program, in an e-mail, "the total number of organisms and species in this global 'bioflow' on the morning your readers read your piece could be staggering - billions of individuals, and thousands of species."

    Indeed, scientists have long considered ballast water the primary way invasive aquatic organisms are introduced. From the zebra mussel's arrival in the Great Lakes, to an American jellyfish severely disrupting Black Sea fisheries, the potential costs of accidental introduction of a species to new homes can be tremendous. Aquatic invasives cost the US $9 billion yearly, according to estimates by David Pimentel, professor emeritus of ecology and evolutionary biology at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y. Zebra and quagga mussels (a cousin to the zebra) alone cost the $1 billion annually.*end quote!

    tat is $9 billion a year in hidden taxes to all Americans...

    cheap ain't chic and it cost America............jobs!

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 10:28 PM, catoismymotor wrote:

    What got us to this point was not a demand for cheap foreign goods. What got us to this point is 1) crushing taxes 2) socialist legislation that hinders small businesses 3) unions trying to kill their gold egg laying goose 4) unscroupulous lending practices 5) poor journalism 6) you and me for not questioning our leaders and demanding change.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 10:50 PM, soycapital wrote:

    "you and me for not questioning our leaders and demanding change."

    Very good point! Except you realize this is #1 reason.

    You know there are so many out there that whine and bicker and point fingers and engage in petty politics and all for naught.

    Sleep in your own bed folks, we made it for ourselves by not keeping watch over our country and let pride and greed (among others) get in the back door.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 11:30 PM, stockplus wrote:

    Failure of leadership reached a pinnacle when it did not whip the butts of AIG and Bank of America chiefs for giving bonuses out of tax payers’ bail out money. It is a disgrace on our system and we are heading for much worse mess than we have now. AIG and Merrill folks should have felt blessed just to receive their salaries. And they thought of bonus!!!

    Is this a first rate mockery of the system or what? I believe we are going into a real mess down the road. Let the damn inefficient bank go to hell. It is capitalism folks. Wiser will survive and thrive. All the nonsense about the world coming to an end if AIG had failed was garbage. Well, have we saved anything now? I don’t think so. We must make fundamental changes. Simply printing and pouring money onto greedy and incompetent institution is no solution.

    Our stock market could easily fall to a level half of where it is trading today. Printing too much money will lead to inflation down the road and big trouble is waiting.

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2009, at 8:33 AM, madmilker wrote:

    "catoismymotor"...red...oops! read slowly...

    quote*Now let us look at Wal-Mart again; you buy a product there, 6% goes to the employees, 10-18% is profit to the company, 25% goes to other costs and 50% goes to re-stock or the cost of goods sold. Of the 50% about 20-25% goes to China, a guess, but you get the point. Now then, how long will it take at 433 Billion dollars at year for China to have all of our money, leaving no money flow for us to circulate? At a 17 Trillion dollar economy less than 40-years minus the 1/6 they buy from us. Some say that if we keep putting money into our economy, it would take forever, but if we do not then eventually all the money flow will go. If China buys our debt then eventually they own us, no need to worry about a war, they are buying America, due in part to our own mismanaged trade, so whose fault is that? Not necessarily China, as they are doing what's in the best interests, and we should make sure that trade is not only free, but fair too.*end quote!

    http://www.worldthinktank.net/pdfs/TheFlowofTrade.pdf

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2009, at 8:58 AM, catoismymotor wrote:

    Unstabledairymaid, AKA: Madmilker,

    I...read...your...quote...very...very...very...slowly. I still believe that you are incorrect. I respect your opinion and appreciate your willingness to share your ideas with the group. Thank goodness that we do not have to agree to get along. Fool on!

    Sincerely,

    Cato

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 906120, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 1:00:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
WFC $28.40 Up +1.28 +4.72%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ***
SYY $27.44 Up +0.53 +1.97%
SYSCO Corp CAPS Rating: *****
DHR $72.55 Up +0.59 +0.82%
Danaher Corp CAPS Rating: ****
DCI $39.36 Up +1.19 +3.12%
Donaldson Company,… CAPS Rating: ****
PCAR $39.44 Up +0.76 +1.96%
PACCAR, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
KO $55.48 Up +0.99 +1.82%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
WMT $52.00 Up +0.75 +1.46%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Sector ETF: A sector ETF is an exchange-traded fund owning a range of stocks that are all in the same sector.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!