Wash Sales and Worthless Stock

When the stock market goes crazy -- and it always does -- you may find yourself holding stocks that you like from a fundamental standpoint but are now worth less than what you paid for them. They may be worth nothing at all. What to do?

All of a sudden, your brain crosses a red and black wire, and a flash appears. You say to yourself, "Self, I'll just sell these shares, take the loss on my tax return, and then immediately buy those shares back. I'll be able to keep the stock I really like and take a tax loss all at the same time. Sweet."

Our advice: Don't do it unless you know the rules. Uncle Sammy doesn't see the humor in your attempt to retain the economic position in your stock while you nab a tax deduction. To close this glaring loophole, the feds long ago named this transaction a "wash sale."

Wash sales explained
Under the wash-sale rules, if you sell stock for a loss and buy it back within 30 days before or after the loss-sale date, the loss cannot be immediately claimed for tax purposes.

This rule is designed to prevent you from selling stock to claim the loss and then buying it back within a short period of time to retain ownership. The rule applies to a 30-day period before or after the sale date to prevent "buying the stock back" before it's even sold.

This might sound outrageously unfair to you. After all, if your money was plunked into the stock and your dollars were lost, how can it be that you're not allowed to claim the loss?

Well, you do get to claim the loss -- just not now. Although the loss can't be claimed on a wash sale, the disallowed amount is added to the cost of the repurchased stock. So the loss can be claimed when the stock is finally disposed of, other than in a wash sale.

Example: Larry Laundry buys 500 shares of XYZ Corp. for $10,000 and sells them on June 5 for $3,000. On June 30, he buys 500 shares of XYZ for $3,200. Since the stock was repurchased within 30 days of loss-sale date, the wash-sale rules apply. Larry can't claim his $7,000 loss. Instead, he must adjust his basis in the repurchased shares. His basis in his new 500 shares is $10,200 -- the actual cost plus the $7,000 disallowed loss.

Larry would also be in violation of the wash-sale rules if he purchased his new shares on June 1 and then made the loss sale on June 5. Remember, the rule is 30 days before or after the date of the loss sale. But also remember that if Larry had waited for the required 30 days before he purchased another 500 shares, there would be no wash sale.

Buying fewer shares
What if you repurchase fewer shares than you originally sold for a loss? Is all of the loss disallowed? Nope. Only the portion of the loss attributable to the "washed" shares will be disallowed.

Thus, in the above example, if Larry had bought back only 300 of the 500 shares (60%), he would be able to claim 40% of the loss on the sale ($2,800). The remaining $4,200 of the loss disallowed under the wash-sale rules would be added to Larry's cost of the 300 shares, and Larry's basis in the new shares would be $6,120 -- the cost of the original 300 shares of $1,920 plus the disallowed loss of $4,200.

Clearly, if you're doing a bunch of trading in a specific stock (that's not very Foolish, by the way), the wash-sale rules can really complicate things.

Burning bridges
But -- and this is a very big "but" -- the wash-sale rules don't apply if you close out your entire position in the stock before the end of the year and then stay out of the stock for the required 30-day period before or after the date of the loss sale.

Let's look at Larry again. He certainly has a wash sale in the example above. But let's say that Larry tires of his position in XYZ and sells his 500 shares on Dec. 20 of the same year for $4,000. Larry's adjusted basis in the shares is $10,200 based on his wash-sale computations, and his overall loss would amount to $6,200.

But if you break down the two separate buy and sell transactions, you see that Larry generated a loss of $7,000 on the first transaction and a gain of $800 on the second transaction -- for a net loss of $6,200. This, amazingly, is the same amount of loss Larry computes when taking the wash-sale and basis-adjustment rules into account. So, since Larry closed out his entire position in the shares before the end of the year and stayed out of the stock for the required 30-day period, the wash-sale transactions actually become meaningless, and Larry can compute his gains and losses as he regularly would.

One final note: The wash-sale provisions work on shares that you sell for a loss, but there are no corresponding provisions for stock that you sell at a gain and then immediately repurchase. So although wash-sale losses can't be claimed, gains can't be avoided. That is, if you sell stock for a gain and buy it right back, you must still report the entire gain -- no special gain-deferral rule applies.

What to do with worthless stock
Occasionally, your losses will be really bad. Say you bought a stock at $20 per share, and it dropped to a few cents before going off the board altogether. How can you get rid of it now and claim it on your tax return as a loss?

If the company was liquidated, you should receive a 1099-DIV form at year's end showing a liquidating distribution. Treat this as if you sold the stock for the amount of the distribution. The date of "sale" is the date that the distribution took place. Using your original cost basis in the shares, you can now compute your loss.

If the company hasn't actually been liquidated, you'll need to make sure it's totally worthless before you claim a loss. If you have worthless stock that's not worth the hassle of selling through your broker, you can sell it to a friend (or cousin, aunt, or uncle) for pennies. (However, you can't sell the stock to a spouse, siblings, parents, grandparents, or lineal descendants.) Here's one way to do it:

  1. Get the actual stock certificates from your broker.
  2. Formally sell the shares to the purchaser, with a check for payment and a bill of sale.
  3. Sign over the stock certificate (on its back) to the purchaser. Have the signatures verified by your banker and/or a local stockbroker.
  4. Send the certificate to your stock-transfer agent. Explain that the shares have been sold, and ask to cancel the old shares and issue a new certificate to the new owner.

Some brokerages will offer you a quicker alternative, by buying all of your shares of the stock for a penny. They do it to help out their customers; in addition, over time, some of the shares may actually become worth more than the penny the brokers paid for them.

By selling the shares, you have a closed transaction with the stock and can declare a tax loss. Meanwhile, your friend, relative, or broker, for a pittance, has just bought a placemat or birdcage liner.

For more on the taxes that affect investors, read about:

Read/Post Comments (12) | Recommend This Article (31)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 30, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Wendysch wrote:

    Can you sell a stock in a taxable account at a loss and then turn around and buy the same stock in an Roth IRA?

    I know that I could not go and just repurchase the stock. However, I need to fund my Roth IRA and wanted to use a particular stock, since it is going to a nontaxable account.... I thought that it may not be a problem. The broker said that I could not just transfer the stock from one account to the other.

  • Report this Comment On November 08, 2008, at 3:29 AM, Bendyarm wrote:

    If you sell in a taxable account and buy in any "related" account including IRAs or other family members' accounts, it is at least a wash sale, and it might be even worse: you might *never* be able to deduct the loss! Some references:

    However, I have another question about wash sale rules. What if I have mutual fund MUTX in both a taxable account and an IRA. On Nov. 11 I sell the taxable account MUTX because I want to take the tax loss. Then on Dec 9 MUTX distributes the year-end cap gains which are automatically reinvested in the IRA. Does this reinvestment cause the taxable sale (or the equivalent part of it, at least) to become either a wash sale or a sale to a related party?

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2009, at 10:14 PM, jackybrs wrote:

    In the article above, it says "if you're doing a bunch of trading in a specific stock (that's not very Foolish, by the way)"

    Why is trading the same stock repeatedly not a good idea? I can't figure this out! Anyone has ideas?

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2009, at 10:25 PM, rupneu1 wrote:

    jackybrs, I think the author is talking about the tax consequences and wash rule of trading same stock repeatedly. As far as I understand, if you do day trade of one stock, you may have to wait forever to claim a tax loss on that stock. For example, let's say you buy C today and tomorrow it goes down 10% and you sell. Then, you buy again. You can't claim tax loss. However, the loss is added to the cost basis of your second purchase of C. If you keep doing buy and sell of the stock entire year, you may not be able to claim any loss even if you loose money, because of the wash rule.

  • Report this Comment On August 30, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Harker207 wrote:

    Also, one of the central investment theses of the Fool is long term buy and hold so you don't see your returns destroyed by commissions. Buying and selling the same stock repeatedly, even with the tax considerations, will generate greater amounts of commissions.

  • Report this Comment On January 30, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Airway101 wrote:

    This thread spoke only of individual stocks, I assume individual mutual funds have the same issue?

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2014, at 4:36 PM, giogio wrote:

    Is the following still valid? I know it is in the spirit of the law, but you never know with IRS. I had a wash sale in October 2013, I scaled in and out, and it would be simply disastrous for me. I never bought it back again in 2014. I really believe it is still valid.

    Anybody knows? I am urgently looking for this answer. Thank You

    the article above says:

    "Burning bridges

    But -- and this is a very big "but" -- the wash-sale rules don't apply if you close out your entire position in the stock before the end of the year and then stay out of the stock for the required 30-day period before or after the date of the loss sale."

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2014, at 10:03 AM, flopog11 wrote:

    Ok , I see one side of investing being discussed here but what if I sell a stock in an IRA account at a profit and buy the same stock when it goes below a limit price. ex:buy 100 shares XYZ @ $100/sh, sell 100 shares XYZ @$110/sh and buy 100 shares XYZ @ $100/sh...

  • Report this Comment On September 21, 2014, at 1:53 PM, tony25er wrote:


    I think IRA don't care how you gain or lost.

    Whenever you withdraw some money, you add to your income for income tax.

  • Report this Comment On January 21, 2015, at 7:42 PM, crocbass wrote:

    Motley Fool Staff , PLEASE READ AND CORRECT YOUR ARTICLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    and can trigger huge TAX CONSEQUENCES for your members:

    "the wash-sale rules don't apply if you close out your entire position in the stock before the end of the year and then stay out of the stock for the required 30-day period before or after the date of the loss sale".

    If you close your entire position and wait 30 days AFTER the sale before buying any share, the wash sale does not apply.


    If you sell your entire position , you also sell any possible REPLACEMENT shares bought BEFORE your loss sale.

  • Report this Comment On March 04, 2015, at 9:31 AM, watersnake wrote:

    I know that the Federal Government doesn't count a wash, does the state of California count a sell of a wash, I wasn't sure.


  • Report this Comment On June 14, 2015, at 10:37 PM, kashflojo wrote:

    Why do stocks go down in price if a lot of people sell the stock? If someone sold 10,000 shares of a stock at $100 per share then they would cash out at $1 million. So if others also sell, then the stock goes down. If the stock went down to $50 per share after a few weeks or months, and then that individual with the $1 million reinvested back into that same stock at the new low price then they would have 20,000 stocks. As long as the person could always buy low and sell hi with good timing then they could make a lot of money. Can someone be lucky enough to make money this way? If so, How does doing this contribute to the world?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 615266, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/23/2016 5:51:56 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,145.71 -16.64 -0.09%
S&P 500 2,141.16 -0.18 -0.01%
NASD 5,257.40 15.57 0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes