Don't Average Down

Recs

7

I'm annoyed. I invested in Starbucks (Nasdaq: SBUX) a few months ago, because the price seemed attractive, but the stock has tanked since then. I'm down some 37% as I type this. I'm also down 39% on Fuel-Tech (Nasdaq: FTEK), and 26% on General Electric (NYSE: GE). Ouch!

Do I want to sell my shares now? Not really. I still have faith in the companies. I still think that they'll reward me over time. Given this point of view, many investors might urge me to "average down" now -- buying more shares of the stocks, so that my average cost basis drops. 

How averaging down works
Let's say I bought 100 shares of General Electric at $38 each. Simplifying matters a bit and excluding commissions, my cost basis, for tax purposes, would be $38 per share. With the stock recently trading around $28 per share, I'm looking at a $10-per-share loss right now.

Now if I buy 100 more shares, at $28 apiece, I would own a total of 200 shares. Having paid $3,800 for the first 100 and $2,800 for the new shares, I've spent a total of $6,600, for an average price of $33 per share. That's why it's called "averaging down" -- my average price has fallen. So it now looks like I'm only down $5 per share, on average.

You might think that I've improved my situation by doing this, but upon some reflection, I really don't think I have. That's because I think of my first investment as a sunk cost. It's a done deal -- I spent that money, buying those shares at that price.

It depends...
Buying the extra shares can make sense -- or not. If General Electric shares are the most attractive ones I can find, given whatever research I've done, then it can be smart to buy some more. But if some other company's stock looks even more attractive, I'd be better off buying some of those shares. Just because I own some shares of GE bought at a higher price earlier doesn't automatically make GE a more sensible investment.

The most rational way to think about whether to buy more shares is to forget about my first purchase in that stock. It's a sunk cost -- money spent that can't be unspent. Putting those first GE shares out of my mind, I should just look at the universe of possible investments, and choosing the best one -- the one (or ones) most likely to reward me well.

Even if I buy more shares of GE, I shouldn't think of it as averaging down, but instead as simply making an additional investment -- "adding on," maybe.

Tax considerations
If you do buy multiple sets of shares of stock, know that when it comes time to sell, if you want to sell just some of the shares (let's say 100 of your 200), you can't simply average them to arrive at your cost basis. That's right -- the IRS doesn't recognize the term "averaging down" when it comes to your gains and losses in stocks. Learn more about the tax rules for selling part of a stock holding in this Roy Lewis article.

Final thoughts
Here are two last thoughts against averaging down. First, in a sense, by merging your second investment in the stock with your first (at least in your mind), you won't give yourself full credit if the price rises slightly. Instead of thinking that you have a $33 cost basis, why not just think of having a $28 basis and a $38 basis? That way, when the stock rises to, say, $32, you can smile at your 14% gain on your second purchase, instead of seeing all your shares as still being underwater.

And finally, beware -- when a stock keeps falling, sometimes it's doing so for a good reason. Snapping up more shares works out really well when a fallen stock recovers. But it can also be a bad move if the stock never changes direction, or takes ages to turn around. Study a company carefully before rushing for seconds. Some investors jumped into more Krispy Kreme (NYSE: KKD) shares when they dipped from nearly $50 apiece to $40. But then they fell to $30, $20, $10, and got all the way down to nearly $2. Stocks such as Sara Lee (NYSE: SLE), Brunswick (NYSE: BC), and Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD) have fallen by half or more over the past few years -- enough to cause much pain to investors. Some stocks that look like values are really just value traps.

If you'd like to zero in on some seemingly undervalued stocks, I invite you to check out our Motley Fool Inside Value newsletter. A free trial will give you access to all past issues and all recommendations.

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Longtime Fool contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Starbucks, General Electric, and Fuel-Tech. Starbucks is a Motley Fool Inside Value and Motley Fool Stock Advisor pick. The Fool owns shares of Starbucks. Try our investing newsletters free for 30 days. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2008, at 12:06 PM, abFatPitch wrote:

    But you've really not explained how to avoid value traps which is the one time you wouldn't want to average down. If your original thesis is intact, buying more of the same company can make the best investment and even more money. I believe Buffett agrees.

    ab

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2008, at 12:46 PM, SDavidRoss wrote:

    Cost-averaging can work in a couple of ways, especially for dividend-paying stocks. While I agree that it's better to put money in a new company than waste it on a mistake, companies like GE and SLE that look like they'll bounce will allow you to cost-average, and sell the more expensive shares when the price returns to that level. This way you have the number of shares you wanted, but at a lower price. If you sell the more expensive shares at no profit, Uncle Sam won't care.

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2008, at 1:30 PM, kurtdabear wrote:

    I agree with the previous posters. If you liked a sound stock at full price, why not buy more when it's on sale (unless something has drastically changed)? (Sometimes this even works in not-so-sound, value traps--averaging down is the only way I got out of Calpine without a loss.) In addition, if you're trading in a taxable account, you don't even have to wait till you get back to even to sell high-priced shares: You can sell them at a loss and get a tax write-off while holding unrealized gains in your lower-priced shares since the IRS uses FIFO accounting for tax reporting purposes. (Just make sure you don't inadvertently trigger a "wash sale" adjustment by buying low and selling at a loss inside a 60-day window.)

  • Report this Comment On July 21, 2008, at 4:20 PM, Relmhill wrote:

    Sometimes the market is wrong about a stock, and if the fundamentals remain strong, you should average down because it's a gift from Mr Market.

    Example: During the dot-com mania the market thought brick and mortar stores were done for, and companies that built shopping centers, such as DDR, fell approx. 50%. I added to my position from 20 down to 11 until I had about 25% of my capital in DDR. It eventually turned around and went to 40, and I had a big gift from Mr Market.

  • Report this Comment On July 22, 2008, at 6:33 AM, danmiddleton999 wrote:

    Market timing is a difficult thing to master, and most of us shouldn't even try.

    If after your research you felt GE was a good long term investment at $38. And nothing has materially changed since then, other than the price you can buy it for, then it is now a screaming bargain and you should load up.

    I have several stocks in this situation right now and I am adding to BMY, HD, and T because I feel very secure that 5 years from now these boys will be back big time.

  • Report this Comment On February 18, 2009, at 4:14 PM, Aujla007 wrote:

    Let's say you own 1000 shares of a company, and the price of the shares falls down, can't you just buy more shares and bring the average down and then sell off those shares you just bought for that same price or higher, and still keep that price that bought shares with to bring the price average down???

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 688725, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 12:30:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/10/2009 12:03 PM
GE $15.63 Down -0.22 -1.39%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
FTEK $10.59 Up +0.05 +0.47%
Fuel Tech, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
SBUX $21.23 Up +0.13 +0.62%
Starbucks Corp CAPS Rating: **
KKD $3.37 Down -0.01 -0.30%
Krispy Kreme Dough… CAPS Rating: *
SLE $11.94 Up +0.07 +0.59%
Sara Lee Corp. CAPS Rating: ***
AMD $5.11 Down -0.11 -2.02%
Advanced Micro Dev… CAPS Rating: **
BC $11.46 Down -0.05 -0.43%
Brunswick Corp CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Chief Executive Officer: The Chief Executive Officer is the top-ranking executive officer of a corporation.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!