Recs

1

Social Security: Why Women Should Wait Longer Than Men to Receive Benefits

There are two things that give me hope for the human race. The first is ice cream. And the second is the fact that women live longer than men. For the moment, we'll set the first to the side and concentrate on the latter, looking specifically at what it means for the purposes of Social Security.

As you may know, the earlier you elect to receive Social Security benefits, the smaller your monthly check will be for the remainder of retirement.

Under the current guidelines, if you begin collecting benefits at 62, which is the earliest you can do so, then your monthly check will be 25% less than had you waited until 66, at which point you're entitled to the entirety of your "primary insurance amount."

Alternatively, if you wait until 70 then your check will be 32% larger than the latter thanks to so-called "delayed retirement credits." These increase your benefits by 8% for every year (or two-thirds of 1% for every month) after 66 that you defer them, up to a maximum of four years or until you turn 70.

Of course, this doesn't mean it's always better to wait for as long as possible before applying. For instance, if you can't afford to wait and/or don't anticipate living past age 77, then you're better off going ahead and receiving benefits as soon as possible.

The most obvious exception is if you're planning on working between the ages of 62 and 66. In that case, your monthly check is temporarily docked by $1 for every $2 that you earn above $15,480 a year. The net result is that your benefits could be effectively squandered with little to show for it.

An added reason to defer benefits is if you expect to live beyond age 77. And it's for this reason, in turn, that women would generally be smart to delay benefits longer than men.

According to the World Health Organization, the average life expectancy of an American man is 77.4 years old. Meanwhile, a woman who's born and raised in the United States is expected to live until 82.2 years of age. That puts the typical male right at the 77-year-old threshold and the average female well beyond it.

The difference between the sexes on this score is so dramatic, in fact, that the average woman would actually be better off (again, assuming it's financially feasible for her to do so) waiting until 70 before applying for benefits, at which point she's entitled to the additional 32% boost as a result of delayed retirement credits.

Now, just to be clear, I'm admittedly playing the averages here. Making the determination about when to start collecting Social Security is a highly individualized analysis that's based on much more than just whether you're a man or woman. That being said, it's something that prudent retirees should nevertheless take into consideration.

How to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 18, 2014, at 7:29 PM, carmeno wrote:

    Reason number one for not waiting: You hate working for idiots and the older you are the higher the chances that your boss is an idiot who knows less than you but thinks old ladies should be in a nursing home. Forget it. I started at 62 and I couldn't be happier than I am now; downsized and tending to the garden (except that now instead of flowers it's vegetables and fruits). Money is good to have but happiness is worth more. (Plus, the paid for house, the money in the bank that you actually don't need, and nothing left to buy.) Worked for me.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2954537, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/22/2014 2:27:46 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

John Maxfield
JohnMaxfield37

John has been writing for The Motley Fool since 2011. As a senior banking analyst, he covers the financial industry and the nation's largest banks in particular. He has a bachelor's degree in economics from Lewis and Clark College and a juris doctorate from Southern Methodist University. He's a licensed attorney in the state of Oregon, and resides in Portland with his wife and twin sons. View John Maxfield's profile on LinkedIn

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 17,195.04 -84.70 -0.49%
S&P 500 1,994.21 -16.19 -0.81%
NASD 4,517.76 -62.03 -1.35%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes


Advertisement