Rocket Stock or Dud?

Recs

8

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Stock Advisor

"The bigger they are, the harder they fall." It's the worst nightmare of every investor in today's market -- buying a rocket stock just before it takes a nosedive.

Now I readily admit that sometimes, stocks rise for a reason. But sometimes, the rise becomes the reason. No matter how often we caution them not to, investors do have a habit of buying "hot" stocks, and trusting momentum to keep 'em moving upwards.

Problem is, if the price goes up too much, even a great company can turn into a lousy investment. Below, I list a few stocks that may have done just that -- stocks that have more than doubled since the beginning of this year, and just might be ripe to fall back to earth.

Stock

Recent Price

CAPS Rating
(out of 5)

Targa Resources Partners  (Nasdaq: NGLS)

$14.41

*****

Trina Solar  (NYSE: TSL)

$26.46

**

Rite Aid  (NYSE: RAD)

$1.35

**

Sirius XM Radio  (Nasdaq: SIRI)

$0.45

**

Interoil (NYSE: IOC)

$29.67

*

Companies are selected by screening for 100% and higher price appreciation year-to-date on finviz.com. Current pricing provided by Yahoo! Finance. CAPS ratings from Motley Fool CAPS.

Each of these stocks has enjoyed remarkable gains over the past six months. But if you ask the 135,000 (and counting) investors who make up Motley Fool CAPS, most of them have come too far, too fast.

That worry may be well-founded for some of these firms. Fools worry that an impending price hike might scare off customers at Sirius. Rite Aid just dodged the bullet on a potential reverse share split -- only to find its stock rocked by anemic June comps. And although Trina Solar survived last week's LDK Solar (NYSE: LDK) scare-off fairly well, tumbling silicon prices have prospects looking increasingly cloudy for solar plays such as First Solar (Nasdaq: FSLR). Perhaps Trina's due for a tumble of its own?

Whatever the fate of these firms, there's one stock on today's list that's giving Fools few misgivings:

Targa Resources Partners
Why buy an LNG play in the middle of a lousy market for natural gas? paulshoe argues, "Natural Gas is at a bargain price that won't last. Even in a slowing economy; you have to heat your house. Dividend Yield, book value, P/E, growth potential, solid management are all screaming buy ME (NGLS)."

But it's the dividend yield yelling loudest of all. bothisellhigher loves Targa's "Dividend of 2.05" and points out that if this seems high to you, Targa has been "steadily increasing quarterly dividends since 5/15/07."

Can NGLS maintain that dividend? CAPS All-Star rdpatton thinks so. Writing in February, rdpatton argued that Targa is "Reasonably well hedged," and that "distribution looks secure for 2009 with low risk of debt covenant violations."

Me, I'm not so sure. I mean, Targa's dividend yield of 14% sure looks attractive, but I've my doubts as to how long a company can continue to pay out $2.05 a share when it's only earning $1.24 -- and when those earnings are expected to decline this year, and fall nearly 50% short of the dividend's requirement next year.

To me, Targa's situation would look pretty tenuous even if it were not carrying a debt load equal to its own market cap. (And it is.)

Time to chime in
That said, Targa's price doesn't look all that high -- the P/E is just shy of 12. Furthermore, analysts expect to see strong double-digit growth next year, trailing off to a long-term growth rate of about 8%. Seems to me that while Targa may not be able to sustain its current dividend, it could cut the divvy substantially (say, by half), conserve some cash while maintaining a respectable 7% yield, and still work out as a reasonably profitable investment.

But that's just my opinion. If you agree with rdpatton that Targa's dividend is secure, here's a chance to argue the point. Click on over to Motley Fool CAPS and tell us what you think. Or alternatively, maybe you think the dividend is toast, and the stock too? CAPS is the place to make that argument as well. Either way, fire away!

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above. You can find him on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 818 out of more than 135,000 members. First Solar is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 10:51 AM, JPS007 wrote:

    Right on Queue. Everytime Sirius has some good new to announce, MF comes out with a negative news to keep the stock price low and to keep their interests intact.

    Nothing but a self serving unobjective article. Nothing but subjective throw up.

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 10:52 AM, kencooksam wrote:

    Another shameful article by Motley Fool. Please do some DD before writing your articles. Yes IOC is down lately but still up 100% Year To Date. Why is it down?? Is not that the relevant question..??The reason IOC is down is because they did a bond conversion for 3 million shares. Further cleaned up the balance sheet.Those bond holders no longer were goingto receive their 8% coupon and they had a $10 gain on their debentures. So they have been selling. Their conversion price was $25 and the stock was well above $35. That becomes free money and they lost their divi in the conversion so many sold. Driving the stock down, IOC has a very important CC tomorrow Tueday and it should have some short term and long tem reasons why IOC"s stock price is way undervalued..Any type of DD would reveal these simole facts. The author should be embarrased for such sloppy homework...This is why Motleu Fool is struggling right now...Failure to do DD.Killing ya guys..

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 11:10 AM, JRSmithman wrote:

    this report was from 3 months ago same title and everything. need to write something new like the Sirius Iphone App is the most downloaded application with over a million downloads from the last 2 weeks. or how the stock is about to get a raise in rating which will happen very shortly.

    So let recap (I will play the writer for for this report. Yes this stock is a rocket and it is going to keep rising. We are no longer in BK territory and the auto field is getting back on its feet again the company knows how to save money and balance the budget as what we have seen. Advertising is popping up all over the place. the IPhone Apps is the most largest download from the Apple store. With the Qt 2 reports coming out I believe this stock has a chance to shine>"

    How was that MF let me be your editor I will give you some editing tips to make a report worth reading

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 11:14 AM, JRSmithman wrote:

    I can see no one is ever serious about the stock rating here as well or no one has taken the time to update this, no new news for this which still has the same star rating it had 6 months ago. At least Standard & Poor give this a 3 star rating.

    Stop being lazy and update your site MF

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 11:32 AM, jrbatista wrote:

    SIRI has been unratable in CAPS for a year now, which is why the rating hasn't/can't change - but why does the Fool continue to reference a woefully out-of-date rating, that only reflects how members felt about SIRI a year ago?

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 11:47 AM, timd209 wrote:

    MF has been wrong about SIRI every step of the way, they were writing articles with titles like "sell this junk stock now" when SIRI was 10 cents a share.

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 11:51 AM, JPS007 wrote:

    Someone should write a news feed article on how unobjective MF is, and that their garbage should be read as comedic content and a good laugh in the morning. I always know when to read MF. There is always a negatvie article whenever good news was recently posted.

    I like the acronym MF. In my mind is stands for something else though.

    These articles are good for a good laugh in the morning!

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 12:04 PM, SuccessusRoss wrote:

    Things will change with an SEC investigation.

    Fool's days are numbered.

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 12:31 PM, JimboUSMC17 wrote:

    Your article sucks Richie boy. Don't be mad because you missed the boat on SIRI...thank you, come again!!

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 12:58 PM, doogie1234 wrote:

    Wow - what a complete dumba**.

    SIRI is up so much that it is due for a fall? Ever watch the News? Quick - tell me the most recent three significant developments at SIRI. I'm sure you have no idea.

    You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about and should be fired immediately for this unprofessional article.

  • Report this Comment On July 06, 2009, at 2:52 PM, DiscoFinance wrote:

    There is a DVD movie out about the whole Sirius XM/Mel K. story called: Stock Shock.

    Very good flick and explains stock market manipulation as well. Stock Shock is at amazon.com and stockshockmovie.com

  • Report this Comment On July 07, 2009, at 8:54 AM, BullishBroker74 wrote:

    By Brandon Matthews

    Traditional forms of media including television, radio and print are threatened by the success of Sirius XM Radio (SIRI). There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the organizations behind traditional forms of media have united on a single front to denigrate the Satellite Radio provider at any and all costs. I know this first hand as most of the negative comments left on Satwaves.com can be traced back to everything from terrestrial radio station operators to the National Association of Broadcasters. These traditional media conglomerates control everything most people see and hear. Consider if you will the number 1 hit by the Black Eyed Peas in which the words “Satellite Radio” have been bleeped out by terrestrial radio stations from coast to coast.

    In the years since Howard Stern first joined Sirius, traditional media has made a point of downplaying Howard Stern's relevance. Just last October, the Los Angeles Times published this article which made the claim that Howard Stern was no longer relevant, and that his listeners had dwindled to a fraction of the number that once tuned in. The Los Angeles Times happens to be owned by Tribune; “America’s largest employee-owned media company, operating businesses in publishing, interactive and broadcasting.” The same article was syndicated and republished on an almost daily basis for several weeks that followed, assuring that the story would be told in every major U.S. market and maintain a top ranked listing in google news search results.

    That is why I could not help but laugh hysterically at the newest media attempts to control the American public’s view of Sirius XM Radio through new articles that claim Howard Stern will leave Sirius XM nearly two years from now. These articles now make the claim that Howard Stern is so important and popular, that Sirius XM’s survival hinges on whether or not Howard decides to stay with Sirius XM when his contract comes up for renewal in 2011! Unfortunately, some people seem to be buying into this manipulation and fear-mongering. The reach of these media outlets is unlimited in scope.

    As an example, on the eve of Sirius XM’s announcement that its iPhone application had reached a million downloads, a story was written suggesting that Sirius XM stock would be a good short sale candidate by a known writer who has denigrated Sirius for years. I recall writing that it seemed like a signal was being sent on the Satwaves forums the moment I read it. As trading progressed the following day it looked as if Sirius XM stock would rise precipitously on the iPhone application news. CNBC even picked up the story, but if you follow Sirius XM you knew what was coming next.

    It was then reported that the app, despite having over a million downloads, had a low rating based on the absence of The Howard Stern Show. The very same show that the media has been proclaiming to be irrelevant. The stock ended the day's session flat as a result. Out of nearly 19 million subscribers and out of 1 million iPhone app downloads, the app was given a low rating by a mere 38,000 people. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that anyone can bash the application, whether or not they even own an Apple device. I rated the application 5 stars, and I have no iPod nor iPhone. I simply signed up using my AOL account. It can hardly be deemed a reliable source of consumer sentiment compared to the fact that it remains the number 1 downloaded music application.

    As for Howard Stern, terrestrial radio is already on life support. Clear Channel is knocking on bankruptcy’s door. When it comes to radio companies, there is only one that is growing. There is only one that can offer Howard the freedom to do his show and produce new shows without fear of retribution from the FCC. By the year 2011, it is probable that no radio company in existence would be able to afford Howard Stern while offering him a minuscule percentage of his current national audience. Only one radio company can offer The Howard Stern Show a potential global audience in the years to come. That radio company is Sirius XM Radio.

    As for the media manipulation: People should make a stand. If you’d like to be told what to read and hear only that which is selected for you, you might want to consider a move to North Korea. Turn off your am/fm radios. Pick up a Satellite Radio and subscription. Send a message to traditional media that they cannot control what you see and what you hear. I have and in this lies true freedom.

    Position: Long SIRI

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2009, at 8:59 AM, kencooksam wrote:

    Heres real DD on IOC. I must say Motley Fool appears to be overtaken with short Hedge Fund ideas. Was it the strip club visit that got ya Motley Fool or the lunch. Clearly Motley Fool has a negative format.One has to why???

    Platts IOC to name partners SOON!! Interview CEO Mulacek

    Tokyo (Platts)--9Jul2009

    The InterOil-led Papua New Guinea LNG project is about to narrow down the

    field to "a few" potential partners to take a stake of 25-35% in the

    development, with an eye to making a decision by the end of this year, the

    Canada-based company's chairman and CEO Phil Mulacek said in an interview this

    week.

    "We [gave] access to 30 companies interested [in the project]," Mulacek

    said. "We are now trimming [them] down to a few groups," he said of the

    ongoing qualification round.

    InterOil plans to invite new partners to take a 25-35% share of

    developing the Antelope gas structure, liquefaction and offtake. "We are

    working in the qualification through partners to join our project first, and

    then [the] next stage is the LNG offtake," Mulacek said.

    The interested companies included "a couple of Japanese consortiums," and

    also came from China, Europe and the US, Mulacek said, declining to identify

    any of the parties. He was scheduled to meet a number of Japanese companies in

    Tokyo over July 7-8.

    Mulacek would not detail definitive time frames for concluding the

    qualification round, but said "it is in everyone's interest to get

    negotiations to define [it] as quickly as possible." Speaking to Platts in

    Tokyo in May, Mulacek had said InterOil was planning to make a decision on new

    partners "over the next two to three months."

    InterOil is also drilling the Antelope-2 well over the next 90 days to

    define oil and heavy condensate as part of serialized efforts to certify

    reserves, Mulacek said. The LNG project is based on reserves in the Elk and

    Antelope gas fields.

    "We have certified between 3.4 and 4.7 Tcf of gas as of December 31,

    [2008]" he said. "All the parties have upgraded that to 6.1-7.3 Tcf [in their

    interim reports]. The utilities want 2 to 4 Tcf, so we clearly have more than

    enough gas requirement for the first [LNG] train," Mulacek added.

    The project's first LNG production train would have a capacity of 3.5

    million mt/year and a nominal throughput of 4 million mt/year.

    "They [potential buyers] can now price the gas, but what we cannot yet

    define is the question whether there is 100 million barrels of condensate or

    oil or is there 500 million barrels? We do not know yet but we know it is

    going to be a very significant amount," he added. InterOil's current estimate

    for the field's oil reserve is 100 million barrels.

    "All we can do [now] is work with the Japanese consortium to work out a

    pricing structure," Mulacek said. "As the liquids and oil are finally defined

    then we can proceed with closing. This is the mechanism we are focused on," he

    added.

    "We have had expression [of interest] for 100% of the offtake so we are

    very comfortable," Mulacek added. "In an agreement we design for two trains,

    but we are looking at this one after another."

    InterOil and its project partners PNG's national petroleum and mining

    company Petromin PNG and Pacific LNG, an investment arm of Switzerland's

    Clarion Finanz, now plan to make a final investment decision on an oil and

    condensate development at Antelope this year. Oil and condensate output from

    the project would start up in 2010 and 2011 respectively, Mulacek said.

    The final investment decision for the LNG project is targeted for 2010,

    with production planned to start in 2014.

    Separately, Petromin is seeking an offtake-for-debt agreement with Japan

    to fund its purchase of equity in the LNG project, Mulacek said, declining to

    elaborate. The company is seeking up to $500 million in financing from Japan

    and in turn would offer 20%, or at least 800,000 mt/year, of the project's LNG

    offtake under a 10-year agreement.

    Petromin is also in talks with state-owned Japan Bank for International

    Cooperation and Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation on the

    providing of financial support for PNG's upstream-to-downstream LNG chain.

    --Takeo Kumagai, takeo_kumagai@platts.com

  • Report this Comment On July 10, 2009, at 11:01 PM, Golbguru wrote:

    Rich, it is extremely misleading to talk about MLPs like NGLS (Targa Resources) without even mentioning "distributable cash flow" and "coverage ratio".

    2009 Q1 distribution was $0.52 per common unit (share). For 47.16 million shares, that's a total distribution of $24.5 million.

    2009 Q1 distributable cash flow was $33.6 million. Gives a coverage ratio of little over 1.3. Most MLPs are in this range - and it is not bad at all.

    Plus it is well within the limits set in its debt covenant (please see the balance sheet).

    In summary, your statement "Seems to me that while Targa may not be able to sustain its current dividend, it could cut the divvy substantially", is essentially baseless.

    Moreover, you need to do more homework on MLPs and stop calling distributions as "dividends".

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 934554, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/8/2009 12:21:29 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Which Companies Can Buy It Like Buffett?

Related Tickers

11/6/2009 4:00 PM
LDK $5.74 Down -0.06 -1.03%
LDK Solar Co., Ltd… CAPS Rating: ***
RAD $1.35 Up +0.03 +2.27%
Rite Aid Corp CAPS Rating: **
TSL $38.15 Down -0.60 -1.55%
Trina Solar Limite… CAPS Rating: **
FSLR $117.93 Down -2.83 -2.34%
First Solar, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
NGLS $19.75 Up +0.38 +1.96%
Targa Resources Pa… CAPS Rating: ****
SIRI $0.63 Down +0.00 -0.63%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Hedge fund: A hedge fund is a private investment partnership, usually reserved for wealthy investors and entities.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!