Recs

62

Up More Than 100% and Still a Bargain

In normal times, an unemployment figure hovering within spitting distance of 10% would be bad news indeed. These are far from normal times, of course, and the government's latest reading of 9.4% was taken as excellent news, with the stock market shooting up nicely in response. That's particularly remarkable given the months-long rally we've been on, an upswing that's seen the S&P 500 tack on more than 40% since hitting its March lows.

Cash for clunkers
The rally has been especially kind to distressed, profitability-impaired stocks like Motorola (NYSE: MOT  ) and Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  ) , each of which shed boatloads of free cash flow in fiscal 2008. If the recovery isn't as robust as the market seems to think it's going to be, financially weak stocks like those are likely to take a hard hit. Their fat year-to-date gains will be so much hot air let out of a helium balloon, leaving those investors left holding the bag talking funny when the skid hits the fan.

That's also true of student lender SLM (NYSE: SLM  ) and penny-stock broadcaster Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) -- two more iffy propositions that investors have bid up for reasons that …

Well, it's hard to think of a reason, actually. Yes, it's turned out that -- lo and behold! -- the end of the world wasn't nigh last fall. The apocalypse didn't occur in March, either. Still, with huge bullet holes in their financials, and anemic earnings-growth expectations to boot, these two jokers aren't even good for comic relief.

That's particularly true given that there's ample reason to believe that this recession may not be done with us yet. The recent relatively good unemployment news, after all, was preceded by grim figures on the retail front. Consumer spending, the linchpin of our economy, remains moribund. In the long run, it's good news that the savings rate remains high, but paying down debt doesn't stimulate the economy.

Dialing for dollars
Against that backdrop, one stock I have my eye on during these strange days is Sprint Nextel (NYSE: S  ) , which is up about 100% on a year-to-date basis.

Rocked hard amid the downturn, Sprint last paid a dividend in 2007, and it has posted negative net income during each of its last two fiscal years. At a glance, the company looks similar to the junk I trash-talked above. Yet one Fool's trash is another's treasure -- and Sprint looks like a diamond in the rough to yours truly.

At some level, after all, even flailing companies can make attractive investment prospects. Sprint isn't exactly flailing: It raked in more than $18 billion in revenue during fiscal 2008, and the company has been free-cash-flow (FCF) positive during eight of the last nine years. The sole miss occurred way back in 2001, and the last 12 months have seen a sharp FCF increase compared with 2008.

On the risk side of the ledger, I'm troubled by the company's recent debt offering. Yet even after factoring this fresh development into the analysis, Sprint appears to be trading at a steep discount to fair value. Indeed, using a normalized free-cash-flow figure and conservative estimates of earnings growth that account for Sprint's third-place status in a race that also includes Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) and AT&T (NYSE: T  ) , my back-of-the-envelope valuation for the company comes in at roughly $7.50 a share. As I type, Sprint currently trades near $3.80.

About that envelope
I didn't actually use one. I used the discounted cash flow (DCF) calculator that comes gratis with the Fool's Inside Value service instead. With pointers to the data you need, this no-muss, no-fuss tool comes in handy indeed when winnowing a field of contenders down to just those that appear worthy of further research.

And if you'd rather leave that work to others, not to worry: In addition to resources like the DCF tool, members have complete access to all of IV's recommendations. Each comes with "buy-below" guidance -- the price below which our advisors feel the stock is strong buy. That way, you'll know amid these strange and volatile days whether a recommended stock's price remains right. Click here to give IV a go. It's free to try, and there's no obligation to subscribe. 

Shannon Zimmerman runs point on the Fool's Duke Street and Ready Made Millionaire services, and he runs off at the mouth each week on Motley Fool Money, the Fool's fast n' furious podcast. A fresh edition of MFM hits iTunes each Friday, and you can listen by clicking here. (Link opens iTunes.) Sprint Nextel is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. You can check out the Fool's strict disclosure policy right here.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    How can you claim to bash a stock and not know why it gained over 1000 percent? See, thats your first mistake. You printed the wrong information. You see, as of today, SiriusXM is up 1000 percent from its lows. And you dont know why? Ok, Ill tell you why.

    1. It was priced for BK. That didnt happen.

    2. They received refinancing on the Liberty Deal, basically pushing out debt payments, and lowering interest rates.

    3. Two S&P credit upgrades. Incuding a new B- Corporate rating.

    4. Iphone release.

    5. Improved cash flow, and EBITA.

    6. Cash for clunkers.

    I have 52 more. Im not kidding. I can go on. Or have you been embarrassed enough?

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 3:48 PM, conwayguy2001x wrote:

    Excellent response Fredlee009! Kudo's!

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 3:52 PM, frackme wrote:

    They say that AT&T has the i killer. We'll let me tell you what Sprint has, they have the Boost killer. They will load Sprint up with massive Pre paid customers, that's what they do. Boost said to be opening more stores this year. Pre paid customers in this economy is golden baby!

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 5:00 PM, plange01 wrote:

    sirius is a great company but it doesnt make money and is living off loans from big investors. in the end it will fail regardless of its stock price...i was up over 1,000% on car this year and that company will be bankrupt in less than a year...

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 5:24 PM, fw190a8 wrote:

    If you Fool writers would have bought LVS stock when

    you started bashing it, you wouldn't have to write a bunch of junk to make a living. You could concentrate on something useful like...ah forget it.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 7:26 PM, SCWinehound wrote:

    I like SIRI for one reason more than all others. It's got a big a*s*s moat. It's a monopoly and a great business model in an era where consumers want their entertainment personalized. I don't see wannabe competitors launching their own satellites and replicating the line-up anytime soon.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 11:41 PM, flippatch wrote:

    Zimmerman and Motley Fool Editorial Management - you allow yourself and your writers to refer to stocks as "jokers" without any factual support. You should be ashamed of yourselves. This isn't a financial site, it's the equivalent of a low budget Hollywood tabloid.

    Stop looking to incite and start to inform. You are pretty high and mighty for a company that triple and quadruple recommended FMD and SCSS as your "paid publication" picks of the month.

    I won't list the myriad of improving financial metrics. Ieave that to your "reporters". How many companies have increased guidance in the last two quarters and will likely do it again next quarter? SIRI is one answer. Do some reporting...PLEASE.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 11:51 PM, QwertyHero wrote:

    Wow - There is nothing quite like the totally bewildering, unjustified, undeserved but rabid loyalty of the SIRI stock holder. It's totally unreal.

    Ya'll are crazy!!! Sirius sucks. Seriously.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 6:54 AM, thehynie wrote:

    The problem with valuing Sprint is that the company's balance sheet shows $38 billion in various kinds of debt, over $32 billion of the longer-term variety, against an equity capitalization of $10 billion. Running a DCF on the equity is a tougher game than crystal-ball gazing is normally, because you really need to start by valuing the enterprise, free of debt, then subtreacting the debt. And if the company is perceived by lenders to be a poor credit, future debt servicing costs and terms could begin lowering returns available to the common. It is difficult to do this exercise with great precision, so you need a massive margin of error.

    As far as your comment about being FCF positive in all but one year over the last decade or so, maybe so, but over the last three years they are 2 for 3, but total cash flow is a negative $5 billion. That paints a little different picture.

    The common is incredibly sensitive to changes in the outlook for the company debt. You could have made a similar argument a couple of years ago when the stock was at $7. But the debt outlook changed and the common plummeted. I'm not saying it's cheap or expensive, but I think you need to consider what you're really making a bet on. Better operating stats are only half the battle.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 11:01 AM, spr0949 wrote:

    I am not as astute an investor as many of you are, but as a Sirius/XM subscriber I will never willingly give that up. I LOVE it!! As an investor, after absorbing as many of the "Professional" analyses as I could find it seems that the stock should reach $1 by the end of the current quarter and reach $3 early next year, with plenty of upward potential beyond that. I have doubled my already significant holdings.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 11:14 AM, DownEscalator wrote:

    You might think Sirius is a great product, but in the end, it's a doomed endeavor for one simple reason: the market for it does not support the cost of the enterprise. The company does not - and, likely, will never - make money. They can have the biggest moat in the world, it doesn't make the idea any more feasible or profitable.

    Come up with all the hypotheticals you want about how it might grow, but their service has been on the market for a few years now and they're not making money. In tech, that's a sign of doom.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 11:29 AM, spr0949 wrote:

    Sorry, "DownEscalator", but you sound like a short-seller that is on the ropes.

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 12:03 PM, moneymog wrote:

    Up over 100% and definitely still a bargain!!!! CERS

    Fool recommended years ago and this fool is taking it to the bank.

    Thanks Motley!

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 3:16 PM, QwertyHero wrote:

    SIRIUS is DOOMED!!!

  • Report this Comment On August 20, 2009, at 9:31 PM, moneymog wrote:

    Not SIRIUS.

    The company is CERUS. Mega blood Intercept patents, $2 and no competition.

    Time to get Serious investing.

  • Report this Comment On August 22, 2009, at 6:10 AM, tonleong88 wrote:

    In Malaysia, we put heavily into SIRIUS and predict it will move up and not DOOMed. Bet u gud one to place heavy bid and become a millionare

  • Report this Comment On August 22, 2009, at 2:23 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    Never make money for years? First sub in 2002. Thats 7 years, with BILLIONS in start up costs. Sat. tv didnt make money right away either. No company that needs to install an infrastructure in the billions will ever make money quickly. People who dont understand this simple concept shoudnt be responding to financial articles, but they DEFINATELY should not be financial authors. SiriusXM will never make money. Really? Want to bet? I am currently betting that they will against the market right now. Guess what? Ive been winning for over 7 months now. Not a bad run. And counting. Up over 1200 percent now from its lows. Sorry author, I was wrong. It keeps going up, and making your article look even more stupid. 100 percent. LOL LOL

  • Report this Comment On August 22, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    stocsk up 100 percent since the market bottomed? who fricking cares. How about stocks up 1200 percent from when THEY BOTTOMED, you fricken terrible writer. Unless this is an article about SPY, i dont give a rats ass when the market bottomed compared to siriusxm bottoming. ITs kind of obvious when a stock bottoms, when it hits .07 cents on BK fears, that i knew was never going to happen. Write me an email author, and ill send you a screen shotof my .07 cent share purchase. Best purchase I ever made in my life. Your dishrag was telling me to sell at .07 cents. WOW. Thats evil advice!! Not bad advice, thats EVIL advice.

  • Report this Comment On August 23, 2009, at 3:13 PM, fattanker wrote:

    What is the point of paying to subscribe to TMF? All of their advertisements claim they will help you make money. Yet, they consistently miss huge short term opportunities while pushing stocks that may or may not be decent long term prospects. Individual stock picking (presumably why you would subscribe) lends itself to short term trading at higher risk for (hopefully) higher potential gains.

    The performance metrics TMF reference are always time-bounded to include positive performance; never including unfavorable time periods. Heck, I can show you some awesome periods in my portfolio, but who cares! It only matters when you buy and sell, not when you observed stock behavior.

    Regarding SIRI: TMF missed the boat, period. SIRI non-supporters: point taken on that company's long term issues. But how do these affect short term gains again? Publicized debt obligations due in 2013 do not affect next weeks share price; materiel news like earnings, new products, etc. do. TMF seems intent on ignoring these while focusing on long term issues. To bad for those who follow blindly. Their treatment of this stock leads me to question their motives as well as their credibility regarding any of their picks.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2009, at 1:03 PM, Mr5StarFool wrote:

    Sprint? People don't like Sprint. Nextel isn't a money maker. Apple will keep them at bay. Their technicals currently are on the verge of a short recommendation. Money flow is declining, earnings are declining, 50 day av. price has declined below the 200 day moving average...

    Anyone attempting to spin Sprint as a gem of any sort -relative to the myriad of other opportunities out there should know that their antics smack of a fledgling stockbroker after a mandatory Monday meeting where he is told that a deal has been struck with S, and that he better get his butt on the phone and move some S to his customer base ASAP. Lipstick comes to mind.

  • Report this Comment On August 25, 2009, at 12:43 PM, BigFatBEAR wrote:

    I agree with Mr5StarFool, S is plain junk.

    Buy TOT instead. It has a positive EPS, a reasonable P/E, a steady, predictable business, and it yields 5.5% per year. It is a MUCH bigger company than S, and has only half the total debt of S.

    Let's have a look at the long-term technicals: http://www.google.com/finance?chdnp=1&chdd=1&chds=1&...

    TOT spanks S. Nuff said.

  • Report this Comment On August 25, 2009, at 3:44 PM, TabCocovillea wrote:

    Completely laughable! Any real analysis being done on this site?

  • Report this Comment On August 27, 2009, at 11:14 PM, Wisenvestor wrote:

    Have you seen the growth of subscribers and revenue growth charts? It is like shooting a bullet from the bottom of a well. The well was deep, but that bullet is now just about to break ground level. It costs a lot to launch 8 satellites (and two spares). The costs after consolidation will continue to go down at the same time subscribers and revenues rise. Duplicate channels, programs, and satellites will be retired. The scoffers sound like the many who ridiculed other tech giants in the early days. World wide sales have barely begun & these satellites do circle the world my friends.

  • Report this Comment On August 28, 2009, at 5:31 AM, alkoholiks wrote:

    How do these idiots at fool.com even get hired? It's so obvious the majority of them are completely clueless.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 967355, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/27/2012 12:43:14 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
SLM $13.57 Up +0.01 +0.07%
SLM Corp CAPS Rating: **
T $33.69 Up +0.05 +0.15%
AT&T CAPS Rating: ***
VZ $41.45 Up +0.06 +0.14%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
SIRI $1.93 Down -0.06 -3.02%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
LVS $47.92 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Las Vegas Sands Co… CAPS Rating: ***
MSI $48.02 Up +0.30 +0.63%
Motorola Solutions… CAPS Rating: **
S $2.62 Up +0.09 +3.56%
Sprint Nextel Corp CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement