Recs

16

Is This Company About to Fail?

Just a few months ago, the credit market was exceptionally tight. In spite of (or perhaps because of) Uncle Sam's help, almost no company that actually needed a loan was able to get one from a private lender at decent rates.

In fact, those that could get money at all were forced to pay outrageous interest for the privilege. General Electric, for instance, is paying Berkshire Hathaway 10% on its preferred shares, and GE had to sweeten the pot with warrants to get its rate that low.

And GE is a profitable industrial titan -- once the world's largest company -- which, even after its recent downgrade, still sports an impressive AA+ debt rating. When a company like that needed to dilute its shares to get a loan at double-digit rates, you know the credit market was tight. Although it was difficult and expensive, GE could borrow the cash it needed to operate. But not everyone is so lucky.

Who's the most at risk?
The credit market remains tricky. And in a tricky credit environment, companies that can't either roll over their debt, or pay their debt and operate with what they have, are in danger of going under.

But with the possible exception of law firms that handle bankruptcies, nearly every company is feeling the pain of this economic downturn. So how can you tell whether a company is struggling just like everyone else -- or about to fail?

These three signs should make you sit up and take notice:

  • A substantial amount of debt -- given this credit market, a company with significant debt that it can't pay off is a huge risk for shareholders.
  • A negative tangible book value -- which means that its total worth is tied up in its brands, its goodwill, and its ability to generate cash, leaving nothing to borrow against.
  • Negative earnings -- which means that it hasn't recently been able to run its business profitably.

When you put all three of those high-risk signs together, you get companies like these:

Company

Tangible Book Value
(in Millions)

TTM Net Income
(in Millions)

Total Debt
(in Millions)

Boeing (NYSE: BA  )

($8,241)

($42)

$11,038

Boston Scientific (NYSE: BSX  )

($5,990)

($2,343)

$6,061

Cablevision (NYSE: CVC  )

($8,514)

($116)

$12,609

Delta Airlines (NYSE: DAL  )

($13,742)

($2,650)

$17,723

Fortune Brands (NYSE: FO  )

($1,802)

($50)

$4,477

Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  )

($1,008)

($2,229)

$5,695

American International Group (NYSE: AIG  )

($781)

($63,735)

$176,098

Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Of course, not every company that shares these traits is on the verge of failure, and I'm not suggesting that the above companies are literally about to fail. Boeing, for instance, reported a huge loss due largely to delays delivering the 787 Dreamliner. That's expected to be a temporary problem and not exactly a permanent loss to the company.

Similarly, Boston Scientific and Fortune Brands owe much of their losses to goodwill impairment charges. And while that's usually a sign of overly optimistic expansion plans gone astray, it's not exactly a corporate death sentence.

On the other hand, those three signs in combination often tell of darker days to come. Indeed, AMD has not been able to turn a full year's profit since 2005, Delta is no stranger to a bankruptcy court, and AIG has been kept alive only due to government help. And while Cablevision may not be actively barreling toward bankruptcy court, several other cable companies (like Adelphia, Charter, and Broadstripe) with high debt loads and weak earnings, have filed.

If a company is in debt, doesn't have enough assets to borrow against, and isn't earning profits, then it's only a matter of time before its debtholders get tired of financing its business. That's especially true now.

Buy smarter
In general, companies that hemorrhage cash, have weak balance sheets, and are drowning in debt make lousy investments. On the flip side, those that gush cash, make smart use of debt, and have solid balance sheets backing up their businesses can be tremendous companies to own.

That's especially true during times like these, when virtually every company has been knocked off its peak, and even some of the strongest ones are available at bargain-basement prices.

At Motley Fool Inside Value, we're actively scouring the market to find the solid companies whose shares have been left to rot alongside the truly damaged ones. When we find those diamonds in the rough, we share them with our members, who then have the opportunity to buy some of the world's greatest companies at bargain prices.

If you're ready to avoid the companies teetering on the edge of failure, and instead focus on those with the fundamental strength to thrive in the long run, join us at Inside Value. Simply click here to learn more or start your 30-day free trial.

This article was originally published March 10, 2009. It has been updated.

At the time of publication, Fool contributor and Inside Value team member Chuck Saletta owned shares of General Electric. The Motley Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, which is both a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection and an Inside Value pick. Fortune Brands is also a Stock Advisor pick. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2009, at 10:36 PM, TEBuddy wrote:

    Are these values, income and debt numbers even correct???

    So AMD is more likely to fail, yet it has never filed for bankruptcy, did not get any new loans from banks during the recession, and no Government aid. It was an attractive enough company to find investors. And it just received an entire quarters income from Intel, and no longer has to pay any patent license royalties. Paying off all its 2010 debt, and has the worlds leading graphics and supercomputing technology.

  • Report this Comment On December 02, 2009, at 11:23 PM, TMFBigFrog wrote:

    Hi TEBuddy,

    "Are these values, income and debt numbers even correct???"

    CapitalIQ, the data provider used in the screeen that built this table, is usually pretty reliable, but it has been known to occasionally have either incorrect or out of date information. A quick look at AMD's SEC filings indicate that the numbers from the CapitalIQ screen appear to be at least directionally correct.

    "So AMD is more likely to fail, yet it has never filed for bankruptcy, did not get any new loans from banks during the recession, and no Government aid."

    AMD had a strong enough overall balance sheet to enable it to survive this far, in spite of its less than stellar financial performance. Unfortunately, "had" is the key word in that sentence. Thanks to a new infusion of cash (the sources you mentioned), AMD will likely live to fight another day.

    "It was an attractive enough company to find investors. And it just received an entire quarters income from Intel, and no longer has to pay any patent license royalties."

    So hopefully that means AMD can compete better going forward. I'm not wishing death on AMD, even though I am an Intel shareholder. Competition is a good thing for consumers and, over the long run, for companies as well.

    "Paying off all its 2010 debt, and has the worlds leading graphics and supercomputing technology."

    My step-brother-in-law (seriously, my step-sister's husband) used to work for Cray computers. I remember when they had the world's leaning supercomputing technology... Having great technology and effectively profiting from that technology are two completely different things.

    In addition, I recall when Apple was primarily a computer company. There were times it had better technology and graphics than the IBM compatible systems out there at the time. Yet Apple barely limped along in the computing space until it came up with things like the iPod and iPhone. The handheld gadgets, rather than the high horsepower computing technology, are what transformed Apple into a powerhouse.

    I hope AMD is successful, but history shows that it takes more than just superior technology to win sustainable competitive advantage in the computing space.

    Regards,

    -Chuck

  • Report this Comment On December 06, 2009, at 5:50 PM, flabanker wrote:

    Thanks to a Cramer recommendation I am up 92% with AMD this year. Guess you all at the Fool missed out on that one.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1057179, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2012 12:12:48 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:01 PM
CVC $15.24 Up +0.51 +3.46%
Cablevision System… CAPS Rating: *
DAL $11.12 Up +0.13 +1.18%
Delta Air Lines, I… CAPS Rating: *
FO.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Fortune Brands CAPS Rating: *****
BSX $5.95 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Boston Scientific… CAPS Rating: ***
AIG $27.35 Up +0.31 +1.15%
American Internati… CAPS Rating: **
AMD $7.24 Down -0.01 -0.14%
Advanced Micro Dev… CAPS Rating: **
BA $75.90 Up +0.44 +0.58%
The Boeing Company CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement