Images
Image source: Flickr user www.vpsi.org. 

Optimistic investors held out hope that the second week of trading would bring a rebound following the worst five-day start to a new year ever, but instead they got red arrows pretty much across the board once again.

Through the first half of January, the iconic Dow Jones Industrial Average has declined by 8.2%, or more than 1,400 points, the technology- and biotech-heavy Nasdaq Composite has sunk 10.4%, or better than 500 points, and the broad-based S&P 500 (SNPINDEX:^GSPC) is off 8%. In fact, the S&P 500 briefly touched an intraday low on Friday that was below the rapid correction we witnessed in August 2015.

To put it mildly, you could say some investors and short-term traders are worried. CNN has a tool known as the Fear & Greed Index that examines seven fear and greed indicators -- such as market volatility, put and call option breadth, safe-haven investment demand, and junk-bond demand -- and as of Friday, the index, which is ranked on a scale of 0 to 100, closed at a 10, or "extreme fear." For added context, the Thursday close was a 17, Friday, Jan. 8, 2016's close was an 18, and a month ago the rating was a modest 44. People are scared, and emotions are presumably pushing the market lower at a very fast pace.

The only chart that really matters during a market crash
But for investors who focus on finding quality companies to hold over the long term, the past two weeks really shouldn't be too worrisome. Why? I believe the following chart of the S&P 500 (I prefer to use the S&P 500 since it's the most encompassing index of the three major U.S. indexes) tells you everything you need to know about the stock market:

^GSPC Chart

On the surface this 50-year chart probably doesn't look very exciting, and that's because it's really difficult to cram 50 years' worth of stock moves into a chart that'll fit on your computer or mobile screen. What you may not see in this chart is that between 1965 and the end of 2015 the S&P 500 underwent 27 corrections of 10% or more (numbers were rounded to the nearest integer). However, data provided by Yardeni Research this past week makes these corrections much easier to see.

Keep in mind that the data tends to overlap by a year on each subsequent chart, but this gives you a good look at the trading activity of the S&P 500 over the past 28 years, as well as the length of time each correction lasted from peak to trough.

Sp
Image source: Yardeni Research

Sp
Image source: Yardeni Research

Sp
Image source: Yardeni Research

A few things worth noting based on the three charts from Yardeni Research above. First, corrections are actually really common. Not only are they common -- they tend to occur about every two years -- but they're often short-lived; thus, the 8% decline in a matter of two weeks really isn't as abnormal as you might be led to believe. The only thing "different" from year's past is the timing of when we began correcting at a rapid pace.

Secondly, we spend more time in rising markets than we do during periods of correction. This is more of an extension of the prior point that corrections, while not uncommon, tend to happen quickly and be over with. Only with rare exception (the 2000-2002 correction, which lasted 915 days, and the 2007-2009 correction, which went on for 510 days) do corrections last a prolonged period of time.

But here's the most important thing to note: The S&P 500 reclaimed the lost value in every single instance involving a correction of 10% or more. That's 27 corrections of at least 10% (again, rounded up) since 1987, and every single one of those corrections wiped out by a bullish rally at some point. Sometimes it takes just weeks to wipe out the effects of a correction, or as you can see with the dot-com bubble of 2000, it took a good seven years for long-term investors to be vindicated once more.

The point here is simple: The 50-year chart above of the S&P 500 shows you the only thing you need to know during a market correction: that over the long run stock valuations tend to move higher. Since 1950 there have been 34 corrections of 10% or more, and every single correction has been eventually wiped out by a bullish rally. This bodes extremely well for investors who purchase high-quality companies and hold them for long periods of time.

Images
Image source: Flickr user www.vpsi.org. 

Buy-and-hold is still your best bet
Additional data also suggests that buying-and-holding is your best bet. The folks at J.P. Morgan Asset Management, utilizing data from Lipper, examined the returns of the S&P 500 between Dec. 31, 1993, and Dec. 31, 2013, and made an intriguing discovery.

Despite undergoing two very steep corrections of 49% and 57% on the S&P 500, investors who bought and held those roughly 5,000 trading days earned more than a 480% return. That's a figure that would handily outpace inflation over the long run, leading to real wealth creation. But here's where things get interesting: If you missed out on just the 10 best days over this approximately 5,000-day trading period, your returns fell from 483% to just 191%. Missing the 30 best days would cause your return to sink to less than 20%, or lower than 1% annualized.  

The data suggests pretty clearly that staying invested over the long term is your best way to prosper, and that trying to time the market can cause you to miss out on some bad weeks, but also some very strong weeks, too. Missing even a handful of the market's strongest days could be the difference between retiring early, or perhaps many years later.

Sean Williams has no material interest in any companies mentioned in this article. You can follow him on CAPS under the screen name TMFUltraLong, track every pick he makes under the screen nameTrackUltraLong, and check him out on Twitter, where he goes by the handle @TMFUltraLong.

The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy