Recs

6

The Downside of the Roth IRA

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

It's hard to argue with the appeal of the Roth IRA: Sock away post-tax dollars now, then withdraw your years of accumulated growth tax-free in retirement! Unfortunately, most investors don't realize that the rules now enshrining that promise of tax-free goodness could change at any time.

Before you laugh off that notion, remember that Social Security benefits weren't always taxable. Amendments to the Social Security Act back in 1983 introduced that wrinkle. Today, depending on your means, part or much of your Social Security benefit may be taxable income to you.

Tax rules change over time. Rates have gone up and down throughout history, on both incomes and our investments. Various credits and deductions come and go. In the Roth's case, means-testing could leave wealthier accountholders paying taxes on at least some of their withdrawals.

Pluses and minuses
There's no question that investing in an IRA makes a lot of sense for most of us. It's a great wealth-building tool with considerable tax advantages. But the benefit of the traditional IRA -- deduct your contributions now, pay taxes on withdrawals in retirement -- is immediate and certain, while the Roth's is back-loaded and less certain.

For young people with decades ahead to grow their nest eggs, the Roth is especially compelling. Since they may end up with sizable retirement accounts, the equally large tax savings they might stand to gain could make the Roth worth the gamble.

The decision is never clear-cut, though. If you're in a steep tax bracket now, and you expect to be in a low one come retirement, a traditional IRA might make more sense. Conversely, if you foresee overall income tax rates rising significantly for everyone, then the possibility of tax-free withdrawals from a Roth could be more attractive.

Pre-deathbed conversions
The toughest decision may face those considering converting a traditional IRA into a Roth. You can do so, but you'll probably have to pay taxes on the amount you convert, since you likely got a deduction when you plunked it into the traditional IRA. Dealing with big lump sums rather than gradual contributions over time can make this decision even tougher. The current annual contribution limit for traditional and Roth IRAs is $5,000 for most of us, and $6,000 for those 50 or older. But you might have $100,000 or more stashed in a traditional IRA that's been growing for years. Converting all of that into a Roth could stick you with a tax bill for tens of thousands of dollars.

That big bill can be worth it if your $100,000 grows well over time, leaving you with bushels of tax-free withdrawals. But if the rules change, you'll have paid taxes on the conversion only to face taxes again upon withdrawal.

I'm not suggesting that you rule out the Roth. It's far too powerful, at least potentially, to deserve that. Just factor in the possibility of rule changes when making your IRA decisions.

You might decide to fund both kinds of IRAs; opt to convert only part of your traditional IRA assets; or even re-convert a Roth IRA into a traditional IRA at some point in the future. (The IRS is cool with do-overs, as long as you play by the rules.)

Uncle Sam giveth, and Uncle Sam taketh away. But no matter what the government decides to do, you can keep more of your dollars if you take the time to learn the tax rules, and plan your money moves carefully.

True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian does not own shares of any companies mentioned in this article. Try any of our investing newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.


Read/Post Comments (3) | Recommend This Article (6)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 06, 2010, at 9:44 PM, rd80 wrote:

    "If you're in a steep tax bracket now, and you expect to be in a low one come retirement, a traditional IRA might make more sense."

    You assume the traditional IRA is deductible. For someone in a steep tax bracket who's covered by an employer's plan, it probably isn't.

  • Report this Comment On October 08, 2010, at 12:12 PM, IlliniBanker wrote:

    Excellent post Selena!

    Just wanted to sound off a couple of comments:

    1.) Social Security is perceived as more of a government-funded benefit than a Roth IRA. You're right that the feds can take it away, but I think there's a lot more political will against breaking this kind of promise on investors- especially when they would have paid only 20% on dividends and LTCG.

    2.) Don't forget that you can pull the principle out of a Roth at any time tax-free. Additionally, tuition for graduate school and $10K towards your first home are also qualified tax-free distributions if you've held the account for five years. So there's other reasons to have a Roth than just retirement in 40 years.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2010, at 9:06 AM, r1976smith wrote:

    Selena,

    Very insightful post. I have been weighing the pros and cons about converting from a Traditional IRA to a Roth. I do like that the principle of the Roth can be pulled out at any time. However, in many cases that may be both a pro and a con.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1324054, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/30/2014 6:38:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Selena Maranjian
TMFSelena

Selena Maranjian has been writing for the Fool since 1996 and covers basic investing and personal finance topics. She also prepares the Fool's syndicated newspaper column and has written or co-written a number of Fool books. For more financial and non-financial fare (as well as silly things), follow her on Twitter...

Today's Market

updated 9 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 17,098.45 18.88 0.11%
S&P 500 2,003.37 6.63 0.33%
NASD 4,580.27 22.58 0.50%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes


Advertisement