Why IPOs Are a Lousy Bet

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

I never thought that one of my guilty pleasures would give me investing insight. But something I learned watching a home shopping channel showed me why buying into initial public offerings makes less sense than ever right now.

I'll share that insight later in this article. But first, I want to give some perspective on where the IPO market stands right now.

IPOs are back!
After a several-year hiatus in which we saw relatively few IPOs of any magnitude, initial public offerings are back in vogue. Facebook's IPO announcement last week was just the latest in a big series of companies going public, and you can expect far more IPOs to come if the stock market continues performing well.

But just because IPOs are getting more numerous doesn't mean they're a smart investment. It used to be that going public was a great accomplishment that marked a pinnacle of success for a company. But now, the IPO process is increasingly about prestige and exclusivity rather than actually putting a legitimate price on a company's value -- and IPO investors are the ones who'll suffer in the long run.

What I learned from home shopping
When I channel-surf, I often get stuck on a shopping channel, especially when they're selling coin sets. I like coins, but what draws me to the program is how they market them. The announcer always makes it clear that a coin is part of a relatively small set available, that quantities are limited, and that you should therefore buy now before they're all gone. That rarity is seen as a mark of potential price appreciation for the future.

What does that have to do with investing? Companies going public have taken a page from the home shopping channel and borrowed the same marketing strategy -- turning IPOs into limited-edition stock offerings. But there's a catch that can burn you in the long run.

Get your red-hot shares now!
In particular, companies are offering tiny amounts of their overall stock. Even though Facebook's $5 billion offering will dwarf other tech IPOs, it will still represent only 5% of the total shares outstanding. That's become commonplace among tech companies; Groupon (Nasdaq: GRPN  ) only offered 6.3% of its outstanding shares in its IPO -- the lowest stake for an IPO in the past decade -- while LinkedIn (NYSE: LNKD  ) came in at 8.3%. Those stakes are far less than the 20% to 25% that are more typical for an initial public offering.

Several analysts at the time pointed out that the scarcity value contributed to high valuations -- valuations that for Groupon and LinkedIn soared during the first hours of trading but then quickly led to big price declines for the companies involved. And interestingly, it's not a strategy that every tech company is following. Zynga (Nasdaq: ZNGA  ) , for instance, offered nearly 15% of its shares in its IPO -- a move that some blamed for the company's failure to jump on its IPO day.

But now you're starting to see the trend move beyond tech. Casino company Caesars Entertainment is planning a tiny offering of just 1.8 million shares worth about $16 million. That apparently may not include amounts that selling shareholders may add to the offering, but at least as the prospectus reads today, it represents only 1.5% of the total shares outstanding.

IPOs shouldn't be collectors' items
The problem comes when lock-up agreements expire, allowing investors to sell more shares onto the open market. For instance, Pandora (NYSE: P  ) came out of the gate with a roar at its June IPO, with shares trading as high as $26 before settling at an opening-day close of $17.42. But by the time locked-up shares became available six months later, the shares were down to around $10. Battery-tech company A123 Systems (Nasdaq: AONE  ) saw a similar plunge on the day its lock-up period ended.

IPO investors need to realize that companies understand supply and demand, and that low-float offerings are designed to make investors pay too much for shares. Don't let share scarcity scare you into overpaying, or else you'll end up with an investment that you can't just return to the shopping channel.

On the other hand, if you start out with excellent companies, collecting their shares for the long haul is a smart move. Discover the names of three great prospects by accepting my invitation to read The Motley Fool's latest special report, which focuses on stocks that will help you retire rich. The report is absolutely free, but it won't be around forever, so click here and read it today.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger bought IPO shares once, but it didn't turn out the way he'd hoped. You can follow him on Twitter here. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of LinkedIn. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Fool's disclosure policy will never go out of style.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2012, at 1:54 PM, R2Big wrote:

    I think that with IPOs, you have to ignore the hype and look at the data objectively. Particularly, look at their business and see if you think it has a future. That's why I thought Zynga would be overhyped, their reputation is in the toilet and people are getting tired of their games. With something like Facebook though, you have a lot of pieces in place to compete in multiple large business sectors so I think that's completely different. Divorce yourself from the hype and look at the facts and you'll do well in the long run even if you make a mistake once in a while.

  • Report this Comment On February 06, 2012, at 5:00 PM, idanpl wrote:

    Let's say I own a business, and let's say I want to sell it to you.

    What does it mean about the business? Does it mean that it's a good time for you to buy, or is it a good time for me to sell?

    I'm not saying that every IPO is bad, but that's another way to look at IPOs.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1773775, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/26/2016 2:09:48 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 4 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,169.27 -53.76 -0.30%
S&P 500 2,143.16 -8.17 -0.38%
NASD 5,283.40 -26.43 -0.50%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/31/1969 7:00 PM
AONEQ.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
A123 Systems CAPS Rating: **
GRPN $5.32 Up +0.15 +2.90%
Groupon CAPS Rating: *
LNKD $189.30 Down -0.55 -0.29%
LinkedIn CAPS Rating: ***
P $12.18 Down -0.62 -4.84%
Pandora Media CAPS Rating: **
ZNGA $2.91 Down -0.03 -0.85%
Zynga CAPS Rating: *