Recs

2

Is Long-Term Care Insurance Just a Ripoff?

This article was updated on June 10, 2015.

For years, long-term care insurance seemed like the ideal solution to one of the biggest concerns of an aging population. But premiums on existing policies have risen dramatically in recent years, and as a result, long-term care insurance is rapidly turning into a nightmare for millions of policyholders.

In 2013, the California Public Employees' Retirement System said it would have to boost the premiums it charges its policyholders for long-term care insurance by 85% by this year. The move caused an outcry among the 110,000 CalPERS policyholders who have long-term care coverage with lifetime benefits, most of whom have had the insurance for 10 to 20 years.

Since then, premiums have risen at a slightly more modest rate, with the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance finding that premiums increased 8.6% as of early 2015 compared to the previous year. Nevertheless, with past increases already in the books, further rises only exacerbate the problem of affordability for many policyholders.

Why is long-term care insurance getting so expensive?
It's easy to understand why having long-term care insurance is important. With people living longer and the cost of healthcare skyrocketing, having the safety net of an insurance policy designed to cover the costs of nursing homes and home-health care has grown increasingly necessary.

But the same trends of rising healthcare costs and an aging population that have made long-term care insurance so attractive to consumers has presented big challenges to the insurance industry. Having underestimated the true costs of the health care that long-term care policies offer, insurance companies have struggled to price their policies correctly. Moreover, low investment returns have hampered insurance companies' efforts to reap enough income from early premium payments to cover costs when insured policyholders start claiming benefits.

In response, insurance companies have faced a dilemma: Should they try to get state insurance regulators to approve huge premium increases, or should they simply eat their losses and move on? A number of companies have chosen the latter approach, with Genworth Financial (NYSE: GNW  ) having decided in 2013 to temporarily suspend sales of certain long-term care products in California pending approval of a replacement product that would offer reduced benefits at higher costs. Even though the company continues to offer long-term care insurance, it has remained a financial struggle. Prudential Financial (NYSE: PRU  ) and MetLife (NYSE: MET  ) have taken the more dramatic steps of discontinuing long-term care sales in recent years, largely because of the financial challenges involved in offering the policies.

In addition to CalPERS, many private insurance companies have sought higher premiums to keep selling long-term care policies. A subsidiary of Manulife Financial (NYSE: MFC  ) serving California got approval from regulators to raise long-term care premiums by 40% late in 2012, while CNA Financial (NYSE: CNA  ) made a request to the California Insurance Department for a 45% increase.

Bait and switch?
For existing policyholders, the main problem is one of sunk costs. Insurance agents typically advise people to obtain long-term care insurance as early as possible to reduce costs, as premiums are much lower for younger policyholders who are less likely to need benefits in the immediate future. What that means, though, is that those who've held onto their policies a long time have already paid tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars in policy premiums without having gotten a dime in benefits to show for it.

Now, to avoid losing their coverage, these longtime policyholders have to find hundreds of dollars to cover extra premium payments each month. For many retirees living on a fixed income and already facing substantial price increases for other basic living expenses, that will prove an impossible task, and they will have to accept lower benefits or even give up their policies entirely -- thereby wasting all the money they've spent on premiums for years.

What should you do?
Policyholders who have to deal with premium increases face some tough decisions. Retaining full coverage will cost a lot more, so some insurance providers are offering less extensive benefits as a replacement. As painful as accepting reduced benefits might be, it could prove to be a better option than simply allowing coverage to lapse entirely.

Unfortunately, the economics of long-term care make it likely that price pressures on policies will continue. For those considering buying long-term care insurance now, it's essential to read long insurance-policy documents carefully so that you'll know in advance about provisions that could send your premiums skyrocketing in the future.

How one Seattle couple secured a $60K Social Security bonus -- and you can too
A Seattle couple recently discovered some little-known Social Security secrets that can boost many retirees' income by as much as $60,000. They were shocked by how easy it was to actually take advantage of these loopholes. And although it may seem too good to be true, it's 100% real. In fact, one MarketWatch reporter argues that if more Americans used them, the government would have to shell out an extra $10 billion... every year! So once you learn how to take advantage of these loopholes, you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after, even if you're woefully unprepared. Simply click here to receive your free copy of our new report that details how you can take advantage of these strategies.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3404396, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2015 4:45:50 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Dan Caplinger
TMFGalagan

Dan Caplinger has been a contract writer for the Motley Fool since 2006. As the Fool's Director of Investment Planning, Dan oversees much of the personal-finance and investment-planning content published daily on Fool.com. With a background as an estate-planning attorney and independent financial consultant, Dan's articles are based on more than 20 years of experience from all angles of the financial world.

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,058.35 -469.68 -2.84%
S&P 500 1,913.85 -58.33 -2.96%
NASD 4,636.11 -140.40 -2.94%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

9/1/2015 4:02 PM
CNA $34.75 Down -1.23 -3.42%
CNA Financial Corp CAPS Rating: ****
GNW $4.85 Down -0.33 -6.37%
Genworth Financial… CAPS Rating: ****
MET $47.99 Down -2.11 -4.21%
MetLife, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
MFC $15.37 Down -0.86 -5.30%
Manulife Financial… CAPS Rating: ****
PRU $77.12 Down -3.58 -4.44%
Prudential Financi… CAPS Rating: ****