Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Go Big, Microsoft

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) is expected to raise its dividend soon, maybe this week. Its current payout of $0.16 per share per quarter is expected to be bumped up to $0.19, according to Bloomberg estimates.

That's not enough. The company can, and should, raise its dividend dramatically higher.

Microsoft's returns over the past decade could be fodder for a book on the frustration of investing. Shares have flatlined for 10 years, yet its earnings grew at an annual rate of more than 21% during that period. That wasn't an anomaly based on cherry-picking the calendar. Over the past five years, shares have barely budged, yet earnings have grown 13% a year. Over the past three years, shares are flat, yet earnings have grown nearly 20% a year. Earnings have increased 28% over the past year. Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) have grown 6%. If one is to judge Microsoft by earnings power, growth, and consistency -- not stock performance -- it has been one of the great successes of American business over the past decade.

Yet you know its reputation: Microsoft is becoming irrelevant. It's running in place. It's falling behind. That's what you hear. The company faces real threats. No doubt about that. But its internal results seem disconnected from investors' perceptions.

Why? A lot of Microsoft pessimism is probably fueled by its dismal shareholder returns, which give off the aura of failure even against solid results.

Most of its poor performance over the past decade is rooted in the fact that it was obnoxiously overvalued 10 years ago. At 60 times earnings in 2000, the company was practically guaranteed to disappoint. And so it did.

But there's more to it than that. Microsoft currently trades at just over 8 times forward earnings. That's a full 50% discount from the broader market average and nowhere indicative of the performance that even the most bearish analysts forecast.

Notably, that disconnect isn't unique to Mr. Softy. Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) and Google -- two of the most admired companies in the world -- trade at lower price-to-earnings multiples than Consolidated Edison (NYSE: ED  ) , one of the most dreary companies in the world. The tech industry in general has some of the strongest companies in the market yet trades at one of the lowest valuations.

There are several theories on why this is. Low dividends among tech companies is one of them. With interest rates on fixed-income products at historic lows, the attraction to dividend yields on stocks has taken on a new level of fanaticism. Investors still pay up for growth, but they really pay up for yield.

That may be the key to turning around Microsoft's low valuation. The company already has high-quality earnings and well above-average growth. Its dividend policy, however, draws yawns.

Microsoft currently pays out about 20% of its free cash flow as dividends. At current share prices, that generates a 2.5% yield.

If the company bumped that payout ratio up to 40%, 60%, or 75%, the potential yields become hard to ignore:

Dividends as % of Free Cash Flow

Potential Dividend Yield

20% (current) 2.5%
40% 5%
60% 7.5%
75% 9.3%

If Microsoft paid out 60% of its free cash flow as dividends, the odds that its stock would remain priced for a 7.5% yield are near zero. Investors would pounce on that kind of yield, sending shares higher. I'll make a prediction (though I hate making those): At a 60% payout ratio, shares would rise enough to make the yield closer to 5% than 7.5%. That would mean a share price of around $33, up from $26 today.

What are the arguments against raising the dividend? There are a few.

First, higher dividends might mean lower share repurchases. And since share repurchases aren't subject to taxes, they might be a better deal for shareholders.

But the key word there is "might." If the market is willing to pay a higher premium for yield than earnings growth, dividends might create more value. Tellingly, dividends have historically created more value than anything else management choses to do with cash, including buybacks -- corporate managers just aren't good investors. Case in point: Microsoft spent tens of billions of dollars on buybacks a decade ago, when shares were blatantly overvalued.

Second, some say higher dividends mean less cash to spend on growing the company. Don't buy it. Microsoft already has more cash than it knows what to do with, and when it finds something to do, it often entails making a questionable and overpriced acquisition, like the recent deal to purchase Skype. 

Third, much of Microsoft's earnings are made overseas, so bringing cash back to the U.S. to pay dividends could mean repatriation taxes.

This is actually a decent argument, but not quite good enough. Microsoft still earns enough cash in the United States to pay a higher dividend without excessive repatriation. And even though I'm a firm supporter of ending the repatriation tax for good, a company should sit on its hands and wait for that day to come only up to a certain point. If the repatriation tax is never repealed, will multinational companies refuse to ever use overseas profits to reward shareholders? Never? Ever?

Microsoft should go big this week. It should dramatically raise its dividend.

Disagree? Tell us why below.                              

Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns shares of Microsoft and Edison. Follow him on Twitter, where he goes by @TMFHousel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Microsoft and Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Google and Microsoft and creating bull call spread positions in Microsoft and Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read/Post Comments (11) | Recommend This Article (14)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2011, at 9:10 PM, dastaub22 wrote:

    Increasing dividends would tell the market of management's confidence in the growth prospects of the company. As in, we can make up that cash flow in a short period due to our growth.

  • Report this Comment On September 14, 2011, at 9:49 PM, cmfhousel wrote:

    ^ Lots, and little, respectively.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2011, at 12:34 AM, Chilaw wrote:

    Morgan, great article. Please keep them coming.

    With $50B in cash, I have an alternative idea: Buy NFLX.

    It's price is down 1/3 to about $10-11B. With a 40% buyout premium, you pay about $15B, probably still less than the MSFT domestic cash available. CEO Reed H. is on the MSFT board and its key game console X-box was the first to incorporate NFLX. It gets MSFT into the streaming game and there are some synergies with Win8 and future Win/Nok mobile devices, and possibly even skype.

    NFLX needs deep pockets to buy content, fight off bigs like Amazon, GOOG, Apple, and Cables as well as found international expansion.

    Don't give your money away MSFT. That signals to investors you're out of ideas. The dividend lust will end as soon as the debt crises passes and growth/risk are back in vogue.

    Buy growth and leverage your position on the desktop, internet and TV to become a major player in streaming video. Oh, and keep Reed H. in house with a generous five year deal including a non-compete.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2011, at 12:43 AM, SPARTANBURG wrote:

    Arguably Microsoft is one company where the cost of studying its operations and its various indexes is higher than the benefits. Most things click for higher performance of the stock price but reality is totally different.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2011, at 1:29 AM, MaxTheTerrible wrote:

    "Microsoft currently trades at just over 8 times forward earnings. That's a full 50% discount from the broader market average and nowhere indicative of the performance that even the most bearish analysts forecast."

    That is exactly why share repurchasing instead if dividend hike might be the better option right now.

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2011, at 1:30 AM, MaxTheTerrible wrote:

    But as a current shareholder, I'd take 7.5% yield as well....

  • Report this Comment On September 15, 2011, at 1:18 PM, L69Z28 wrote:

    Great article. I own shares of MSFT and recently purchased more. I would love to have more dividends coming from them. Seems like the payout is small to me, but I am still learning.

  • Report this Comment On September 16, 2011, at 10:15 AM, Eerkes wrote:

    I might be in the camp that says it is never, ever right to pay repatriation taxes.

  • Report this Comment On September 16, 2011, at 10:58 AM, cmfhousel wrote:

    ^ $1 taxed at 30% is still more than $0 untaxed.

  • Report this Comment On October 05, 2011, at 1:51 PM, financeguy85 wrote:


    Now that we have the dividend boost in the rearview mirror, I would like to hear your thoughts. Was the bump to .20 enough in your opinion?

    (As an aside, you are virtually the only author I take seriously on this site anymore). Why is it that articles on new ideas and thoughts have been replaced by regurgitated "Why the Street should love ABC's earnings" and "Is ABC's dividend safe?"


  • Report this Comment On October 05, 2011, at 1:57 PM, cmfhousel wrote:

    <<Was the bump to .20 enough in your opinion?>>

    A good start, but no.

    <<(As an aside, you are virtually the only author I take seriously on this site anymore)>>

    Thank you! Plenty of other good writers here though.

    <<Why is it that articles on new ideas and thoughts have been replaced by regurgitated "Why the Street should love ABC's earnings" and "Is ABC's dividend safe?">>

    Plenty of original content still being published. The beauty is you can pick and choose what you want to read.


Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1553467, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/23/2016 8:29:48 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/21/2016 4:00 PM
AAPL $116.60 Down -0.46 -0.39%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
ED $73.17 Down -0.45 -0.61%
Consolidated Ediso… CAPS Rating: ****
GOOGL $824.06 Up +2.43 +0.30%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
MSFT $59.66 Up +2.41 +4.21%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****