Is Netflix a Monopoly?

Recs

10

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

Ready for a laugh?

Yesterday's Los Angeles Times carried a story about a consumer lawsuit against Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX) and Wal-Mart (NYSE: WMT). The plaintiffs allege that the companies colluded to raise rental prices, as a result of Wal-Mart's decision to bow out of the DVD-subscription market in 2005.

I'm no legal eagle, but I can spot more holes in this litigation than some of M. Night Shyamalan's recent plotlines.

For starters, let's recall that Wal-Mart had roughly 100,000 members at the time. It was just a small player, unwilling to take on Netflix and Blockbuster (NYSE: BBI) in building out the network of DVD distribution centers necessary to provide overnight delivery through the postal system. Wal-Mart's hundred grand, however few of them may remain, is a sliver of the 8.7 million current subscribers that Netflix boasts today.

The plaintiffs accuse Netflix of raising its prices by $3 a month as a result of the Wal-Mart grab. Really? A year earlier, Netflix had slashed the monthly tab for its most popular plan -- one that allows unlimited rentals with no more than three titles out at a time -- by $4 to $17.99. The catalyst for the price cut is that it feared that Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN) was about to enter the market.  

In recent years, Blockbuster has gone from pricing its Total Access plan at price points lower and slightly higher than Netflix. Amazon remains a threat to throw its hat in the ring, but it has decided to focus its efforts on digital delivery, like Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) has.

Oh, and where exactly is the Netflix pricing strategy today? The same monthly plan that set film buffs back $21.99 in 2004 and $17.99 in 2005 is now just $16.99. Netflix has also gone on to include digital streaming at no additional cost. If the minor deal with Netflix is collusion to inflate prices, why are prices heading the other way?

Again, I'm no courtroom expert. Maybe there is some legal precedent behind the case. But everyone from Blockbuster to Netflix to the McDonald's (NYSE: MCD)-backed Redbox are lending out physical discs, and everyone from Apple to Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) is busy promoting broadband-delivered rentals. So, with the film-rental market more competitive now than ever before, doesn't this seem frivolous?

Did I say frivolous? I meant hilarious.   

Other headline relics:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Wal-Mart Stores and Microsoft are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Netflix, Amazon.com, and Apple are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz has been a Netflix shareholder -- and subscriber -- since 2002. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 08, 2009, at 3:28 PM, capsoregime wrote:

    Sure, it's a monopoly, along with its competitors offering the exact same services for nearly the same prices.

    Kinda thinking the plaintiffs are out of luck.

  • Report this Comment On January 10, 2009, at 5:36 AM, commentguy wrote:

    I hate being restricted by Netflix. I would rather way TV channels around the world and movies in 1080p Blu-ray on my PC and set top box on MyTVPAL ( www.mytvpal.com ) that's made using Matrixstream ( www.matrixstream.com ) IPTV platform.

    Michael Dunn

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 806352, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 6:01:13 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
MSFT $29.62 Down -0.16 -0.54%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
NFLX $59.97 Down -0.29 -0.48%
Netflix, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
MCD $63.97 Up +0.56 +0.88%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $199.92 Down -0.59 -0.29%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
BBI $0.74 Down -0.01 -1.33%
Blockbuster, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
AMZN $129.66 Up +0.67 +0.52%
Amazon.com, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
WMT $54.28 Down -0.26 -0.48%
Wal-Mart Stores, I… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Bond rating agency: A bond rating agency is a firm that specializes in rating debt instruments. The usual firms include Standard and Poor's, Moody's, and Fitch.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!