Recs

1

This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." So you might think we'd be the last people to give virtual ink to such "news." And we would be -- if that were all we were doing.

But in "This Just In," we don't simply tell you what the analysts said. We'll also show you whether they know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS, our tool for rating stocks and analysts alike. With CAPS, we'll be tracking the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and brightest -- and its worst and sorriest, too.

And speaking of the best ...
Like everything else in the investing universe yesterday, shares of chip kings Intel (Nasdaq: INTC  ) , Advanced Micro Devices (NYSE: AMD  ) , and Texas Instruments (NYSE: TXN  ) went tumbling down yesterday. Helping matters not one bit was a trio of new ratings on the Big Three, as Wall Street analyst Collins Stewart weighed in on the sector.

Not that Collins Stewart had nothing nice to say. In fact, while appending only a "hold" rating to TI, the analyst graced both Intel and AMD with brand-spanking-new "buy" ratings.

Collins argues that Intel should enjoy high-single-digit revenue growth over the . Combined with operating margins potentially surpassing the 30% level, Collins expects to see strong profits growth at the company. Note that Intel right now still falls short of earning even 26% margins on its chips, so this is a guess at long-term improvement at the company.

It's a guess, furthermore, supported by Collins' "endorsement" of AMD. To me, this one feels more like a short-term play. Collins is looking for 7% sequential revenue growth and perhaps some gains in market share as NVIDIA (Nasdaq: NVDA  ) continues working through its well-publicized packaging problems. Longer-term, though, Collins sees AMD "losing share to Intel in the core processor business."

And this merits a "buy" rating?
In the crazy, madcap world of analyst thinking, apparently it does. But beware of following Collins down this path of short-term thinking -- others who've done so have not been well rewarded. According to CAPS, fewer than 42% of Collins' stock recommendations work out for investors. The analyst ranks in the 59th percentile of CAPS members, hurt badly by such otherwise promising picks as:

Company

CS Said:

CAPS Says (5 Max):

Collins' Pick Lagging S&P 500 by:

Suntech (NYSE: STP  )

Outperform

****

9 points

First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR  )

Outperform

**

11 points

Corning (NYSE: GLW  )

Outperform

*****

23 points

Foolish takeaway
Buying into money-losing AMD on advice that includes a likely loss of market share to one rival, not to mention gains in share in another market that depend greatly on having another rival make  mistakes, doesn't seem particularly Foolish to me.

In contrast, Collins Stewart's suggestion that Intel looks interesting appears more grounded in logic. Most analysts expect Intel to achieve close to 14% long-term profits growth. Meanwhile, the stock sells for just less than 13 times its trailing free cash flow. Not exactly a huge there, I'll grant you -- but the value proposition at Intel is at least starting to look interesting.

And one final thought: If you're feeling particularly contrarian today, TI is still the stock I like best in this sector. Sure, Collins gave it only a "hold" rating yesterday. But trading for less than 9 times free cash flow, and expected to grow in excess of 14% per year over the next half-decade, TI remains your best bet for getting a piece of the chip space for a dirt-cheap price.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Intel is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection. Suntech Power is a Rule Breakers pick. NVIDIA is a Stock Advisor recommendation.

Fool contributor Rich Smith owns no shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's ranked No. 447 out of more than 115,000 players. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2008, at 8:52 PM, TEBuddy wrote:

    This is more biased gibberish from the fools. I don't agree with the analyst either that AMD will lose share to Intel.

    If everyone did their research you would know why AMD trying to understate Intel's new processor release. Intel has yet to really release it for one. Two, AMD is actually releasing production parts on their upgrade this year, using 45nm production, and will still beat Intel's in the same thing it beats them in today. AMD is already breaking all the records for computing at a better value. The new AMD cpus at 45nm will operate at least 30% less power consumption, which is very attractive for servers with 4 cpus.

    You are underestimating them again, something Intel did before.

    And as far as graphics goes, ATI has never needed Nvidia to make mistakes to have good products. People have such short memories, and ATI has consistently made well performing products. Why would you even claim ATI's current success is because of a mistake? You think the really good stuff ATI makes that performs better than the comparably priced Nvidia cards somehow has something to do with Nvidia's recent reliability problems? NO.

    AMD will post a profit this quarter, especially with the loss of the money sucking TV business, plus the increase due to that sale making it like a $400M flip, and there went a lot of the employees AMD said they would need to trim.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 721864, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/15/2012 5:24:34 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 7 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,878.28 4.24 0.03%
S&P 500 1,350.50 -1.27 -0.09%
NASD 2,931.83 0.44 0.02%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 4:00 PM
TXN $33.22 Down -0.04 -0.11%
Texas Instruments,… CAPS Rating: ****
INTC $26.78 Up +0.08 +0.30%
Intel Corp CAPS Rating: *****
AMD $7.32 Up +0.03 +0.41%
Advanced Micro Dev… CAPS Rating: **
NVDA $16.24 Up +0.09 +0.56%
NVIDIA Corporation CAPS Rating: *****
STP $3.44 Down -0.31 -8.27%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ***
FSLR $39.21 Down -2.51 -6.02%
First Solar CAPS Rating: **
GLW $13.48 Down -0.19 -1.39%
Corning, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement