Panel Kills Merck's Hope of OTC Status

Recs

1

Looks like the third time won't be the charm for Merck's (NYSE: MRK) MEVACOR. Yesterday an FDA advisory panel voted 10-2 that the drug not be given over-the-counter (OTC) status.

Merck has been trying for seven years to get the FDA to move the cholesterol-lowering drug to a more convenient place for customers. Its failed bids in 2000 and in 2005 were essentially because the FDA was worried that customers wouldn't make the right choice about whether they should be taking the drug and caused Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ) to back out of its marketing partnership with Merck.

Merck ran studies to try and show that consumers really are smart enough to know if they should be taking the drug, but the FDA and its advisory panel were still worried about a subset of mock patients who said they would buy the drug even though it wasn't appropriate for them.

The OTC status could have been a boon to Merck and its recently announced marketing partner GlaxoSmithKline (NYSE: GSK). MEVACOR has long since been overtaken by newer statins, including Pfizer's (NYSE: PFE) Lipitor, AstraZeneca's (NYSE: AZN) Crestor, and Merck's own ZOCOR, but the OTC status could have broadened the market to include patients with milder cholesterol issues who aren't currently on medication. Even though MEVACOR is off-patent, the duo would still get three years of marketing exclusivity before generic competitors could market it OTC.

While the advisory panel vote isn't binding, when combined with the negative FDA summary that FDA reviewers presented to the panel, it seems unlikely that the agency will make the status change. The decision certainly won't give Merck a heart attack; it still has its cholesterol drugs from its partnership with Schering-Plough (NYSE: SGP), as well as a pipeline that contains a few cholesterol drugs.

More Foolishness available OTC:

“The Death of the Euro!”…Greece may seem worlds away, but be warned. What happens there next could reshape global finance and rattle your portfolio. On Mar. 22, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson heads to Greece to get the story. Follow in real time and hear how best to profit from this historic development (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 117%!). Enter email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 554169, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 3/20/2010 10:13:11 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 12 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 10,741.98 -37.19 -0.35%
S&P 500 1,159.90 -5.92 -0.51%
NASD 2,374.41 -16.87 -0.71%

Related Tickers

3/19/2010 4:00 PM
JNJ $65.11 Up +0.05 +0.08%
Johnson & Johnson CAPS Rating: *****
PFE $16.91 Down -0.32 -1.86%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
GSK $38.57 Down -0.65 -1.66%
GlaxoSmithKline pl… CAPS Rating: ****
MRK $38.06 Down -0.39 -1.01%
Merck & Co., Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
AZN $44.11 Down -0.63 -1.41%
AstraZeneca plc (A… CAPS Rating: ****
SGP $28.15 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Schering-Plough Co… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Sarbanes-Oxley Act: The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (often called SOX for short) is a law that was passed in the wake of the Enron and Worldcom scandals. SOX requires public companies to have greater internal controls.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!