Panel Kills Merck's Hope of OTC Status

Recs

1

Looks like the third time won't be the charm for Merck's (NYSE: MRK) MEVACOR. Yesterday an FDA advisory panel voted 10-2 that the drug not be given over-the-counter (OTC) status.

Merck has been trying for seven years to get the FDA to move the cholesterol-lowering drug to a more convenient place for customers. Its failed bids in 2000 and in 2005 were essentially because the FDA was worried that customers wouldn't make the right choice about whether they should be taking the drug and caused Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) to back out of its marketing partnership with Merck.

Merck ran studies to try and show that consumers really are smart enough to know if they should be taking the drug, but the FDA and its advisory panel were still worried about a subset of mock patients who said they would buy the drug even though it wasn't appropriate for them.

The OTC status could have been a boon to Merck and its recently announced marketing partner GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK). MEVACOR has long since been overtaken by newer statins, including Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE) Lipitor, AstraZeneca's (NYSE: AZN) Crestor, and Merck's own ZOCOR, but the OTC status could have broadened the market to include patients with milder cholesterol issues who aren't currently on medication. Even though MEVACOR is off-patent, the duo would still get three years of marketing exclusivity before generic competitors could market it OTC.

While the advisory panel vote isn't binding, when combined with the negative FDA summary that FDA reviewers presented to the panel, it seems unlikely that the agency will make the status change. The decision certainly won't give Merck a heart attack; it still has its cholesterol drugs from its partnership with Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP), as well as a pipeline that contains a few cholesterol drugs.

More Foolishness available OTC:

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 554169, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 6:27:13 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is Everybody Losing It in Finance's Nervous Breakdown?

Related Tickers

12/1/2009 4:00 PM
JNJ $63.51 Up +0.67 +1.07%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
PFE $18.85 Up +0.68 +3.74%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
GSK $42.41 Up +0.94 +2.27%
GlaxoSmithKline pl… CAPS Rating: *****
MRK $36.88 Up +0.67 +1.85%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
AZN $45.74 Up +0.91 +2.03%
AstraZeneca plc (A… CAPS Rating: ****
SGP $28.15 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Schering-Plough Co… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Savings account: A savings account is an account held at a bank or credit union in which the interest rate paid to the account holder is typically higher than that of a checking account, but lower than that of less liquid assets, such as bonds or certificates of deposit (CD's). A savings account does not have the advantage of check writing one would enjoy with a checking account, and has some withdrawal limits,…

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!