Recs

53

Retire at 62: 5 Simple Reasons Why You Shouldn't

Source: Social Security Administration.

For decades, retiring at age 65 has been the time-honored tradition in America. Even as the official full retirement age for Social Security has climbed to age 66, the goal of many Americans is to chop a few years off their careers and aim for an early retirement at 62. In particular, the fact that Social Security is available to early retirees at that age is a powerful inducement to pick 62 as a retirement goal.

But before you decide that age 62 is the best time for you to retire, you need to understand a few things. In particular, the following five aspects of early retirement could lead you to make a different decision about when you leave the workforce for good.

1. Your monthly Social Security check will be smaller
For most people, Social Security benefits first become available at age 62. But the amount you'll receive every month is reduced. Specifically, for those retiring now, payments will be 25% smaller than they would be if you waited until full retirement age of 66 -- and 43% smaller than they would be if you waited until the maximum-benefit age of 70.


Source: Social Security Administration.

The trade-off, of course, is that the reduction mostly accounts for the fact that someone who takes benefits at age 62 gets 48 extra monthly payments compared to waiting until age 66. Nevertheless, what might seem like ample income now could leave you regretting not holding out for larger monthly payments later.

2. Healthcare is a huge burden to take on
An even bigger challenge early retirees have to deal with is healthcare coverage. With Medicare not kicking in until age 65, those who retire at age 62 have to deal with three full years of covering their own health insurance costs.

Federal law can help early retirees bridge part of the gap in coverage, with COBRA continuation health coverage usually available for up to 18 months after you quit your job. But even under COBRA, you're responsible for making insurance payments, and given that health insurance premiums are near their highest levels for those in their early 60s, that can be a bigger financial burden than most people realize.

3. Social Security will be smaller for your family
Electing to receive early Social Security benefits doesn't just affect your monthly payment. It can also reduce the amount that your surviving spouse receives after you pass away. Survivors' benefits are limited to the amount you would have received if you were still alive, so if you started collecting before full retirement age, your surviving spouse would have to accept reduced payments as well.


Source: Social Security Administration.

4. You may be giving up the best-earning years of your career
For some fortunate workers who decide for themselves when to retire, retiring at 62 can be a substantial financial sacrifice. If you've climbed the corporate ladder throughout your career, then you could well be at your peak earnings in your early 60s, and early retirement can cost you both directly through the loss of that income and indirectly through the impact on Social Security or pension benefits.

Obviously, many early retirees aren't in this position, especially as employers cut staff and encourage early-retirement packages precisely to cut these costs. But if you are, make sure you're financially ready before you pull the trigger and give up a golden opportunity.

5. 62 might be too late for you to retire
If you've gotten through all four of the reasons above and have addressed all those concerns, then another question you should consider is whether you might actually be able to retire before age 62. Even without Social Security, a solid retirement savings plan can help you retire in your 50s or even 40s if you have the earnings potential and investing track record to back it up. In that case, waiting until 62 could leave you missing out on extra years of a happy retirement.

Retiring at 62 isn't always a bad move. But before you do it, make sure you understand all the consequences. Knowing what's at stake could lead you to what turns out to be a better decision for you and your family.

How to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.


Read/Post Comments (7) | Recommend This Article (53)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 9:36 AM, glocker62p wrote:

    One simply reason why you should retire at 62: you planned ahead, you followed that plan and retirement at 62 will comfortable.

    The age at which you retire is irrelevant. If you planned and made the right moves financially, you'll be ready when you reach your target age whatever that age may be.

    To make a blanket statement on what's the best age to retire is not only misleading and arrogant, but also completely ignorant of an individual's personal financial circumstances.

    Blanket statements are generalizations and a generalizations are fallacies.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 11:10 AM, Jim8 wrote:

    I have to agree that health care is now a limiting factor, because everything the "Affordable" Care Act offers us is too expensive and covers so little that it isn't worth purchasing for someone in their 60's.

    I had a great retiree plan from my employer which covered me 100% no matter what happened, but now I'm one of the newly uninsured.

    My retirement savings is now at risk, but the odds are with me, and I have almost $12,000 I didn't flush for insurance that only would have made me pay MORE for services that I'd pay in cash.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Jim8 wrote:

    I saw set to disagree with this article because work = stress, and stress is a killer.

    Then I read the part about health care being a factor. It wasn't last year for a lot of us, but it now is, thanks to a really bad idea, the "Affordable" Care Act.

    If you are poor it's probably great, but if you worked your life looking forward to retiring, it now makes that an impossibility for a lot of people.

    My employer did as a lot probably did, dropped our retiree medical because we can now buy it on the exchanges. Only problem there is that everything available on the exchanges isn't worth buying if you are paying for it and do the numbers.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 11:42 AM, segarolow4 wrote:

    Retire as soon as you can....

    Down size big time.

    Get the hell out of Dodge...

    And have a great time..

    Don't work until you die on the job.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 12:48 PM, Doyouseeme wrote:

    Retire now, whether you are getting less or not. For many there is no other course. Most of what was said is just a lot of hooey. SS is getting over on people who have worked most of their lives and yet being cheated out of their money because the corrupt government has increased the retirement age. It isn't fair.

    No matter what age you retire at, all should get the maximum they deserve.

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 3:05 PM, RatchetOriginal wrote:

    I retired at 53 and my wife at 55. We have had no regrets!!!

  • Report this Comment On August 24, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Diamondick wrote:

    Retired @ 56! Lovin' every minute of it.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 3074122, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/19/2014 6:19:21 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Dan Caplinger
TMFGalagan

Dan Caplinger has been a contract writer for the Motley Fool since 2006. As the Fool's Director of Investment Planning, Dan oversees much of the personal-finance and investment-planning content published daily on Fool.com. With a background as an estate-planning attorney and independent financial consultant, Dan's articles are based on more than 20 years of experience from all angles of the financial world.

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 17,279.74 13.75 0.08%
S&P 500 2,010.40 -0.96 -0.05%
NASD 4,579.79 -13.64 -0.30%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes


Advertisement