With all-American car manufacturing giants General Motors (NYSE: GM ) and Ford (NYSE: F ) clinging to life, serious speculation has begun to circulate about whether either company will survive this economic mess. Could GM's recent acquisition target be the start of a new beginning of the ailing manufacturer?
Chrysler is currently owned primarily by private equity firm Cerberus Capital Management. Cereberus also owns a majority interest in GMAC, General Motors' former financing unit, which has been clobbered by its ill-fated move into mortgage banking.
Cerberus proposes swapping its 80.1% stake in Chrysler for GM's remaining 49% interest in GMAC. Cerberus has also reportedly been discussing a possible 19.9% acquisition of the remaining stake of Chrysler owned by Europe's Daimler (NYSE: DAI ) . Sounds like a solid deal, huh?
Not so fast. Wiping away GMAC could be smart, but GM could complicate its attempt at a turnaround by picking up another brand to juggle, especially given the current environment. Specific numbers and values are somewhat elusive in light of Chrysler's private-company status, but we do know that Chrysler was in the red to the tune of $1.6 billion for all of 2007. In the same time frame, GM's GMAC stake cost it roughly $1.1 billion.
Recent sales trends have skidded backward, too. In September, Chrysler's U.S. sales were down 30% year over year, while GM's fell 12.3%, thanks to a special sales incentive. Overall, auto sales dropped 26% during the month. Given the industry's steady plunge, pricing the U.S. operations of Chrysler for transfer to GM could be daunting.
Automakers' sad state has industry members scrambling to improve their financial and operating circumstances. Ford has received board approval to unload at least a portion of its 33.4% stake in Mazda (OTC BB: MSDAF), and it recently handed over its Land Rover and Jaguar units to Tata Motors (NYSE: TTM ) . And Toyota (NYSE: TM ) has completely idled a pair of former pickup truck plants while it retools to manufacture other models, including the Prius hybrid.
That said, I think GM and Chrysler would fare far better apart than together. Clearly, neither has made any real strides toward rolling out meaningful numbers of energy-efficient vehicles, and each is likely facing a withering and prolonged slide in sales and income.
As such, combining the two in the current atrophying automobile climate would be like tethering together a pair of non-swimmers for a go at the English Channel. The likelihood that each wouldn't drag down the other seems remote.
Further Foolishness shifts into gear: