Should WSJ.com Be Set Free?

Recs

3

One of the first things to go down once News Corp. (NYSE: NWS) completes its purchase of Dow Jones (NYSE: DJ) may be the wall that has fortified its WSJ.com online hub as a premium subscription service over the past 11 years.

Yes, The Wall Street Journal takes its website seriously. Most of the site is walled off to its 983,000 paying subscribers, unless they pony up for the Web-based service, too.

So why would Rupert Murdoch even entertain the notion of going all AOL on us? Increased traffic would clearly grow the online-advertising and paid-search opportunities, but it would come at the expense of surrendering the more predictable flow of paid subscriptions.

Yet it's something that the Journal itself is pondering publicly today. This morning's paper weighs some of the comments that Murdoch made yesterday at a Goldman Sachs conference. Suggesting that tearing down the subscriber wall "looks like the way we are going," he's doing more than just floating a trial balloon.

He has already worked out the math.

"I think you'd get not 1 million paying customers, but, around the world, you'd get 10 to 15 million regular daily hits on it, and that would be the most affluent, the most influential people in the world," he said, in arguing that giving up $50 million in annual subscription revenue could be made up elsewhere.

Bringing down the walls is about more than just getting a lot of hits, though. News Corp. is making a big bet with next month's launch of the Fox Business Network. If Murdoch wants to take on General Electric's (NYSE: GE) CNBC as the mainstream business source of choice and rely heavily on the trusted WSJ brand as a catapult, then opening up its quality reporting to the masses makes perfect sense.

Online subscriptions have always been tricky. New York Times (NYSE: NYT) knows it. The newspaper is throwing the towel on its Times Select digital-subscription experiment -- something that I figured would eventually happen, even back when it launched two years ago.

Then again, stock research is something that investors typically don't have a problem paying for when capital gains are at stake. Whether it's Morningstar (Nasdaq: MORN) research reports or the newsletter services that you will find on sites such as TheStreet.com (Nasdaq: TSCM) and right here in Fooldom, subscriptions are a part of most financial-website models.

However, sites like Fool.com, Morningstar, and The Street also offer most of their non-newsletter editorial content for free. If Murdoch has his way, WSJ.com will follow suit sooner rather than later.

Follow along with the Global Gains team as they travel to key business centers in China to uncover the very best investing opportunities! Sign up here to receive their FREE dispatches from the road.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 537059, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/6/2009 7:46:42 PM

Keep Reading:

“Should WSJ.com Be Set Free?”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Jul 6 at 4:01 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,324.87 +44.13 +0.53%
S&P 500 898.72 +2.30 +0.26%
NASD 1,787.40 -9.12 -0.51%
Sponsored by: