Social Security: Why Women Should Wait Longer Than Men to Receive Benefits

Based on the average life expectancy of American women versus men, the former would be wise to wait longer before receiving Social Security benefits.

May 18, 2014 at 11:04AM


There are two things that give me hope for the human race. The first is ice cream. And the second is the fact that women live longer than men. For the moment, we'll set the first to the side and concentrate on the latter, looking specifically at what it means for the purposes of Social Security.

As you may know, the earlier you elect to receive Social Security benefits, the smaller your monthly check will be for the remainder of retirement.

Under the current guidelines, if you begin collecting benefits at 62, which is the earliest you can do so, then your monthly check will be 25% less than had you waited until 66, at which point you're entitled to the entirety of your "primary insurance amount."

Alternatively, if you wait until 70 then your check will be 32% larger than the latter thanks to so-called "delayed retirement credits." These increase your benefits by 8% for every year (or two-thirds of 1% for every month) after 66 that you defer them, up to a maximum of four years or until you turn 70.


Of course, this doesn't mean it's always better to wait for as long as possible before applying. For instance, if you can't afford to wait and/or don't anticipate living past age 77, then you're better off going ahead and receiving benefits as soon as possible.

The most obvious exception is if you're planning on working between the ages of 62 and 66. In that case, your monthly check is temporarily docked by $1 for every $2 that you earn above $15,480 a year. The net result is that your benefits could be effectively squandered with little to show for it.

An added reason to defer benefits is if you expect to live beyond age 77. And it's for this reason, in turn, that women would generally be smart to delay benefits longer than men.

According to the World Health Organization, the average life expectancy of an American man is 77.4 years old. Meanwhile, a woman who's born and raised in the United States is expected to live until 82.2 years of age. That puts the typical male right at the 77-year-old threshold and the average female well beyond it.

The difference between the sexes on this score is so dramatic, in fact, that the average woman would actually be better off (again, assuming it's financially feasible for her to do so) waiting until 70 before applying for benefits, at which point she's entitled to the additional 32% boost as a result of delayed retirement credits.

Now, just to be clear, I'm admittedly playing the averages here. Making the determination about when to start collecting Social Security is a highly individualized analysis that's based on much more than just whether you're a man or woman. That being said, it's something that prudent retirees should nevertheless take into consideration.

How to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information