Recs

17

Are Your Dividends Safe?

More than 340 companies reduced or eliminated their dividends in 2008. Whether you rely on your dividends for current income, cash to reinvest, or signals of a company's true strength, those reductions should be troubling.

Yet even amid all the chaos and panic of 2008, not all the dividend news was bad. Many companies managed to maintain their payments throughout 2008, and some even raised them.

Last year might have been one of the most extreme investing years of recent memory, but even in more usual markets, being able to tell the difference between a strong, well-supported dividend and one on the verge of elimination might be the most important skill you carry in your investing toolkit.

3 ways to tell
Three metrics can help you eyeball a dividend's sustainability.

First, a company's payout ratio (the percentage of earnings paid out to investors through dividends, calculated as the yearly dividend per share divided by the earnings per share), has historically provided an excellent indicator of the dividend's sustainability. So long as a company didn't pay out too much of its earnings, the dividends were likely safe.

While that's still an important metric, the credit crunch that led to this particular meltdown serves as a stark reminder that there's more to financing dividends than simply earning a profit.

Second, a company's quick ratio (a measure of short-term liquidity) helps you see how well it can cover the bills it has coming due based only on its cash on hand and easily liquidated current assets.

In an economy like this one, when even profitable companies can't easily refinance their debts, a strong quick ratio will help protect those payments. General Growth Properties (NYSE: GGP  ) , for example, was forced to suspend its dividend because of an inability to pay, extend, or roll over its debt, despite being cash flow positive.

Finally, a company's debt-to-equity ratio, which divides total liabilities by the shareholder's equity, demonstrates just how much debt it has taken on relative to its unencumbered assets.

Too much debt can hurt dividends in two ways. First, the lenders get payment priority over the shareholders. If a company runs into a cash crunch, its dividends will be among the first things to go. That's why automakers like Ford (NYSE: F  ) cut their payments back when their businesses started deteriorating a couple years back. Shareholders might complain, but unpaid debtholders can take over a company.

In addition, when that debt matures, it will either need to be rolled over into new debt or paid in full. If a company can't borrow to pay off its maturing debt and can't pay it off with cash on hand, even a profitable business can be forced into bankruptcy.

Can you separate the best from the rest?
While 2008's numerous dividend implosions serve as reminders that dividends are never guaranteed payments, companies with strong financials are far less likely to have to slash theirs.

Some good rules of thumb to consider:

  • A payout ratio less than 67% shows both that the company is profitable, and that it has the temperament to put some of those profits away for a rainy day.
  • A quick ratio greater than 1.0 means the company has the ability to cover all the debt that's coming due within a year.
  • A debt-to-equity ratio less than 2.0 reduces the odds that the company will either be overwhelmed by interest payments or run into a financing crunch when its debt matures.

Here are a handful of firms that pass those tests today:

Company

Payout Ratio

Quick Ratio

Debt to Equity Ratio

Dividend Yield

Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM  )

31.1%

4.6

0.8%

1.8%

Robert Half International (NYSE: RHI  )

23.5%

2.1

0.4%

2.5%

Tootsie Roll (NYSE: TR  )

42.2%

2.0

1.2%

1.4%

Administaff (NYSE: ASF  )

24.4%

1.1

0.3%

2.6%

American Ecology (Nasdaq: ECOL  )

54.5%

2.7

0.0%

3.6%

While the sustainability of a firm's dividend isn't the only reason you would pull the trigger on its stock, it's one sign that a company deserves a further look.

It's time to buy quality
Research by Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel demonstrates that reinvested dividends are key to strong long-term returns -- and that means finding dividend stocks you can count on. Starting with the three metrics outlined above, and following them up with in-depth research into the company's balance sheet, competitive advantage, and management, will help you find stocks for the long haul.

At Motley Fool Income Investor, our goal is to help investors build a portfolio of companies that pay strong, reliable dividends. By paying attention to the fundamentals behind the businesses we select, we've managed to help our members both keep steady income streams and stay ahead of this tumultuous market. If you're ready to escape from the chaos that this market has brought with it, and focus your investments on companies with staying and paying power, just click here for a free 30-day trial. There's no obligation to subscribe.

At the time of publication, Fool contributor Chuck Saletta did not directly own shares of any company mentioned in this article, but his wife owned shares of General Growth Properties. Administaff is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems Pay Dirt pick, as well as an Inside Value recommendation. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2009, at 10:38 AM, pondee619 wrote:

    The stocks cited don't offer a stellar dividend yield, do they. A tax free mini bond fund pays close, or over 6%, a TIPS pays close to the referenced average yield over the inflation rate.

    Perhaps you could run your "rules ot thumb" with some companies that pay a dividend that is above the norm. Those companies would be worth a closer look.

    Thanks:

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2009, at 10:44 AM, SteveTheInvestor wrote:

    Personally, I don't view div yields below 3% as very relevant. Owning stocks means exposure to significant risk. Considering that I can get 4.5% in an insured account, I have no interest in trivial dividends. I grow tired of becoming less wealthy every day by owning stocks and am far better off in cash.

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2009, at 7:25 PM, Art332 wrote:

    Master Limited Partnerships (MLPs) are excellent income generators. Some pay over 10% annual dividends tax-free. Why not recommend some of the oil, gas or co2 pipeline MLPs, especially a few of the best, like KMP or TCLP?

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2009, at 8:15 PM, trenton1ryan wrote:

    I'm with you Art332.

    I'd throw in OKS, EPD, PAA, and ETP too. Why waste your money's time in 1-3% yields when you can be a part of the energy scene and get 7-10%.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 12:15 AM, TMFDiogenes wrote:

    Awesome question, Steve and Trenton. I personally don't get excited by yields below 3% either, but some people find low dividends can be appealing so long as the company is increasing them rapidly and has a low payout ratio (meaning it has the ability to keep increasing payouts.) QCOM, for example, pays out 1.8%, but has increased its dividend by 42% for the past 5 years. That can really add up.

    Todd's written a great article on this topic:

    http://www.fool.com/investing/dividends-income/2009/01/22/10...

    Ilan

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 1:26 AM, TerryHogan wrote:

    Sometimes you don't get many warnings. I had the misfortune to pick up PFE last week when it was yielding just about 8%, then got the big chop this week. But I have to agree with Diogenes on this one, it's not just the yield right now, but the growth in the yield that give you huge returns in the long run.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 4:38 AM, GimliJan wrote:

    Art and Trenton,

    Thanks for the comments about MLP's. I am in KMP and also TPP. Teppco Limited. I was going to look at PAA. Glad to get any information anyone has on MLP's.

    I also got hit with Dryships and Freeport McMoran cutting their dividends.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 3:33 PM, MichaelNW wrote:

    Why use quick ratio instead of current ratio?

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 8:08 PM, drmcnabb wrote:

    Thanks for the article. I can find most of these stats on the "Profile/Key Stats" pages at the fool. However, I can't quite figure out the debt-to-equity ratio. It doesn't seem to fit with the available information. For example: QCOM shows Quick Ratio 4.60; Current Ratio 5.10; LT Debt/ Equity 0.00; Total Debt / Equity 0.01; Sept 2008 Total Liabilities = 6,619.00M and Total Equity = 17,944.00M. Your chart shows: 0.8.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 8:34 PM, TMFBigFrog wrote:

    MichaelNW:

    I picked the quick ratio instead of the current ratio because the quick ratio backs out inventory. In times of tight credit and sluggish sales, it's very tough to turn inventory into cash. If you can't sell it and nobody is willing to use it as collateral for a loan, then it sits there collecting dust and costing you storage and warehousing fees, rather than earning you money.

    ---

    drmcnabb:

    That's a good question. It looks like Qualcomm's D/E ratio getting overstated like that was due to a feed error in the screening tool I used to generate that chart. My calculations using the company's 10-K ( http://idea.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/804328/0000936392080... ) puts it closer to 0.008 than 0.8. I'll put in a request to the editors to see if they can fix that issue.

    Best regards,

    -Chuck

  • Report this Comment On February 04, 2009, at 9:24 PM, TMFBigFrog wrote:

    Hi truthisntstupid,

    Thank you for your service to our country.

    That's a good question... In my opinion, what makes the newsletters valuable is a 1-2-3 punch. It's a combination of:

    * The continuing education about a strategy with legitimate long-run potential to be successful,

    * The community of like-minded individuals who are all learning together and providing feedback and analysis on the members-only discussion boards as their own educations continue, and

    * The more in-depth analysis and discussion about the selections the newsletters make.

    I appreciate that you view these articles as providing valuable information. I and at least two editors per piece put a lot of work into writing and publishing the ones with my name on them. I certainly wouldn't waste my time, theirs, or yours, with something I didn't think was a legitimate value-add.

    The thing about these articles, though, is that they have to be rather short to attract online readers and actually be read in Internet Time. That means we rarely get the chance to fully discuss a point or flesh out the finer points of an idea or a concept. In the newsletters and on the private discussion boards, however, we have quite a bit more liberty to discuss topics in depth. Even better, to my way of thinking, the discussion boards provide us a chance to have better two, three, or 682-way conversations. From my perspective as a perpetual student of investing, that itself makes the Fool -- and its newsletters -- a valuable place to be (and hang my own jester cap, as long as they keep me around.)

    Regards,

    -Chuck

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 818728, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/24/2012 3:54:28 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,516.66 20.51 0.16%
S&P 500 1,319.03 0.17 0.01%
NASD 2,834.45 -15.67 -0.55%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/24/2012 3:39 PM
QCOM $57.00 Down -1.14 -1.96%
Qualcomm, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
RHI $28.60 Down -0.13 -0.45%
Robert Half Intern… CAPS Rating: ***
TR $22.30 Down -0.06 -0.27%
Tootsie Roll Indus… CAPS Rating: *
NSP $25.03 Up +0.22 +0.89%
Insperity CAPS Rating: ****
ECOL $17.13 Down -0.19 -1.10%
US Ecology, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
F $10.57 Up +0.16 +1.49%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GGP $16.88 Down -0.06 -0.35%
General Growth Pro… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement