Recs

11

Netflix Threats, Netflix Opportunities

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Isn't it funny how different analysts will interpret a story in entirely different ways?

A pair of unrelated news stories have resulted in investing implications for Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) , but I don't agree with either one.

Last week, the story was Comcast's (Nasdaq: CMCSA  ) controversial move to cap residential broadband Internet usage at 250 gigabytes a month. Some wondered if Comcast has an ulterior motive, since the move will hurt companies like Netflix and Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) that are making strides in digital video delivery, which have been eating into the cable giant's pay-per-view business. Some see this as a negative for Netflix. I don't.

This week, the story is the rollout of a DVD-ripping program by RealNetworks (Nasdaq: RNWK  ) . Unlike more nefarious piracy apps, RealDVD actually retains copy-protection features. The software allows you to make an archival copy of a DVD to watch on your computer, but you can't pass it on to a buddy or burn fresh DVDs. Silicon Alley Insider sees this as a major win for Netflix. I don't.

To RealDVD or not to RealDVD
I have a one-word response to the notion that RealNetworks' $30 program will be a Netflix ally: Blockbuster (NYSE: BBI  ) . If I can have two more words: Total Access.

Blockbuster's Total Access is probably the best thing that ever happened to Netflix. When Blockbuster clenched its dagger between its teeth and jumped into a brutal pricing war with Netflix two years ago, the one thing it swiped from Netflix was its most active users.

It did Netflix a favor. The Total Access pitch of returning DVDs to a physical store to get an immediate follow-up was like honey to DVD-ripping bees. Internet boards lit up with folks who were now going through dozens of Blockbuster rentals a month, making copies of the DVDs before going back for more.

Netflix promises unlimited rentals, but it's really a model that works only if the average customer rents no more than six to eight titles a month. Since Netflix packages each new rental, pays shipping both ways, and has revenue-sharing agreements with Hollywood studios, its "unlimited" model is a loss leader for consumers who go through a ton of movies every month.

Blockbuster learned its lesson. It adjusted its prices to make sure that hyperactive store-based renters pay more than casual mail-based ones.

Now do you see why I disagree with this week's Silicon Alley Insider conclusion? If RealDVD buyers join up with Netflix, it will be to milk the company dry as they turn over their rentals a few hours after they get them. Even if Netflix has safeguards in place to slow down these whirlwinds, it's not a positive for Netflix on the bottom line.

It's Comcastic, baby
Cutting against the grain on the pro-Netflix side, I think Comcast capping its broadband usage will be great for Netflix.

Netflix is doing some pretty neat things with digital delivery. Those include streaming a reasonable chunk of its library at no additional costs to its subscribers. It may have been an infrequently used service when it was limited to PCs, but now the content Netflix streams can be seen on television through devices like Roku boxes, LG electronics, and Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) Xbox 360s.

Is capping usage a threat to digital delivery? For active consumers of high-def celluloid, sure. However, this is going to be a cutthroat industry. Microsoft is already battling companies like Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) and Amazon.com, but others are likely to come, and that includes movie studios who may want to bypass the middlemen entirely and deliver digitally directly to the end user.

Netflix has some amazing advantages. It knows its movie fans. It can turn a profit. However, if digital delivery becomes cost-prohibitive, it really pushes consumers back to DVD rentals. Who owns that space? Netflix, baby. With as many as 9.7 million subscribers by the end of this year, no one can compete with Netflix when it comes to physical home delivery of DVD rentals. If Comcast forces other broadband providers to begin metering usage, it will just drive digital Amazon and Apple customers back to Netflix.

So am I wrong? Are the others right? We're all entitled to our opinions, so I just had to go on the record with mine. Time will determine the visionaries. It always does.

Other headlines out of the weekly trash can:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Netflix, Amazon.com, and Apple are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has been a Netflix shareholder -- and subscriber -- since 2002. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 10, 2008, at 5:30 PM, JPDemers wrote:

    It seems to me that making an "archival" copy of a rental DVD is not fair use under the Copyright Act, and not something the studios, Blockbuster, or Netflix want to see happening.

    I think we'll eventually see rental DVDs that are different from retail DVDs: they'll carry DRM features that the RealDVD program recognizes, and displays a notice that "This is a rental-format DVD and cannot be copied." This might annoy honest buyers of used, formerly-rented DVDs ... but since when do the studios refrain from annoying people?

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2008, at 11:49 AM, TMFBreakerRob wrote:

    Very smart analysis, Rick!

    You motivated me to spend more time considering all the angles in lieu of jumping to a conclusion (at least with investments!).

    Thanks.

    Rob

  • Report this Comment On September 11, 2008, at 11:58 AM, lacykemp wrote:

    JP- it's not something we want to see happening either. We designed RealDVD for movies already owned by the consumer. Obviously we can not babysit people when they rent movies, but since the software is legal, we're hoping people will stick to the legal route.

    Lacy Kemp, RealNetworks

  • Report this Comment On September 18, 2008, at 7:34 PM, jeremyhattingh wrote:

    The only way this thing is ever going to fly is if the network transport protocol includes packet value. In this way, data once again has a price and people can get paid. Digital content of itself has zero value, its volume unimportant. The myriad financial systems parasitically attached to this system were designed for industrial revolution opertion, not for the information age. We need a system designed from the ground up. I think with the current events maybe we will see the birth of this system.

  • Report this Comment On July 29, 2010, at 11:57 PM, binkenhiemer wrote:

    I personally think that ComCast's move is poor judgement. There are clear competitors. TWC thought about doing it and failed in Texas a few years ago. They tried to cap things by placing a bottleneck on speed, that failed, too. People want more speed, up and down, and no worries about caps. Otherwise, cable won't be the ISP of choice any more. I can get 7Mbs DSL in almost any Verizon or Frontier area right now. In fact, its what I use.

    One clear lesson in business is if you make headaches for your customers, it show in your bottom line.

  • Report this Comment On October 27, 2011, at 8:53 PM, polenium wrote:

    Comcast is a company you should never do business with unless you absolutely have no choice. (Is there such a situation?) They pad their bills, deliver crappy service and hoodwink community councils into giving virtual monopolies.

    I use Frontier's FIOS and so do most of the Microsoft employees who work from home. They are fast and extremely reliable. They don't try and rip you off.

    We should be exploring community options for providing vital services like internet connectivity rather than being cash cows for unscrupulous businesses who throw their weight around instead of than deliveromg the best product at the best price.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 724790, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 4:24:15 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
MSFT $29.06 Down -0.01 -0.03%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ****
NFLX $70.22 Down -0.05 -0.07%
Netflix CAPS Rating: **
RNWK $8.81 Up +0.19 +2.20%
RealNetworks, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
CMCSA $28.85 Down -0.08 -0.28%
Comcast Corp CAPS Rating: **
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
BLOKA.PK $0.19 Up +0.01 +0.00%
Blockbuster, Inc. CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement