Airlines Are a Screaming Value

Recs

7

Sorry if I disappoint you, but it's not airline stocks that I think are screaming values. It's the services the airlines provide that are ridiculously cheap.

If you haven't heard, the airline industry is in the pits. The price of fuel, pension costs, aging fleets, you name it ... the airlines basically have nothing going in their favor. Mind you, this is nothing new: I always enjoyed Richard Branson's brutal honesty when asked how to become a millionaire: "There's really nothing to it," he said. "Start as a billionaire, and then buy an airline." Caveat emptor, I guess.

Mayday, mayday!
One thing's certain: Not to state the obvious, but the airlines' revenues aren't enough to cover their towering costs. Save for a return to dirt-cheap oil (fat chance), there's only one way to get the industry back on a stable track: Raise ticket prices.

And just how high can those fares rise? Some say they can't go much higher because the industry is so fiercely competitive -- there's just no room for pricing power. That's true, but it doesn't mean prices can't rise -- it just means that swarms of carriers will be forced out of business until competition mellows out. There's no way around it: Prices will rise, and they'll rise a lot.

How do I know? Because measured against the alternatives, air travel is so insanely cheap it almost defies logic.

You are now free to move about the alternatives
Take a simple example: the cost of flying from Los Angeles to New York. Of course, the cost varies by day and time, but the last time I checked, it appeared that nonstop service from LAX to JFK would set you back in the neighborhood of $350, including booking fees and taxes. Throw in the cost of checking your second bag and a cab ride to the airport, and we'll call it $400.

The best way to wrap your head around how much the airlines could charge is by comparing the costs to the closest alternatives. Unless you're this guy, that means driving, taking a bus, or riding a train. Mapquest tells me that the trip from L.A. to New York by car will take 42 hours of driving time and cover 2,788 miles. Assuming gas costs $4 a gallon and your car gets 25 MPG, fuel alone will set you back $445. That's before you get into hotel and food costs. Assuming your time is worth anything to you, driving clearly isn't an option for the solo traveler. From this point of view, it's clear that airfares could run up in a huge way and still be a screaming value.

How about other methods? On Amtrak, the trip could set you back as little as a couple of hundred backs ... and take you two and a half days to get there. Similar deal on Greyhound. And those pesky airline baggage fees that are taking so much flak? It'd cost you more than $300 to ship a 50-pound bag overnight through a courier. Take your pick.

Get the point? Good. Now stop complaining.
The bottom line is that air travel should be more expensive than it is today. Without higher fares, the airlines will go bankrupt, and in the wake of higher fares, those who have to travel don't have much of a choice. When an industry is losing billions of dollars and the next best alternative is unreasonable, customers don't have bargaining power on their side.

Prices haven't gone up dramatically yet because -- wonder of all wonders -- airlines are still scraping together enough cash to stay in business and, hence, remain competitive. Once that situation ends, and it will, the survivors will start raising fares en masse. They have to. The industry is expected to lose $6.1 billion this year alone. There's no reason to think the survivors can't raise prices to the point at which travel is competitive with the alternatives -- or at least raise them to a competitive profitable rate. In the long run, that's how efficient markets work. No industry can continue indefinitely on negative cash flow.

Air travel 2.0
Out of the larger carriers -- America's AMR (NYSE: AMR), United's UAL (Nasdaq: UAUA), Continental (NYSE: CAL), Southwest (NYSE: LUV), JetBlue (Nasdaq: JBLU), Northwest (NYSE: NWA), and US Airways (NYSE: LCC) -- it's crazy to think that at least some of them won't bite the dust. And the ones that do survive are likely to become just a wee fraction of their former selves. For the consumer already battling the chains of inflation, it's crazy to think that cheap travel will be around much longer. All around, there's little to get excited about in the airline industry.

Yes, air travel is a screaming bargain now. Don't expect that to last much longer. Am I wrong? Let me have it in the comment section below.

For related Foolishness:

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. He appreciates your questions, comments, and complaints. The Fool's disclosure policy always flies first class.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2008, at 10:18 AM, dhavis wrote:

    I have to respectfully disagree. Yes, with oil at it's current levels or higher, airfare will obviously have to double for airlines to make any money.

    But if you haven't noticed, oil is dropping like a Led Zeppelin and should go under $80 a barrel by years end if the trend continues. If you recall airlines were profitable at $80 a barrel in 2007.

    Now if you add in the cuts they have made to staff, planes and routes, plus add in the additional fees they are charging airlines and rate increases, they should return to profitablitliy around $100 a barrel oil.

    All that without doubling the price of a ticket. Sure it will cost more to fly, but not an insane amount.

    I think airlines should chage for additional services like water or cokes or food on a flight. You don't go to the ballpark and expect free food and water, why should you expect it on an airplane??

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2008, at 10:19 AM, andyuscum wrote:

    Thanks for bringing to light the fact that air travel is too cheap and showing the comparison to driving. I have stated that same point several times in postings all over the web. Airlines need to raise fares to make money and use the advertising phrase " If you don't like our prices than drive!"

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2008, at 10:34 AM, jeffrjohns wrote:

    No, you are not wrong at all, but what also must be considered is the bloated ineffeciency, corruption, waste, and horrifically bad management that compounds the problems you articulate.

    On a recent trip, a fellow flyer told me that the cab ride to the airport cost him more than his round tirp ticket from Los Angeles to Las Vegas cost. Another anecdotal example is that cab fare from Manhattan to JFK can run about ninety dollars - the cost of a JetBlue ticket from JFK to Long Beach at one point. The difference here is that one industry (taxis) is charging enough to cover costs and make a profit, and another industry (airlines) is not.

    With the exception of Southwest management, that spent the last few years hedging fuel in anticipation of the current run-up in fuel costs, airline managements have wasted millions bolstering their own ranks while cutting the number of people on the front line who actually make the airline run. (Don't forget that while Southwest was hedging fuel contracts in 1999/2000, United, for example, was busy trying to buy USAir for $60 a share).

    I defy any one to take a look at the lengthy list of executives and senior vice presidents filling out the offices of United's new downtown Chicago digs and tell me what they do each day to make the operation profitable. There are more than four dozen of these people with titles like Vice President of Aircraft Appearance and VP of Corporate Identity! Is it any wonder this industry is in constant financial straits?

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2008, at 4:06 PM, tp2006 wrote:

    Manhattan to JFK is $45 plus tip and toll. Nice article.

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2008, at 5:53 PM, cropter wrote:

    I work for the airlines and we've spent the last 5 years trimming the fat. I've taken a 40% pay cut and the effort to save fuel has become almost obsessive. I still won't invest in airlines, but the Fools are right about airfares. The $500 fares of today will be $1500 next year when there will be fewer carriers and many fewer airline seats. If you're thinking about a trip, take it now.

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2008, at 10:45 PM, thedofca100 wrote:

    I agree with the article and most of the comments. One very minor point - the reason you should get free water on an airplane is: 1) you can't bring your own on, they won't allow it past security. 2) Unlike baseball fields or any other ground based entertainment, the water you drink from the airplane faucet is not recirculated water, just ask the people who have gotten sick when flying back from Mexico and didn't eat the food. Water on an airline should be free until the government wakes up to the absurdity of their security checks and lets us bring water and toothpaste over 3 oz. again.

  • Report this Comment On August 07, 2008, at 3:00 PM, acroswel wrote:

    The overall point of the article is well made. Fare prices are a value. However, positing massive fare increases to make air travel price competitive with other forms of travel ignores the high price elasticity for vacations, particularly in hard economic times. The problem is that people "who have to travel" generally already pay much higher prices for last minute bookings which are often required by business travelers with constantly changing schedules. Cheap fares in general are only available to vacation travelers who have the luxury of booking well in advance. The alternative for these travelers isn't driving, taking the bus or train to the same destination, but rather picking a more affordable location, or staying home. Even moderate changes in prices for fares booked well in advance will greatly shrink demand. I'm left thinking that the only viable outcome in the near term for airlines is a huge decrease in capacity and overhead, along with a lot of layoffs.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 701152, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 6:26:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
CAL $12.77 Up +1.03 +8.77%
Continental Airlin… CAPS Rating: *
UAUA $6.96 Up +0.44 +6.75%
UAL Corp CAPS Rating: *
AMR $5.65 Up +0.23 +4.24%
AMR Corp CAPS Rating: *
NWA $9.90 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Northwest Airlines… CAPS Rating: *
LUV $8.65 Up +0.29 +3.47%
Southwest Airlines… CAPS Rating: ***
JBLU $5.24 Up +0.41 +8.49%
JetBlue Airways Co… CAPS Rating: ***
LCC $3.19 Up +0.24 +8.14%
US Airways Group,… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Buying in thirds: Buying in thirds is a time-honored Motley Fool practice, teaching investors to enter an eventual "full" stockholding in three separate lots. This is typically advisable for those who are new to investing, those who like a stock long-term but worry about its present valuation being high, and those who like to dollar-cost average.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!