Invest better with The Motley Fool. Get stock recommendations, portfolio guidance, and more from The Motley Fool's premium services.
Here's why.
*Average returns of all recommendations since inception. Cost basis and return based on previous market day close.
Motley Fool Returns
Market-beating stocks from our flagship service.
Calculated by average return of all stock recommendations since inception of the Stock Advisor service in February of 2002. Returns as of 2025-08-29 12:56:49.244563.
Discounted offers are only available to new members. Stock Advisor list price is $199 per year.
Calculated by Time-Weighted Return since 2002. Volatility profiles based on trailing-three-year calculations of the standard deviation of service investment returns.
Here's why Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE: SWK) may be cheaper than you think.
In the daily noise machine of CNBC, analyst estimates, and quarterly announcements, investors are inundated with talking heads obsessing over earnings-per-share figures.
Earnings, or net income, is an accounting construction that is the basis for the price-to-earnings ratio, the most popular way of measuring how cheap or expensive a stock is.
But free cash flow – the amount of cash a company earns on its operations minus what it spends on them – is another, oftentimes more accurate measure of earnings that can give you an advantage.
How Stanley Black & Decker stacks up
If Stanley Black & Decker tends to generate more free cash flow than net income, there's a good chance earnings-per-share figures understate its profitability and overstate its price tag. Conversely, if Stanley Black & Decker consistently generates less free cash flow than net income, it may be less profitable and more expensive than it appears.
This graph compares Stanley Black & Decker's historical net income to free cash flow. (I omitted various gains and charges such as tax deferrals, restructurings, and benefits related to stock options.)
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and author's calculations.
As you can see, Stanley Black & Decker has a tendency to produce more free cash flow than net income. This means that the standard price-to-earnings multiple investors use to judge companies may overstate its price tag.
There can be a variety of reasons to disregard such a discrepancy; for example, free cash flow can overstate earnings in businesses with volatile working capital needs, or understate earnings in high growth companies that are reinvesting capital in the business.
Alternatively, in cases where free cash flow more accurately measures earnings, such a discrepancy can indicate a company that is more -- or less -- expensive than investors realize.
Let's examine Stanley Black & Decker alongside some of its peers for additional context:
|
Company |
Price-to-Earnings Ratio |
Adjusted Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Stanley Black & Decker | 64.9 | 23.2 |
| Masco (NYSE: MAS) | N/A | 179.8 |
| Dover (NYSE: DOV) | 17.3 | 21.8 |
| Newell Rubbermaid (NYSE: NWL) | 24.7 | N/A |
On a P/E basis, Stanley Black & Decker looks a bit pricier than its peers. However, its free cash flow multiple is considerably less expensive than its earnings multiple, suggesting that Stanley Black & Decker's stock might be much cheaper than many investors realize.
To keep tabs on any of these stocks, make sure to add them to My Watchlist, our free, personalized stock tracking service.