Social Security: How Those 45 and Younger Could See Benefits Cut

Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Most Americans know all too well about the financial crisis that faces the Social Security system. The most recent Social Security Trustees Report noted that it anticipates the program's trust fund to run out of money by 2034 and, without further action, automatic benefit cuts of more than 20% will likely be necessary to make up for the shortfall between what Social Security collects in payroll taxes and what it has to pay recipients.

In order to resolve Social Security's financial problems, proposed solutions include raising taxes, or changing the way that the program pays future benefits. Because of the political dangers of tackling the situation, the government has thus far taken no action toward a long-term solution. However, if you turn back the calendar more than 30 years, history offers a hint of what the possible solution might turn out to be. If lawmakers follow the same course, then those age 45 and below could have to make sacrifices in their future Social Security benefits in order to ensure that older Americans receive full payments.

Source: Office of the Inspector General, Social Security Administration.

The history of fixing Social Security
Back in 1983, lawmakers faced huge threats to Social Security. Years of inflation had led to increased cost-of-living adjustments, and payroll tax revenue had failed to keep up. In order to ensure the sustainability of Social Security, the divided government had to find a compromise that would satisfy lawmakers in both parties.

In the end, the Social Security Amendments of 1983 accelerated payroll-tax increases and implemented provisions to include up to half of Social Security benefits as taxable income for what, at the time, were upper-middle-class taxpayers. But the amendments balanced those short-term proposals with longer-term changes that were aimed squarely at younger workers.

Specifically, the amendments to Social Security raised the full retirement age from 65 to 67. But instead of doing so immediately, changes were phased in gradually over a span of 22 years. For those who were 45 in 1983, the full retirement age was raised to 65 plus two months, with those born in each successive year adding two months until the full retirement age reached 66 for those born between 1943 and 1954. Those who were 28 or younger in 1983 will face even bigger reductions, with those born in 1955 having a full retirement age of 66 and two months. The retirement age will max out at 67 for those born in 1960 and after.

Headed for 70?
Higher retirement ages affect retirees in two ways. The 1983 amendments didn't prevent people from claiming early retirement at age 62, but the higher full-retirement age leads to a bigger reduction in benefits for those who take them at their earliest opportunity. If a similar increase happens now, then those who would get delayed retirement credits for waiting beyond full retirement age will receive smaller bumps up in their monthly payments, because they'll have fewer months' worth of credit between a higher full-retirement age, and their maximum benefit at age 70.

The government has considered proposals to raise the retirement age even further, with some considering increases to as high as 70 years old. In order to minimize friction, lawmakers are likely to seek once again to put the full onus of retirement-age increases on younger Americans. If future legislation follows the framework of the 1983 amendments, then those born in 1970 or later could start to see retirement ages rise by a couple of months per year until they hit 68 or 69 and, after a possible period of stability, further increases as high as 70 could affect those in their 20s and younger.

Without further adjustments, raising the retirement age would reduce early retirement benefits by five percentage points per year. It would eliminate the eight percentage point per year delayed retirement credit for as many years as the full retirement age goes up.

Watch out for Social Security changes ahead
Proposals to increase the retirement age don't appear to be imminent. But, as talk of a Social Security crisis gets louder, you can expect more pressure on the government to make changes to sustain Social Security's long-term future. Raising the retirement age is one tried-and-true way to extend Social Security's life; but younger workers should be especially aware of possible future legislation that would go against their best interests.

How to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.

Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 10, 2014, at 12:20 PM, dusty10x wrote:

    Average workers will have numerous reasons to take ( or be forced to take ) social security early...Raising the age of retirement only serves to assure less retirement money when it will be worth even less.........The best method is to raise the payroll tax....Then if things get better decades later and we have a surplus coming in we could give the ( then current ) retirees an added raise...Cutting benefits further for later retirees is unacceptable and does not help the current problems of the government paying back the almost 3 trillion dollars in savings they have spent.....

  • Report this Comment On August 10, 2014, at 8:28 PM, JesterFinancial wrote:

    Those that state Social Security is going broke need to understand that the current Health Care regulations dictate that it will never happen.

    Please, before making assumptions on this particular entitlement, read how Medicare works alongside Social Security.

    Social Security is no certain way is going to go broke...ever, but it still doesn't mean that you are going to receive your benefit.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3065406, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2015 7:57:45 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Dan Caplinger

Dan Caplinger has been a contract writer for the Motley Fool since 2006. As the Fool's Director of Investment Planning, Dan oversees much of the personal-finance and investment-planning content published daily on With a background as an estate-planning attorney and independent financial consultant, Dan's articles are based on more than 20 years of experience from all angles of the financial world.

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,351.38 293.03 1.82%
S&P 500 1,948.86 35.01 1.83%
NASD 4,749.98 113.87 2.46%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes