Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



What Cloud Computing Needs

Don't let it get away!

Keep track of the stocks that matter to you.

Help yourself with the Fool's FREE and easy new watchlist service today.

You'd think it was the end of cloud computing.

No one wrote it precisely that way, but after Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) suffered three significant outages with Gmail and its other Web-based productivity software in August, pundits rained on the cloud.

"Given all of the major Web outages, Google, Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) Web Services, Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) MobileMe, I'd wait a bit before running a major business on the Internet," wrote Clint Boulton at eWEEK.

"These growing pains, which are more evident each day that we rely more on service-based software efforts, indicate that you can't really trust the cloud at this juncture," wrote ZDNet blogger Larry Dignan.

They're both correct. You can't 100% trust the cloud right now. But you're crazy if you think cloud computing isn't worth betting on as an investor. Here's why.

Mr. Online, Meet Mr. Offline
First, let's remember that outages have been occurring on the Web for more than a decade. Some notables:

  • Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) suffered one in March, on a Monday, the worst possible day for an outage because that's when customers typically update their queue for the week ahead.
  • (NYSE: CRM  ) went offline in December of 2005, infuriating users. Today, is considered a model for Web services uptime.
  • AOL made national headlines after a 19-hour outage in 1996.

Let's also remember that 3Com founder and former InfoWorld columnist Bob Metcalfe predicted that the Internet would collapse that same year. A 19-hour outage at AOL notwithstanding, Metcalfe was proven wrong.

Cloud computing suppliers and their development teams have to proceed from the idea that the Web, like any network, is going to suffer outages. Having offline access to online data is an imperative.

The good news? Three firms are working on this, two of which have a big stake in the success of the cloud: Google, Adobe (Nasdaq: ADBE  ) , and Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) .

Each approach is different:

Google. DoubleGoo has Gears, a plug-in that makes browser-based software available offline. Interestingly, the Big G hasn't positioned Gears as a remedy for downtime but as an enhancement for those times when you're on an airplane and would like access to Gmail to catch up.

Adobe. Using a runtime called AIR, Adobe takes a more comprehensive view of blending the online and offline worlds. "We don't believe that all of the technology benefits of the Web are confined to the browser," said Adrian Ludwig, group manager of Adobe's platform business unit in an interview with me.

A "runtime" is code-speak for a virtual machine through which developers dress up formal Web-aware 1s and 0s in desktop casual. Adobe's development kit provides tools to help with the coding while the runtime executes the instructions. is among many corporate Webizens to have built desktop equivalents via AIR.

Microsoft. Finally, let's give Mr. Softy his due. Microsoft has the buzzword-compliant "software + services" strategy, which includes the Silverlight toolset and runtime. You know Silverlight if you've used the SEC's interactive data features in EDGAR or streamed any of the Beijing Olympics.

Silverlight and software + services are purported to enable a seamless blend of desktop and online features. Microsoft's Office Live Workspace may be the best example; it allows for Web-based collaboration on documents created on the desktop. Synchronized Outlook access is also a feature.

Who wins among these three? I'm betting on Google because (a) it has no desktop bias, which means it can blow up any existing model it wants to and (b) I don't think we've seen even a tenth of what the Web is capable of as an application environment, but I know that Google is betting its entire business on making it more useful.

Think I'm wrong? Have a different take? Use the comments box below. I'll be back to revisit this topic, and your ideas, next week.

Get your clicks with related Foolishness:

Fool contributor Tim Beyers had positions in Google's shares and 2010 LEAPs at the time of publication. He also hunts for the best of tech as a contributor to Motley Fool Rule Breakers, which counts Google among its core holdings. Here's how to try this market-beating service free for 30 days. Get access to all of Tim's Foolish writings here.

Apple, Amazon, and Netflix are Stock Advisor selections. Microsoft is an Inside Value picks. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy longs for a little rain to usher in the forthcoming fall season.

Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 05, 2008, at 1:30 PM, oddvan wrote:

    The 123 reasons do not even make sense.

    The writer is appears to be claiming clouds will rule because other companies have had issues and are still up and running. As I say that means nothing , says nothing except perhaps the OP does not understand that past failures do not equal future wins.

    There will be no clear winner in cloud , it may very well be a race to the bottom to host services of all sorts by all vendors and a low cost.

    Why pay goog or MSFT big $ when xyz will host 100% secure for 50% of the price.

    anyone with a server farm will be allowed to play. In the comcast may as well get in the game.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 721517, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/28/2016 8:40:50 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 11 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,169.68 -29.65 -0.16%
S&P 500 2,133.04 -6.39 -0.30%
NASD 5,215.97 -34.29 -0.65%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/27/2016 4:00 PM
GOOGL $817.35 Down -4.75 -0.58%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
AAPL $114.48 Down -1.11 -0.96%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
ADBE $107.07 Down -0.90 -0.83%
Adobe Systems CAPS Rating: **
AMZN $818.36 Down -4.23 -0.51% CAPS Rating: ****
CRM $74.74 Down -0.21 -0.28% CAPS Rating: ***
MSFT $60.10 Down -0.53 -0.87%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****
NFLX $126.47 Down -0.50 -0.39%
Netflix CAPS Rating: ***