Bring Down the Hammer on a Builders' Bailout

Recs

4

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

"Hey, Ben. Looks like another group just showed up, hard hats in hand, to get in line for our exciting fall bailout program. This thing's become a smashing success!"

The first sentences from a weekend call by Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson to his trusty sidekick, Ben Bernanke? Maybe, but if so, Paulson is only referring to the latest in a crazy campaign by all manner of downtrodden groups to have Uncle Sam hold their hands and stuff their wallets -- with your money.

This time, with the top dogs from General Motors (NYSE: GM), Ford (NYSE: F), and Chrysler having been escorted back aboard their Gulfstreams empty-handed, the nation's homebuilders have clambered into the federal soup line. They're taking out full-page newspaper ads pushing for a measly $250 billion to fund their "Fix Housing First" package.

Under their proposal, the government -- a.k.a. you and I -- would treat the still rapidly fading housing market by topically applying:

  • A tax credit for homebuyers equal to 10% of the value of the home. The credit would be capped at $22,000, about triple the $7,500 amount that Congress blessed earlier this year. Unlike the old credit, this builder-proposed credit wouldn't be repaid.
  • A subsidy on interest rates for conforming loans -- meaning that they meet standards for Fannie Mae (NYSE: FNM), Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE), and the Federal Housing Administration -- to bring mortgage rates to 3% from the current level near 6.2%. The National Association of Homebuilders estimates that this portion of its program would carry about a $143 billion price tag.

Fine, but I have a pair of questions here: First, when will the government spigot tighten? With pet food prices rising almost daily, aren't the loving owners of Floppsy and Phydeaux entitled to some government largess? Or, as a devout fan of football, I'm ringing up more and more of a tab just to attend the games. Shouldn't I be getting a ticket-price buydown, along perhaps with a little public sector transportation and parking vigorish?

Second -- and even more importantly -- isn't the proposal for a public-private mutual back-scratching just the sort of foolishness that got us into this now-global housing mess in the first place? As a former operative of one of the nation's major builders, I'm pulling for a cure for the likes of Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL) and Lennar (NYSE: LEN). But not if it results in a medical bill that perpetuates the problem and financially hammers you, me, and Phydeaux's folks.

For related Foolishness:

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Foolish contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned above. He does, however, welcome your questions, comments, or kibitzing. The Fool has an elegantly built disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2008, at 1:49 PM, optagonal wrote:

    Seems that we have spawned a welfare state for big industry - most countries use that kind of investment for the population - healthcare etc.

    I guess it shows where the priorities are in the world.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2008, at 2:36 PM, zagrebzagreb wrote:

    This is absolute madness...

    The over-extension of housing is one of the core perpetrators of the current economic meltdown, and now the industry is proposing we need MORE housing? Simply unbelievable. These guys have no shame and think we are fools (the bad kind, let it be said!)

    If ever an industry needed to rid itself of the dregs of bad business models and fast-buck artists, this is it.

    Should the feds subsidize this idiocy - even in part - we will have our answer as to the competency of our governmental leadership.

  • Report this Comment On November 25, 2008, at 3:09 PM, mikecoursey wrote:

    I can't believe it! In my area the market is COMPLETELY saturated with houses that aren't even moving.

    I suppose that they think putting this bandaid on the amputated arm of the housing market is going to make things better?

    If anything we need to cool it on residential building for a few years to let the market come back into balance.

    If they want help, why not help themselves to a strong balance sheet and sound business practices instead of this government panhandling.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 782853, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 1:42:04 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:01 PM
F $7.75 Up +0.30 +4.03%
Ford Motor Company CAPS Rating: **
FNM $1.04 Down -0.08 -7.14%
Fannie Mae CAPS Rating: *
FRE $1.23 Down -0.02 -1.60%
Freddie Mac CAPS Rating: *
GM $0.75 Down +0.00 +0.00%
General Motors Cor… CAPS Rating: *
LEN $14.14 Up +0.63 +4.66%
Lennar Corp CAPS Rating: *
TOL $18.14 Up +0.15 +0.83%
Toll Brothers, Inc… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Write-off: A write-off is a non-cash expense that reduces the value of an asset, usually inventory, on the balance sheet.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!