7 Stocks to Start You Off

Recs

50

Why should late-night DJs get to offer all the dedications? I hereby dedicate this article to newcomers to the investing arena, to people who've freed up some cash to invest, and to those who understand that this sluggish stock market presents them with a rare and exciting opportunity.

If you're ready to invest, you may be facing one big question: which stocks to start with. After all, there are thousands to choose from. You could take the easy (and quite reasonable) route and invest in a broad-market index fund. Even investing great Warren Buffett believes most people are better off following that strategy.

But to aim even higher, you may want to put some or all of your money in individual stocks. And in my opinion, healthy dividend payers could be the best place to start your search.

Start with reliability
To look for the cream of the crop in the dividend world, take a gander at Standard & Poor's list of Dividend Aristocrats. (My colleague Joe Magyer offers some other excellent dividend-seeking tips.)

The Aristocrats are S&P 500 companies that have increased their dividends every year for at least 25 years. Here are some Aristocrats you might consider for your portfolio, along with their dividend growth rates:

Company

Recent Dividend Yield

5-Year Average Annual Dividend Growth Rate

ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM)

2.4%

10%

Automatic Data Processing (Nasdaq: ADP)

3.7%

18%

Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO)

3.5%

12%

Walgreen (NYSE: WAG)

1.5%

21%

Eli Lilly (NYSE: LLY)

5.7%

7%

Johnson Controls (NYSE: JCI)

2.7%

17%

McDonald's (NYSE: MCD)

3.6%

32%

Sources: Standard & Poor's, MSN Money.

When evaluating dividend payers, consider more than just the current yield. A company offering a yield of 5% might seem more attractive than a company of seemingly equal quality paying 3%. But if the former company features irregular and anemic dividend increases, while the latter has averaged 12% annual hikes, that 3% will become more than a 5% effective yield for you in just a few years. And over 10 or 20 years, that accumulation could really pack a punch.

What makes dividends so important?
It's not exactly a secret: Dividends accounted for 41% of the S&P 500's return between 1926 and 2006. And according to Ned Davis Research, between January 1972 and April 2009 (a period that included booms and busts), dividend payers returned 7.8% annually, crushing the 0.7% annual return of stingier stocks.

Even if their stock itself stalls, healthy, growing companies -- like the Aristocrats above -- will keep paying you their dividend. During 2008, many solid companies actually increased their dividends.

The seven stocks I've listed for you aren't formal recommendations -- just good starting points for your own due diligence. Nor are they the only dividend candidates for your portfolio. We'd love to introduce you to some other ideas, along with some valuable lessons in dividend investing, with a free 30-day trial to our Motley Fool Income Investor advisory service. On average, its picks are beating the market handily, even as they offer an average current yield of 5.5%. Nineteen of our recommendations sport yields above 6%! Click here to learn more about a free 30-day trial (there's no obligation to subscribe).

Already an Income Investor subscriber? Log in at the top of this page.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Coca-Cola and McDonald's. Coca-Cola is a Motley Fool Inside Value and Motley Fool Income Investor selection. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2009, at 10:43 AM, stockplus wrote:

    You Fools,

    You tout Coca-cola. It is a dead money stock. Just because you hold the stock, you are mentioning it here. How much money have you made in this trash in the last ten years? You probably bought the damn thing at 80 some 10-11 years ago, Now you have guts to cite it here. Shame on you.

    This stock has gone from 37.44 (hit on March 5, 2009) to close at 47.30 on May 22, 2009.

    It is time to sell the damn thing and put money elsewhere like T and VZ which are yielding about 7% and T has fallen about 12% this month to make it a good buy.

    KO is dead money and you are unscupulously grinding your own axe. Sell you clothes even put your pennies in this trash.

    You should have some sense for God sake

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2009, at 10:44 AM, stockplus wrote:

    KO is dead money. Sell the stock

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2009, at 11:03 AM, stockplus wrote:

    More on Coke.

    KO earned about 2 bucks a share 12 years ago. It is projected to earn about 3 bucks this year. This is 3.5% annual growth rate. What should one pay for this growth. I think it clear that coke is selling at an inflated price. Yes, it a good name but we have to reasonable. To put in plain and simple way KO should trade in the 30-35 range. Period.

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2009, at 9:56 PM, catoismymotor wrote:

    I think I hear a dead horse being beaten.

  • Report this Comment On May 24, 2009, at 9:33 AM, stockplus wrote:

    O, Yes, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stern etc. were also leading advisors until last September. And we are not learning anything from history.

    Coke's anemic growth rate of 3.5% (IF that also is achieved in future) does not warrant this kind of multiple. The recent jump in price is due to percieved weaknes in US dollar, but that is overblown.

    Time to dump it and take money from this stock. Period.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 4:10 AM, lordmorgul wrote:

    @stockplus, so have you been burned badly by holding KO or is this just random rant going on here? How about a little disclosure if you feel so strongly on it.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 8:11 AM, stockplus wrote:

    Disclosure: Social Responsibility. In US the health care costs are rising rapidly. We are facing new problems of diabetes in children. Why is that happening? It is no rocket science here. Answer is our eating habits and consumption/promotion of junk foods. Coke promotes its carbonated and sugary water which contributes to these health problems. Sometimes we weigh pros and cons of things. But in this case there is no positive side of this junk drink. Its promotion is depleting our pockets when we have to start putting kids on medicine for health problems. I can keep on going here but you got the point. We have to control junk food for a better life.

    From the investor’s point of view, we should exercise discernment. We should not encourage escalation of stuff that is hazardous to health.

    From the sole point of making money as well I have a point here. Mr. Buffett is a very wise man. I have very high regards for him for many reasons. That said, I don’t agree with him on his Coke’s holding. He has been holding 200 million shares of coke bought at a low base price. Actually he bought 25 million shares way back and the stock spilt in the nineties earned him his current pile. Health and diabetic problems in children were not that conspicuous at that time and people were touting junk foods like coke. The stock traded in the 80+ range in late nineties. IF Mr. Buffett had plainly dumped his coke holding at that time simply because of undue and irrational appreciation in price, and put that money in a money market account or certificate of deposit he would have done his Berkshire Hathaway shareholders a big favor. I think if he does it now, he may surely be ahead in 10 years. Awareness against junk is increasing. Simply sticking to silly philosophy in some cases is no good.

    Now we are facing challenges to control health costs and for this healthy living should be promoted. How much junk food and drinks should we consume? Coke’s management will not do anything to help the cause. Investors and consumers can certainly play a role and they MUST.

    Dump coke and discourage its promotion.

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 10:20 PM, mcvd01 wrote:

    Check out the daily updated list of highest dividend yielding NASDAQ and Dow Jones stocks:

    http://www.TopYields.nl

  • Report this Comment On May 25, 2009, at 10:43 PM, kellogg9 wrote:

    Yay! I was one of the lucky ones who got into ExonMobil and McDonalds a bit earlier. However it doesnt help that i got killed on some foreign stocks which now when i see it i am actually in the whle for the year..but still at least this article made me smile a bit

    Kelly - http://www.stockcoupons.com/

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2009, at 12:58 PM, mpendragon wrote:

    What Coke has is the ability to move and distribute potable liquid anywhere in the world better than anyone else and they have one of the top brands in the world. Coke's future doesn't, or shouldn't, depend on it's ability to market flavored, carbonated sugar water or some new line of sports drinks.

    In developing nations the growing number of wealthy elite aren't going to want to drink from the same local water supply that regularly kills children via water born illness or other contamination. If Coke can improve/maintain their safety standards in China and India and the Philippines and Latin America and Eastern Europe and the Middle East then they can continue to grow and profit for decades.

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2009, at 5:56 PM, AubieFool wrote:

    Stockplus,

    So, if only Coke's dividend yield was higher you could look the other way regarding "Social Responsibility"? Who's next on your hit list? MO, perhaps? MCD? How about the REALLY evil one - XOM!? Bwa, ha, ha. You ask "how much "junk" food and drinks should we consume?" Gee, I don't know. Let the government decide 'cause we're waaay too stupid to fend for ourselves. Get out of my portfolio, nanny stater.

  • Report this Comment On June 12, 2009, at 11:53 AM, wolfman225 wrote:

    Not to pile on, but I have to weigh in on the bashing of KO. As someone else mentioned, the different soda brands are not all that KO is involved in. In fact, they are one of the largest suppliers of bottled, filtered water in the world. As far as "social responsibility", give me a break! That's nothing more than a code phrase allowing ever more government control over our daily lives/activities. Be sure to let me know how much of a comfort your sense of moral superiority is when you start paying all the additional taxes that'll be required to pay for the food police, the new food (or nutritional) csar, etc.

    It's not Cokes fault (or MCD's, or Pizza Hut's, or Pepsi's) that Americans as a whole are much more overweight and out of shape than we were 20 yrs ago, people are simply making poor choices. Our personal dietary habits ought never be under the control of any government entity. Maybe, just maybe, if we were to quit subsidising poor health habits with "free" medical care, personal responsibility would make a comeback. In the meantime, I'll continue to buy KO, and others in it's industry, as long as they remain a viable investment vehicle.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 905952, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 2:32:30 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
XOM $72.85 Up +0.69 +0.96%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
MCD $62.64 Up +0.92 +1.49%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
KO $55.48 Up +0.99 +1.82%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
JCI $26.62 Up +0.39 +1.49%
Johnson Controls,… CAPS Rating: ****
ADP $42.95 Up +0.63 +1.49%
Automatic Data Pro… CAPS Rating: ****
LLY $35.32 Up +0.82 +2.38%
Eli Lilly & Co. CAPS Rating: ****
WAG $40.04 Up +0.47 +1.19%
Walgreen Company CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Enterprise value: Enterprise value is the value of a company, incorporating equity, debt, and cash. It is essentially a way of measuring what it would cost to buy the company. Also often called total enterprise value (TEV).

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!