Have Patent, Will Sue

Recs

2

No one expects reforms to happen overnight. Particularly when the U.S. government and the entire tech industry deal with the tangled nuances of patent law, positive changes in the system will naturally be slow in coming.

But in the meantime, companies continue to use and abuse patent rights to go after competitors -- or after any entity with deep enough pockets. While many of the industry's larger players, such as Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) and Broadcom (Nasdaq: BRCM), are tangled in more legitimate beefs over patent infringement related to their products, some companies employing only a few lawyers and developing no products continue to sue indiscriminately.

And the cost of damages seems to know no limits. The industry marveled at the $612 million Research In Motion (Nasdaq: RIMM) ended up paying to scrappy patent prosecutor NTP, but that's nothing compared with what some are asking for. Nokia (NYSE: NOK) recently got slapped with a lawsuit demanding -- get this -- at least $17.7 billion. The complainant in this case is a German company called IP-Com, bankrolled by Fortress Investment Group (NYSE: FIG).

Then there's small holding company Minerva Industries, which sued dozens of companies, including Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL), Motorola (NYSE: MOT), and Samsung, over a just-issued broad patent with 125 claims covering many basic features of a smartphone. And just in case you figured NTP's windfall payment from RIM was enough to make it go away, guess again.

All of this suing makes a few things obvious to me. First, patent shakedowns will continue as long as there are patents, because the financial incentive exists. Second, any aspiring college graduate who can withstand the tough curriculum of law should strongly consider it as a career choice, because patent lawyers and attorneys probably have more long-term job security than do folks in any other profession.

Seriously, though, litigation surrounding patents has become an increasingly large cost of doing business, particularly in the wireless world. High-stakes litigation results can also significantly skew the competitive environment and success -- or doom -- of companies. Investors need to consider carefully the legal risks of companies they own, particularly if any are smaller fish navigating a pool of sharks.

For more Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 567195, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 7:11:46 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
MOT $8.28 Down -0.20 -2.36%
Motorola, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
NOK $13.33 Down -0.28 -2.06%
Nokia Corp (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $199.92 Down -0.59 -0.29%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
BRCM $28.76 Down -0.40 -1.37%
Broadcom Corp CAPS Rating: ***
QCOM $45.10 Up +0.01 +0.02%
Qualcomm, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
RIMM $59.72 Up +0.88 +1.50%
Research In Motion… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Earnings yield: Earnings yield is the inverse of price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!