Waiting for the Next Bear Stearns

Recs

3

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

It's been awhile since I've heard anything about the Bear Stearns collapse. Nobody seems to care anymore. A year ago, most investors would have scoffed at the possibility of its collapse. They would have assumed that the fallout from the failure of a large financial firm might as well mark the end of the world. Alas, it happened. Bear Stearns fell. Yet the market hasn't crashed, hedge funds haven't fallen into an abyss, and, thank heavens, the sun still rises over Wall Street.

Good thing, too. Because a Bear Stearns-style implosion might easily happen again.

Get ready
According to a survey from Greenwich Associates, nearly 60% of 146 institutional investors polled expect another major financial firm to collapse in the next six months, and another 15% think it'll happen within the next year.

Now, it'd be easy to brush off that statistic if institutional investors were merely annoyances in the finance world. In other words, that kind of pessimism wouldn't be a big deal if it didn't have an effect on the future of the financial firms they're worried about.

But it does.

When neighbors attack
Sure, Bear Stearns probably dug its own grave with a collection of collateralized debt obligations and credit default swaps that nobody, even it, could decipher. But what cast the final blow back in March was a swift exodus among counterparties -- other banks and institutional investors. In other words, there was a run on the bank that squeezed the life out of Bear's cash supply before it could do anything about it.

Consequently, some of the same investors who are overwhelmingly predicting another collapse are the same ones who can actually cause another collapse. That's a lethal combination, especially when the same investors can make a quick buck doing so.

And, oh, how they can make a quick buck. Bloomberg recently reported at least one investor purchased a block of put options just days before Bear failed -- a purchase so large and so incredibly bearish (pun intended) that some observers think the buyer may have purposely tried to drive Bear into an all-out collapse. In the end, whoever made the freakishly pessimistic bet reaped a profit of more than a quarter-billion dollars.

Now there's another variable in the equation: Some of the same investors who predict another collapse and have the power to cause another collapse have an opportunity to make a fortune off another collapse. We'll leave calculating the odds up to the statisticians, but that trifecta of factors doesn't bode well for those predicting that the worst is behind us.

Great -- so who's next?
Trying to measure pessimism in advance is a tricky business. One thing investors learned from Bear Stearns is that as soon as someone sounds the alarm, there's no time to escape. Bear went from allegedly well capitalized to virtually well nationalized in a matter of hours. One thing we can look at, however, is the extent to which short-sellers have ganged up on investment banks. Here are some short-selling numbers on some of the largest banks:

Company

One-Year Decline

Short Interest*

Percentage of Float Sold Short

CAPS Rating (Out of 5)

Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS)

(7.3%)

15.05 million

3.90%

***

Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER)

(66.4%)

63.02 million

6.40%

*

Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH)

(72.5%)

85.32 million

12.70%

*

Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS)

(29.2%)

47.13 million

4.30%

**

UBS (NYSE: UBS)

(63.1%)

15.88 million

<1%

*

JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM)

(14.3%)

56.71 million

1.70%

**

Piper Jaffray (NYSE: PJC)

(31.5%)

3.02 million

16.80%

*

*As of 7/10/08. Source: Yahoo! Finance.

Lehman Brothers and Piper Jaffray appear to be destined for doom, judging by short-sellers' actions. Of course, this is nothing new: For months, Lehman has been on the receiving end of short-selling attacks, some of which were fueled by unsubstantiated buzz. There's no telling how far investors will go when there's so much money to be made exaggerating a company's troubles.

Maybe the worst is behind us. I hope it is. One thing is for sure, though: Until the deluge of rumors and pessimism begins to wane, it's nearly impossible to determine the future of investment banks. Sure, all of this hoopla will work its way out in the long run, but remember what John Maynard Keynes taught us: In the long run, we're all dead.

For more on the Bear Stearns collapse, financial panics, and short-seller attacks, check out:

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn’t own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. JPMorgan Chase is a Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 13, 2008, at 6:00 PM, NevAathome wrote:

    You know, it might be useful to get your facts right. Bear Sterns, in fact, did not fall. It was bought by JP Morgan, as we all know, and JPM assume the risk of Bear's balance sheet.

    If a firm like Bear really filed for bankruptcy, the consequences would be unthinkable as worlds financial firms today are inexorably interconnected through derivative contracts. Hence why the Fed orchestrated the rescue, much like LTCM in 1998.

    After the Fed forced Bear Sterns into the arms of JPM, it made the lending program available to investment banks so they now have the Fed as a last resort lender. This was done to restore market confidence and it did.

    As long as the investment banks have the Fed as a last resort lender, they cannot be talked down to the point of the tail wagging the dog by traders spreading falls rumors (btw, put options affected Bear Sterns more than short sellers, check your facts).

    This point alone is evidence sufficient for me to disagree with you. Am I saying the worst is behind us? No, I believe the financials have many more quaters of losses to come but we will not see another fall like Bear.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 706499, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 12:00:13 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 11:24 AM
GS $170.70 Down -1.30 -0.76%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
UBS $15.98 Down -0.23 -1.42%
UBS AG (USA) CAPS Rating: **
LEH $0.13 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Lehman Brothers Ho… CAPS Rating: *
MS $32.14 Down -0.48 -1.47%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: **
MER $11.64 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Merrill Lynch & Co… CAPS Rating: *
JPM $42.26 Down -1.02 -2.36%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
PJC $45.75 Up +0.02 +0.04%
Piper Jaffray Comp… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Long-term asset: A long-term asset is one that is consumed or used over a number of accounting cycles, from more than one year to 40 years.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!