Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



How to Profit From Government Reform

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

With budget deficits mounting and continuing unabated into the future, government leaders agree that significant changes to the tax system are necessary if the U.S. wants to avoid becoming the next featured player in the global sovereign debt crisis. With a variety of proposals up for debate, you need to know what impact different tax reform measures would have on your personal finances and your investment portfolio.

Hard choices
The Fiscal Commission proposed many different measures in an effort to identify ways to increase government revenue and reduce spending. With no holds barred, many of the proposals were extremely controversial, ranging from lowering corporate taxes and ending popular tax deductions for mortgage interest and state and local taxes to moving up the retirement age for Social Security and cutting payments under Medicare.

It's unlikely that all of these will become law in their present form -- even the commission failed to reach the vote threshold necessary to send its plan to Congress. But considering the impact of each measure will help you anticipate the effect they would have on your finances even in watered-down form. So let's attack them one by one.

Lower corporate taxes
The Fiscal Commission recommended reducing the corporate tax rate from its current level of 35%. Clearly, that would have a big impact on companies that pay large amounts of tax. According to figures compiled by economist Martin Sullivan for testimony before Congress, drugstore company CVS Caremark (NYSE: CVS  ) pays an effective rate of tax of nearly 39%, with several major retailers and health-care insurance companies paying similarly high rates.

But many companies pay next to nothing in tax already. Range Resources (NYSE: RRC  ) paid less than 1% of its pre-tax income in taxes from 2005 to 2009, based on figures from Capital IQ. Western Digital (NYSE: WDC  ) and Broadcom (Nasdaq: BRCM  ) paid around 2% and 3%, respectively. So investors expecting to see big gains for their stocks from a corporate tax cut need to look more closely at their companies to see if they're actually even paying much tax to begin with.

Personal income tax reform
The Fiscal Commission proposals recommend big changes to the personal income tax system. It would lower rates but remove many current deductions, replacing mortgage interest and charitable contribution deductions with a smaller 12% tax credit. Dividend tax rates would return to the same rates as ordinary income.

From a personal standpoint, these changes would discourage home ownership, especially among higher-income taxpayers, as well as potentially reduce charitable giving. Depending on how much marginal rates were lowered -- one proposal suggested three tiers ranging from 15% to 35%, which wouldn't really be a reduction from current levels -- a rise in the effective rate on dividends could reverse the trend toward high-dividend stocks, or it could encourage more participation in tax-favored accounts in which dividend taxation would be irrelevant.

From an investing standpoint, a further reduction in demand for homes would hurt homebuilders, especially Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL  ) which bills itself as a luxury homebuilder aimed at the high-income taxpayers most affected by loss of the mortgage interest deduction. But apartment REITs Equity Residential (NYSE: EQR  ) and AvalonBay Communities (NYSE: AVB  ) have already been benefiting from the adverse environment for homeowners and could see even bigger benefits going forward if tax laws discourage homebuying.

Spending cuts
Along with tax-based revenue measures, the Fiscal Commission recommended changes to entitlement programs. For Social Security, gradually raising the early retirement age from 62 to 64 and the full retirement age from 67 to 69 would help the program survive longer, but at the cost of forcing younger Americans to work longer or plan for a longer period of retirement without financial assistance. For Medicare, higher out-of-pocket payments and proposals to limit payments for prescription drugs would hurt both seniors who already struggle to make ends meet as well as pharmaceutical companies that rely on sales to seniors for their profits.

In addition, the commission recommended long-feared cuts to defense spending and the discretionary spending areas of the federal budget. That would potentially hurt defense contractors and other companies that rely on government contracts, although those stocks have largely anticipated these cuts with depressed share prices.

Be prepared
It's going to take a lot of political will to implement wide-ranging changes like these, and skeptics might argue that it will never happen. But most people agree that we need to take action to balance the federal budget, and eventually, some combination of proposals like these will be necessary. If you're prepared in advance, you'll be able to make the most of the changes when they happen.

If you want to become a millionaire, there's a simple trick you need to know. John Rosevear shares his secret right here.

Tune in every Monday and Wednesday for Dan's columns on retirement, investing, and personal finance.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger likes looking for free money from the tax laws. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. The Fool owns shares of Western Digital. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Fool's disclosure policy doesn't need reform; it's perfect as it is.

Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 07, 2011, at 6:11 PM, xetn wrote:

    I frankly do not see any way of avoiding a default, when you have unfunded liabilities of an estimated $100 Trillion (SSN, Medicare, Fannie and Freddie, etc.) and god only knows what will happen when the states start defaulting on their obligations.

  • Report this Comment On February 07, 2011, at 11:50 PM, TraderHW wrote:

    If you want to read good research that explains what is going on in the economy and uncovers the truth check out the Capital Research Institute

    Manipulation of Government Data

    "...The reason for the manipulation of the GDP deflator is clear, because without changing it from 2.0% to 0.3% would mean that the GDP growth of 3.2% was actually closer to 1.5% during the 4th quarter. Let’s assume for a second that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the 4th quarter of 1.3% is correct (which as we know is also understated), then the GDP data understates inflation by 1% and thus GPD growth based on the CPI was at best 2.2%. Most people put a lot of trust in the government to tell them the truth about the state of the economy so that each individual can properly prepare for what is to come, but when data is manipulated to give people a false feeling that everything is alright while it clearly isn’t, is a crime. These results all should be audited by third party auditors in order to keep the bureaucrats at least to some degree honest."

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2011, at 9:59 AM, BMFPitt wrote:

    "...and could see even bigger benefits going forward if tax laws discourage homebuying."

    Do you mean to say, "If tax laws don't encourage reckless borrowing quite as much as they do now?"

    "...gradually raising the early retirement age from 62 to 64 and the full retirement age from 67 to 69 would help the program survive longer, but at the cost of forcing younger Americans to work longer or plan for a longer period of retirement without financial assistance."

    They will be working longer either way, because the alternative is that the program will simply be bankrupt. That may actually be preferrable in the long run, but it will be catastrophic to the generation that is left standing when the music stops.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1436972, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/24/2016 11:26:02 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,223.03 77.32 0.43%
S&P 500 2,151.33 10.17 0.47%
NASD 5,309.83 52.43 1.00%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/24/2016 4:04 PM
AVB $168.22 Up +0.28 +0.17%
AvalonBay Communit… CAPS Rating: *
BRCM.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Broadcom CAPS Rating: ****
CVS $88.00 Up +0.59 +0.67%
CVS Health CAPS Rating: ****
EQR $60.71 Down -0.32 -0.52%
Equity Residential CAPS Rating: ***
RRC $36.15 Down -1.05 -2.82%
Range Resources CAPS Rating: ***
TOL $28.76 Up +0.23 +0.81%
Toll Brothers CAPS Rating: ***
WDC $53.52 Up +0.45 +0.85%
Western Digital CAPS Rating: ***