What Might Social Security Look Like in 20 Years?

Source: via Flickr.

Ask a majority of Americans what they think about Social Security -- the program intended to provide income to qualifying individuals so as to help prevent financial hardship -- and they'll tell you it's broken. According to a CNN/ORC International poll conducted in 2011, more than 70% of respondents believed Social Security was in "crisis" or had "major problems." 

For one, different generations have different ideas of what Social Security has done for them or could do for them in the future. A retiree currently receiving Social Security will likely tell you how their monthly benefits have helped them make ends meet, with 85% of those aged 65 and up noting in that same CNN/ORC poll that Social Security has been "good" for them personally. Ask a millennial, however, and you're apt to get little more than a shrug, as most millennials have experienced no direct benefit of Social Security. 

Another reason Americans lack faith in Social Security is the fact that we have passed the proverbial tipping point: More money is being paid out than is coming in. The reason this is happening is a large demographic shift. Baby boomers are retiring en masse, and there aren't enough young, working adults to replace the benefits baby boomers are receiving. Not to mention that life expectancy in the U.S. is improving, meaning people are living longer and drawing down on the Social Security Trust that much more.

Source: Stephen Jones via Flickr.

What might Social Security look like in 20 years?
Based on the current rate of reserve depletion and estimates from both the Congressional Budget Office and the Social Security Administration, the reserve fund will be gone somewhere between 2033 and 2037. In other words, Social Security will look vastly different in 20 years.

But what might that future look like? Let's have discuss a few scenarios.

The do-nothing approach

Regulators are left with two basic choices as they stare down the depletion of the Social Security Trust Fund: do something or do nothing.

If regulators choose to do nothing, the system will not -- I repeat, will not -- go bankrupt, despite pervasive myths that it will. However, beneficiaries' payouts will almost assuredly decline.

According to forecasts from the Social Security Administration, if beneficiary payouts were reduced to 75%, or three-quarters of their current payout level, the revenue coming in via workers' paychecks would funnel enough into the system to keep Social Security benefits flowing through 2087.Granted, no beneficiary wants to see cuts to the system when they retire, but all in all, something is better than nothing.

Source: Social Security Administration.

Practical ways Social Security may be changed
It's more likely, however, that the regulations surrounding Social Security will be altered to extend full benefits to beneficiaries for as long as possible. Here are some of the methods that lawmakers might employ to improve the long-term outlook for Social Security.

1. Boost payroll taxes
One simple way to fix the Social Security inflow shortfall is to merely boost the current payroll tax of 6.2%. With the exception of the payroll tax holiday for employees in 2011-2012, the current payroll tax has remained unchanged at 6.2% since 1990. Prior to 1990, though, this tax increased with some regularity. While most consumers will fight tooth-and-nail to avoid higher taxes, when it comes to their financial well-being upon retirement, they're all for paying more into the system.

According to a study (link opens PDF) released by the National Academy of Social Insurance in early 2013, close to 80% of respondents said they'd be on board with tax increases if it meant a more secure future for themselves, their families, and the program as a whole. Of course, these same respondents also expected that minimum benefits would increase and that cost-of-living adjustments would rise from their current levels, too.

NASI's study noted that if the payroll tax were raised from 6.2% to 7.6%, it would allow Social Security benefits to continue to be paid in full for the next 75 years. While it's tough to predict what lawmakers will do, raising the workers' portion of the payroll tax would seem to make a lot of sense.

2. Eliminate the cap on taxable earnings
Another option, which could come in addition to the previous option or by itself, is the elimination of earnings caps with regard to Social Security taxation.

As it stands now, workers are taxed at the rate of 6.2% on earnings up to $117,000. Any income above that level isn't taxed, meaning the Warren Buffetts of the world pay a tiny portion into the Social Security program as a percentage of their annual earnings, though they make far more than the average person.

The easy way to remedy this is to drop the Social Security earnings cap altogether and allow all earnings to be taxed. According to NASI's findings -- which assumed an orderly elimination of this cap over a 10-year period that would only affect 5% of the population -- the extra income generated by taxing higher-income individuals throughout the entire year would close the Social Security funding gap by 71%.

Source: Nicola Jones via Flickr.

3. Raise the retirement age
Though higher taxes might be a strong possibility, it's possible that payroll taxes could remain unchanged if other cuts are made. One potential solution is boosting the retirement age.

Currently, the Social Security Administration considers 66 to be full retirement age, though for persons born in 1960 or later, the full retirement age is scheduled to increase to 67. NASI calculated that raising the retirement age to 68 would reduce benefits paid by 7% and cut the current funding gap by 15%. Raise that to age 70, and the savings would triple to 21%, while the gap would be narrowed by 25%. Of course, these cuts are only feasible if persons currently aged 25 to 45 have adequate retirement savings, otherwise the financial hardship of waiting those few extra years could more than offset the benefits received from a reduction to the funding gap.

4. Means-testing for beneficiaries
Another popular option that NASI addressed is means-testing beneficiaries to determine whether they really need Social Security income.

Let's again recall that Social Security was implemented as a fail-safe to prevent financial hardship. If an individual or couple is bringing in six figures annually during retirement from their investment portfolio or through royalties, does they really need an additional $20,000 to $30,000 per year in Social Security benefits?

Logically, the answer here would be no, as their retirement income would appear to be more than sufficient to keep them out of financial hardship. However, these individuals paid into the system just like everyone else, so the idea of denying them the right to get their share of benefits upon hitting retirement age didn't exactly sit well with respondents polled by NASI.

A plethora of options
The truth of the matter is that there are even more possible outcomes than I've listed above, but the solution to the Social Security Trust funding shortfall likely lies in some combination of the above paths.

Source: Tax Credits, Flickr.

In my opinion, raising the retirement age will likely be the toughest sell, given the poor savings rate in the U.S. and the fact that few Americans are adequately prepared for retirement. As a recent study from Bankrate showed, 36% of all Americans -- and more than two-thirds of those aged 18 to 29 years -- haven't saved a dime toward their retirement. Instead of benefiting the nation as a whole by shrinking the fund gap, pushing benefits further out could potentially cause even more problems.

Working individuals staring down this funding gap will clearly see some change during their lifetimes, but they shouldn't be reliant on lawmakers to fix the problem. Instead, workers should focus on funding their retirement accounts as soon as possible so they can utilize the power of time and compounding gains to their advantage. And if workers have an adequate base of savings to live off of until they reach age 70, then they have the potential maximize their benefits received from Social Security.

Here's a simple strategy you can use to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.

Read/Post Comments (10) | Recommend This Article (21)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 11:45 AM, ydnars01 wrote:

    Raise the earnings cap. Only allow those who make $125,000.00 per year when retired ( all sources ) to collect the portion of Social Security Tax that they contribute and not the employers portion. Use 3 cents per gallon of gas tax and use it for Social Security Fund. These three should help.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 11:54 AM, havingmysay wrote:

    The problem with social security is the number of people who collect who never contributed. If it were to be set up like a regular pension whereby the working spouses' pension were to be reduced in order to provide a death benefit for the surviving spouse this would make sense. No benefit should be paid out prior to that for anyone who never worked or put into the system. Something like 36% of the people collecting never contributed.

    My husband and I both worked over 40 years each and contributed to SS. I have many friends and family members who were stay at home Moms who never worked a day and are collecting their checks. I feel like I have been robbed.

    And to the issue of immigrants, particularly those brought in through chain migration who are older. These people only have to be here, I believe for 5 years, before they can start to collect SS. This is yet another burden on the system and our younger citizens who being asked to retire later and donate more to this giant Ponzi scheme.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 12:27 PM, speedster55 wrote:

    Wish I was rich like our 13% approval congress Im disabled vet Now I wish I wouldn't of fought for this country !!

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 1:08 PM, skimpen60 wrote:


  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 3:39 PM, wwarner52 wrote:

    For decades this Government of ours has allowed businesses to vacate the U S and it's tax system, only to produce their products in a country that subsides business. This vacuum has created a shortfall of taxes here at home by loss of jobs. When both employee and employer contributed to the tax system. The companies then ship their products back to the U S with no penalties, Free trade, WTO, &%$#s the American worker and our country. For every item that comes to our shores, it should have a tax to cover our Social security system including our health care. If they don't like it sell it somewhere else, and the American people should really try harder not to purchase these items. There is soooo much that our elected officials ignore that hurts the citizens of this country and the country itself. But hey they and their supporters got there's. We as a people need to do a better job of whom we elect to office. Love for my country but wish it would be a little less capitalistic. I have no respect for most of the Gov. Since they seem to work for someone other then country. Some taxation is good when it benefits the country as a whole and some not so good due to mismanage of funds. I believe we can do better in everyway

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 4:08 PM, lhedrick wrote:

    1. Stop now the access for illegal immigrants to get SS.

    2. Stop now all the excess expenditures the congress just tried to pass like a $1,000 allowance per month for each member to rent a car.

    3. Stop now, the 15% plus increase in salary they give themselves each year plus all their free benefits, such as health care. They should pay for their own like the taxpayer.

    4. Leave the SS and disability alone.

    5. Make everyone making $200,000 per year and above pay SS. No loopholes for the rich.

    6. COLA needs to increase not decrease. Every year, Medicare B and D cost more and everything else goes up also, especially drugs. The seniors now and the disabled are doing either without their drugs or without food just to survive. The government people and the rich should look at how hard the poor and disabled are struggling and clean up their own act before they do any more harm to those who are old and sick. One of the 10 commandments is Thou shall not kill!!. The rules against the seniors and disabled are quickly doing just that. We will all stand before God on Judgement day!

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 5:26 PM, Vendetta wrote:

    I think that Congress should not get paid for the first 2 yrs. then start getting paid. if you get re-elected then you get the back pay for the first 2 years. Make Congress pay for everything. No more free Health care. no more free haircuts. every check you bounce you have to pay a fee at the bank. no more golden Parachute retirements. you must fund your own retirement. and you Must pay SS.and pay income tax.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 7:07 PM, ssammy wrote:

    Make it a law that any cuts be duplicated to the pay and benefits of congress and the president. Return the money the government has looted from the fund over the years. Raise the cap to 1 million per year and tax stock dividends. Make it mandatory for members of congress and the president to work at least 30 years before being eligible for retirement. Why do we pay retirement to a man who only works 4-8 years? Demand corporate giants like Walmart pay a decent wage so the government does't have to subsidize worker retirement and health care. Most folks on social security just scrape by.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2015, at 7:35 PM, linrame wrote:

    Stop giving benefits to those who have never paid into Social Security.

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2015, at 1:12 AM, d1evad wrote:

    we need to relook at the fraud from social security disability, way to many are collecting disability and can still work, answering call for cell phone companies, hotels,refering to desk jobs, just as where federal money goes ,city services so shall people on disability, my neighbor is on disability for his back, guess what, he cuts grass, snowblows driveway,washes his vehicles, he has not worked in 23 years,amazing,there are plenty of government funded jobs to put spmeone on payroll. sad shame what this country has come to , easier to go on disability with the help on crummy lawyers and on the take judges. what a shame.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3075001, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/3/2015 11:55:46 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Sean Williams

A Fool since 2010, and a graduate from UC San Diego with a B.A. in Economics, Sean specializes in the healthcare sector and in investment planning topics. You'll usually find him writing about Obamacare, marijuana, developing drugs, diagnostics, and medical devices, Social Security, taxes, or any number of other macroeconomic issues.

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,374.76 23.38 0.14%
S&P 500 1,951.13 2.27 0.12%
NASD 4,733.50 -16.48 -0.35%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes