AOL's Frightening Eviction

By Rick Aristotle Munarriz
May 29, 2009 | Comments (1)

Recs

9

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

There's a new Sam Raimi horror movie opening today, about a loan officer who evicts an elderly woman from her home and winds up with more than she bargained for when a damning curse is placed on her. Isn't the Drag Me to Hell plot pretty much what happened to Time Warner's (NYSE: TWX) AOL yesterday, only without the "I'm a Mac" guy in a supporting role?

After all, AOL is the aging tenant, being evicted by the number-crunching officers after it was unable to pay the rent. Either way, Time Warner's cursed.

Why did Time Warner take so long to finally unload AOL on its shareholders? AOL could have been worth so much more if Time Warner had only cut the cord earlier.

  • It could have spun out AOL seven years ago, when America Online peaked with 26.7 million access subscribers. For that matter, it could have probably sold its access business to EarthLink (Nasdaq: ELNK) or United Online (Nasdaq: UNTD) before the defections mounted.   
  • When Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) invested $1 billion to acquire a 5% stake in AOL four years ago, Time Warner could have cashed in on the implied $20 billion valuation.
  • Heck, Time Warner could have even set AOL free a year ago, when it was posting growth in operating profits, as high-margin online advertising gains were offsetting the subscriber defections.

The only upside to cutting AOL loose now is that it has Google ad exec Tim Armstrong at the helm. That gives AOL a little more street cred as the fallen dot-com darling begins the long road back to redemption.

Other than that, AOL is stuck in the same concrete block as Yahoo! (Nasdaq: YHOO). They're both pocketing a ton of properties that round up a boatload of traffic to hard-to-monetize pages. They're also both strong in display advertising, which is a poor man's paid search.

There is no easy fix. On its own, AOL may take a few more chances. It may absorb other traffic mongers, such as Ask.com parent IAC (Nasdaq: IACI) or domain-name collector Marchex (Nasdaq: MCHX). It's going to have to do something to attract new investors, since organic growth has also been sadly evicted.

Want to see something really scary, Raimi? Try an AOL "Welcome" screen on for size, and see how long it takes to work your way up to "Goodbye."

Other access stories to access:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers selection. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz wonders whether AOL will ever party like it's 1999.  He owns no shares in any of the companies in this story and is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy, and it's got mail.  

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 03, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Netteligent09 wrote:

    Investors has no interested in AOL. Friends dumping AOL. Customers walked away due to its pratice and poor service. There are no reason to stick around with AOL.

    Unless Tim Armstrong wants to start AOL as a small start up, it has a chance. It was a biggest failure on Google to invest in AOL and Time Warner.

    Time Warner and AOL management were the problem.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 909469, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 4:16:51 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

By The Motley Fool

An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
MCHX $4.65 Down -0.05 -1.06%
Marchex, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
YHOO $15.38 Down -0.23 -1.47%
Yahoo!, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
UNTD $7.27 Up +0.24 +3.41%
United Online, Inc… CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $569.96 Down -3.03 -0.53%
Google, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
TWX $31.64 Down -0.66 -2.04%
Time Warner, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
ELNK $8.47 Up +0.12 +1.44%
EarthLink, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
IACI $19.41 Down -0.20 -1.02%
IAC/InterActiveCor… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Poop and scoop: Poop and scoop is a form of illegal stock manipulation, where a scammer tries to drive down the price of stock through publishing and distributing unsolicited misleading advertising materials so that the scammer can buy the stock at a lower price.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!