Don't let it get away!
Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.
Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.
Say it out loud. Doesn't it sound great?
These days, in the context of your portfolio, "cash" can be one of the most comforting words of all. It's soothing, cool, refreshing, relaxing, like a fresh ocean breeze on a hot summer day. It gives you complete peace of mind -- if you're in cash, you can tune out the market's daily lurches and stumbles, ignore the screaming on CNBC, relax, and revel in safety and comfort.
Or so you might think. Actually, you're taking a lot of risk.
Nope, that wasn't a typo. If you're investing for the long term, being 100% in cash is more likely to be risky than holding some stocks, because of the gains you're likely to miss. Think about it from a longer-term perspective: On average, since the 1920s, the market has returned roughly 9%-10% a year. Unless interest rates get really crazy, you're not going to see that kind of return from a money market fund or CD. And you certainly won't see it on any kind of sustained basis.
I talked to a woman recently who had put her retirement accounts in cash in the wake of the 1987 market drop, and left them in cash for a decade. She was acutely aware of how much money she'd lost in the interim -- an investment advisor had figured it out as part of (successfully) persuading her to move to a more diversified portfolio.
Let's just say it was a large number.
If you're sitting in cash right now, I'm assuming that you're still seriously worried about the near-term direction of the stock markets. That's fine -- obviously you don't have to plow all that cash right back into the stock market today in order to avoid that woman's fate. But you should have a plan in place for getting back in. And if you're really concerned about risk (and who isn't?), it's time to get serious about asset allocation.
Add risky investments, lower your risk
Asset allocation is a pretty simple concept. You're probably already familiar with it: In a nutshell, by spreading your investments among several different asset classes, you take advantage of the fact that different corners of the market show strength at different times, while minimizing your exposure to weakness that might hit one of those corners particularly hard.
At the simplest level, asset allocation is pretty easy: Own some bonds along with some stocks, and increase the ratio of bonds to stocks as you get older. That was the conventional wisdom decades ago. But the science has advanced a bit since then, and nowadays we focus mostly on stocks -- and we divide the universe of "stocks" into several different segments.
Consider, for instance, these segments, with examples of representative stocks in each:
- Large-cap powerhouses like Novartis (NYSE: NVS ) and 3M (NYSE: MMM ) .
- Value-priced small-caps like Manitowoc (NYSE: MTW ) and Precision Drilling Trust (NYSE: PDS ) .
- Big-growth possibilities like up-and-coming meat producer Sadia (NYSE: SDA ) and Spidey-lover Marvel Entertainment (NYSE: MVL ) .
- Foreign stars like Chinese energy firm CNOOC (NYSE: CEO ) .
The idea is that by combining mega-cap blue chips and promising small-caps, U.S. and foreign stocks, and value and growth prospects, we end up with a portfolio that's more than the sum of its parts, because the risks of the different asset classes offset one another to some extent.
Specifically, by adding the more volatile -- riskier -- types of stocks to our holdings in things like bonds and big boring blue chips, the overall volatility of the portfolio actually goes down -- as long as you stick with the strategy (namely, "don't sell everything and sit in cash") through the market's ups and downs.
How is this possible?
The recipe is the secret
In the new issue of the Fool's Rule Your Retirement newsletter, available online at 4 p.m. EST today, lead advisor Robert Brokamp lays it all out, starting with this observation: Risk is the foundation of higher returns. Working from there, and drawing on observations from asset manager (and Fool favorite) Larry Swedroe as well as financial-theory giants Eugene Fama and Kenneth French, Robert shows exactly how to use riskier types of stocks to lower the overall risk level of your portfolio.
This is a big deal -- whether you're sitting in cash right now or you've held stocks through the downturn, reworking your portfolio along these lines can help insulate you from further losses while positioning you for solid gains. That may sound impossible, but it's time-tested truth. Robert's article shows you how to make it happen -- and the newsletter's excellent asset-allocation templates give you a complete road map for your long-term holdings.
It's all here in the new issue of Rule Your Retirement. Not a subscriber? A free trial gives you full access to the new issue plus all of the Rule Your Retirement resources for 30 days, with absolutely no obligation. Click here to get started.