# How to Calculate Static Budget Variances

### How and why a company should use a static budget, static budget variances, and flexible budgets.

Oct 23, 2015 at 10:27PM

Static budget variances are the differences between what a company or individual thought it would spend in its budget versus what it actually did. In a static budget, a company or individual creates the budget for the entire period -- a year, a quarter, or any other amount of time -- and doesn't change the budget as time moves forward.

To calculate a static budget variance, simply subtract the actual spend from the planned budget for each line item over the given time period. Divide by the original budget to calculate the percentage variance.

An example
If a company sets its budget for the year based on revenue of \$1 million, but actual revenue comes in at just \$500,000, then that company's budget can't simply stay static. It most likely doesn't have the finances to spend the same at \$1 million in revenue as it does at \$500,000.

With a static budget, the company will keep the original budget figures as is and simply record actual spending separately. The difference between the original budget and the actual spend is the budget variance.

In a flexible budget, the company would adjust the original budget as sales changed, instead of leaving the budget static. Commonly, flexible budgets are set using percentages, allowing these changes to happen without the need for constant tinkering.

In a static budget, marketing expense may be set at \$200,000. In a flexible budget, that expense could instead be set to 20% of sales. For a company with \$1 million in sales, these budgets start out the year equally. However, over time the static budget will create a variance with actual spending, while the flexible budget will naturally adjust if sales are higher or lower than forecast.

Is there an advantage to using static budget variances instead of a flexible budget?
In reality, most companies will use a combination of both a static budget and a flexible budget.

The flexible budget makes it easier for managers to make real-time spending decisions based on the actual performance of the business, while the static budget variance analysis is used as a management tool to better understand why the company performs the way it does.

A flexible budget is most useful for companies with sales and expenses that tend to vary or are hard to predict. Consider a company that gives an operations manager a static budget of \$250,000 for her department based on sales of \$10 million. Over the year, the manager spends just \$200,000, coming in 20% under her budget. That seems great, unless sales were below the forecast by more than 20%. If that happens, then her department would have ended up costing more as a percentage of sales than management intended at the start of the year, despite her cost-cutting efforts.

A flexible budget would ensure that this manager understands how her spending stands in relation to the actual sales of the company, and she can then optimize her spending to real time.

A static budget is useful as well, though, thanks to the variance analysis. Over the short term, a company can forecast results and spending very accurately. Over the long term, though, that task is much more difficult. Think about your own personal budget -- you can probably estimate your total spending this week with pretty close accuracy. But your spending for all of next year? That's a much more difficult estimation.

Understanding the differences between what you thought would happen and what actually occurred can be a powerful learning tool for a company or individual, and the static budget variance analysis provides the data to make that possible.

For a company with very stable numbers, either a static or flexible budget works simply because the numbers don't change much.

The \$15,978 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. In fact, one MarketWatch reporter argues that if more Americans knew about this, the government would have to shell out an extra \$10 billion annually. For example: one easy, 17-minute trick could pay you as much as \$15,978 more... each year! Once you learn how to take advantage of all these loopholes, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how you can take advantage of these strategies.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

# 4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

### Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.

The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video.

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than \$2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend.

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity.

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands."

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.