Mother Merrill Blows Her Top

Recs

3

There's good news and bad news for financial stocks.

The good news: Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) isn't playing games anymore, deciding to dump more than $30 billion in mortgage-related assets in a move to rid itself of as many sickly holdings as possible.

The bad news: It did so at less than fire-sale prices, and it must now raise billions of dollars in capital because of the sale. That's no good for other financial companies hoping for a rebound anytime soon.

The floodgates open
According to the Wall Street Journal, Merrill agreed to dump more than $30 billion in assets at -- no joke -- $0.22 on the dollar. It had been holding the securities on its books at a higher price, leaving a writedown of at least $5.7 billion on the horizon. As a result of this all-out-surrender strategy, Merrill will sell $8.5 billion in stock, diluting existing shareholders by an agonizing 38%. Yowzas.

Surprisingly, Merrill's stock didn't move too much Tuesday morning; it was even in the green at one point. Like a huge sigh of relief, the stock's subdued reaction is indication that investors couldn't give a hoot about how much capital has to be raised, or how much the losses will eventually total. They just want these CDO shenanigans buried once and for all.

What it means for everyone else
Perhaps Merrill's doomsday debt scenarios are finally finished. Unfortunately, its actions signal that financial markets as a whole are, yes, probably about as bad as the naysayers predicted they'd be.

As Fool contributor Sham Gad noticed last December, when E*Trade (Nasdaq: ETFC) had to dump assets at $0.27 on the dollar, CDOs are extremely hard to price. Assets are worth what someone is willing to pay for them, and Merrill's move sends a clear message to other financial firms: These things are worth diddly-squat.

That could mean plenty more pain, especially for firms like Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH), Citigroup (NYSE: C), and UBS (NYSE: UBS), which continue to run around in circles writing down assets and raising capital to cover the losses of their love affair with CDOs.

The bottom line
You can look at this situation two ways: Either Merrill is a big scaredy-cat, dumping assets for much less than they're worth, or Merrill is the smart one, realizing that the true value of these assets is a pittance of what others are holding out for.

With real estate prices in the gutter, interest rates threatening to move higher, and an economic upturn nowhere in view, I'm sticking with the latter.

For related Foolishness:

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 29, 2008, at 5:54 PM, weiwentg wrote:

    I think it's hard to say whether or not Merrill was right to dump its CDOs. a company with an iron stomach and loads of capital could very well have held to maturity and come out a lot less bruised.

    however, there's also the problem that the performance of the CDOs is linked to the performance of the broader economy. and the health of the financial sector is definitely connected to the health of the economy.

    so, lets hope Merrill did the right thing, and that it will put its capital to a lot better use.

  • Report this Comment On July 30, 2008, at 12:08 AM, Ozcutty wrote:

    I don't see how selling assetts at 22c on the dollar and diluting your shares by 38% can be a good thing.

    Obviously the people buying the CDO's think they will make lots of money.

    It smacks of short term thinking on behalf of management.

    However, judging by the way the shares rallied today looks like Wall Street likes it.

    However if in the future these CDO's are worth a lot more, anyone holding them will be able to write up the value which will produce huge gains for shareholders. MEL won't have that luxury.

    I am personally more interesting in companies which are thinking long term, holding onto assetts for recovery and reducing shares outstanding with buy backs at depressed prices.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 695323, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 4:27:24 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 3:53 PM
C $4.21 Down -0.07 -1.64%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
LEH $0.13 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Lehman Brothers Ho… CAPS Rating: *
MER $11.64 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Merrill Lynch & Co… CAPS Rating: *
UBS $16.10 Down -0.11 -0.68%
UBS AG (USA) CAPS Rating: **
ETFC $1.60 Down -0.04 -2.44%
E*Trade Financial… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Two and twenty: Two and twenty or 2 and 20 (or other such variants) refers to a common hedge fund compensation structure.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!