This Mistake Could Cost You a Fortune

Recs

45

Just when I thought it couldn't get any worse ... 2009 hit and proved me wrong yet again. And frankly, I just don't know how much longer I can take it.

It's not what you think!
You might be assuming that I'm talking about the Dow breaking right through its November lows, or the seemingly inevitable nationalization of Bank of America and Citigroup, which has sent  everything from Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) to JPMorgan (NYSE: JPM) spiraling ever lower -- but I'm actually talking about something much more painful for me personally...

You see, my grandfather played football for Oklahoma, and I've been a Sooners fan since I was old enough to walk. So it was nothing short of devastating to watch them lose their fifth straight BCS bowl game -- and their third straight national championship game -- to Saint Tim and team last month.

Of course, I'll always be a Sooner fan -- even though they're now the Buffalo Bills of college football. After all, in sports, sticking by your team through the ups and the downs is a virtue. Just ask any Green Bay Packers fan.

Wall Street, though, is a different ball game
For proof, just ask any "fan" of:

Stock

1-Year Return

AIG (NYSE: AIG)

(98%)

Cell Therapeutics (Nasdaq: CTIC)

(99%)

Charter Communications (Nasdaq: CHTR)

(97%)

MGM MIRAGE (NYSE: MGM)

(93%)

Data provided by Google Finance.

Or ask my fellow Fool Rich Greifner.

Or even ask Jim Cramer. In his book Real Money, he reminds investors, "This is not a sporting event; this is money. We have no room for rooting or hoping."

Yet it happens all the time. Investing message boards are full of desperate investors who hope some cash-rich behemoth will come along and save their decades-old American superbrand. But as Circuit City investors found out, this is often a losing bet -- especially in this credit-strapped market.

Others ride stocks all the way into the ground because they're emotionally attached to the company's story, products, or management – and meet with similarly dismal results.

Ditch that loser!
One of the "20 Rules for Investment Success" from Investor's Business Daily is to "cut every loss when it's 8% below your cost. Make no exceptions so you'll avoid any possible huge, damaging losses."

To a sports fan, that advice might seem cruel and unusual, but it's actually good investment advice.

Or is it? To find out, I dug through David and Tom Gardner's Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks, because they often re-recommend a stock even after a big run-up -- or a sharp fall. I actually found two examples where breaking IBD's rule actually paid off big time:

Stock Advisor Pick

Decline After Recommendation

Gain After Re-Recommendation

Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX)

23%

187%

Quality Systems

14%

681%

These weren't flukes, either
In his re-recommendation write-up for Netflix, David Gardner admitted, "We're currently sitting on a 23% loss." But he went on to say, "I think this is one cheap stock at $11, backed by a great management team that's going to create value for us going forward."

Note that he had well-thought-out reasons for owning the stock: "It remains first and best in a growing industry, creates convenience for millions of consumers, and is led by visionary management that markets aggressively." Netflix stock has risen 135% since then.

So when do you sell?
In today's dismal market climate, IBD's rule probably looks like pure genius -- and it probably could have saved you a lot of pain.

In the process, though, you might have had to sell every stock in your portfolio, and you may well have set yourself up to miss out on some truly massive gains when the market finally rebounds.

When it comes to knowing when to sell, investors have drastically different strategies. Many have hard-and-fast numerical rules -- which is at least part of the reason we've seen many excellent businesses losing 5% or even 10% per day since October.

Others -- like the Gardner brothers -- stick to a more analytical and intellectual approach to determine when to recommend their Stock Advisor subscribers sell a stock. So when do David and Tom Gardner consider dumping a stock? Primarily when they encounter:

  • Untrustworthy management.
  • Deteriorating financials.
  • Mergers, acquisitions, and spinoffs that could damage the business.

The debate rages on
Someone once said, "I have no problem knowing when to buy a stock, but if I just knew when to sell, I'd be a great investor."

Investors may never agree on when or why to sell a stock. That's why it's important to have an emotionless, well-thought-out strategy in place. If you don't, you may suffer major losses or miss out on massive gains.

That’s why I challenge you to use the comment function below to tell us what your strategy is and how it’s held up through this brutal bear market.

For what it's worth, David and Tom Gardner rarely sell, and it works for them. Even in this brutal bear market, their average Stock Advisor pick is performing 30 percentage points better than a like amount invested in the S&P 500.

If you'd like to see what David and Tom are recommending now -- including their top two picks for new money -- you can join them at Stock Advisor absolutely free for 30 days.

In addition to all of the stock picks and research, you'll also get full access to exclusive members-only discussion boards, where you can swap thoughts about when to buy or sell a stock with thousands of other dedicated investors.

To learn more about this free, no-obligation 30-day trial, simply click here.

This article was first published Dec. 28, 2007. It has been updated.

Austin Edwards does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. Netflix and Quality Systems are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Both The Motley Fool's disclosure policy and Sam Bradford will be around for at least another year.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 21, 2009, at 9:16 PM, lhowak wrote:

    The seemingly inevitable nationalization of Bank of America and Citigroup?

    You are behind on your news updates.

    White House says it supports private banking system

    5:00p ET February 20, 2009 (MarketWatch)

    WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) -- President Barack Obama's administration stands behind a "privately held" banking system, a spokesman said Friday, as shares of two of the biggest U.S. banks were slammed over fears they may be nationalized.

    "This administration continues to strongly believe that a privately held banking system is ... the correct way to go, ensuring that they are regulated sufficiently by this government," said White House press secretary Robert Gibbs.

    "That's been our belief for quite some time, and we continue to have that," he told reporters at the regular White House briefing.

    Gibbs took questions on Friday after Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said that banks may have to be nationalized for a short time.

    Bank of America Corp. shares hit a record low and Citigroup Inc..'s stock slumped to an 18-year low Friday, as the two financial giants faced investors' concerns that they may be nationalized. See full story.

    "I don't welcome that at all, but I could see how it's possible it may happen," Dodd said on Bloomberg Television's "Political Capital with Al Hunt," to be broadcast later Friday. "I'm concerned that we may end up having to do that, at least for a short time."

    Speculation about bank nationalization is making private investors wary of returning to the sector, despite the fact that most of the 8,400 lenders in the United States are well run and strongly capitalized, according to Edward Yingling, president of the American Bankers Association.

    "Investors will remain on the sidelines if there is continued speculation that the government may step in and undercut their investment," he said. "Nationalization, however defined, is not the solution to the problems in the financial markets."

  • Report this Comment On February 23, 2009, at 1:13 AM, dariusjedburg wrote:

    The point this article makes is dependent on what sort of trader/investor you are.

    If you are a day trader then selling losers quickly might make sense. But if you are an investor, you research companies and you only buy good, strong companies at good prices.

    Wells Fargo is probably one of the best run banks in the world. If it was a good buy at $15, it is a sensational buy at $10 - for a long term investor.

    My advice? Buy long in good companies and get a good nights sleep.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 836415, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 4:12:36 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Is Everybody Losing It in Finance's Nervous Breakdown?

Related Tickers

12/1/2009 3:31 PM
WFC $27.97 Down -0.07 -0.25%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ***
NFLX $58.23 Down -0.40 -0.68%
Netflix, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
CTIC $1.08 Up +0.05 +4.85%
Cell Therapeutics,… CAPS Rating: ***
CHTR $0.02 Down +0.00 +0.00%
CHARTER COMMUNICAT… CAPS Rating: **
AIG $30.95 Up +2.55 +8.98%
American Internati… CAPS Rating: **
JPM $42.17 Down -0.32 -0.75%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
MGM $11.12 Up +0.55 +5.20%
MGM Mirage CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Texas ratio: The Texas ratio is a ratio used to determine the extent of a bank's credit trouble.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!