Recs

8

When Will a Sensible Energy Plan Arrive?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Monday's Wall Street Journal included an op-ed piece entitled "New Priorities For Our Energy Future" by T. Boone Pickens and Ted Turner. The unlikely duo emphasized the increased need for renewable energy and "clean-burning natural gas" for a more secure energy and climatic future.

That's nothing we haven't heard before, and fortunately, we're hardly sitting still on either count. As I noted a month ago, even ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) , is now following hard on the heels of BP (NYSE: BP  ) , Shell (NYSE: RDS-A  ) , and others in a new biofuels project focusing on algae. Beyond that, producers as Chesapeake (NYSE: CHK  ) and Devon (NYSE: DVN  ) have left us awash in natural gas.

However, the authors did make some solid points worth remembering. Pickens and Turner noted that we spent nearly $25 billion in June alone to import foreign crude oil for domestic use. They also mentioned that burning natural gas creates only half the carbon dioxide produced by coal.

Still, the items they left out of the piece seemed to make it incomplete:

  • I was pleased at Pickens and Turner's emphasis on natural gas -- but where was the word "nuclear"? Atomic energy has been successful for France; shouldn't we also take advantage of its proven technology?
  • Pickens and Turner also overlooked the possibility of opening the majority of our outer continental shelf to drilling. We need interim sources of fuel, and increased domestic drilling is one way to provide hydrocarbons without sending money abroad.

Nevertheless, most members of Big Oil are now involved in the renewable fuels effort, joined by such other companies as Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW  ) and DuPont (NYSE: DD  ) . I therefore would like to believe that we'll soon be farther along than we could have predicted in this important endeavor.

Finally, I've mentioned some solid companies above; both Dow Chemical and ExxonMobil are four-star rated by Motley Fool CAPS players, while Chesapeake earned a coveted fifth star. Why not weigh in with your votes on each company?

For related energy foolishness:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor David Lee Smith doesn't own a single share of any of the companies listed above. He does welcome your questions about any aspect of energy policy. Chesapeake Energy is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection. The Fool owns shares of Chesapeake Energy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 18, 2009, at 5:34 PM, IQ168 wrote:

    "... spent nearly $25 billion in June alone to import foreign crude oil ..." I am really sick of hearing about being "dependent on foreign oil" and the amount imported (above comment). The US has more oil under it's territory than the whole middle east (no one knows the extent of Russia's holding). But, certainly enough oil to last for another 200 years. The problem is having our brain dead "guvnmt" permit the drilling and extraction of all of those reserves. There is no need to be dependent on any foreign country. Natural Gas is a bomb waiting to explode; ethanol cannot be transported and is hghly volatile; batteries are inefficient and there is no plan for disposal - as is true of nuclear waste; wind is unreliable ... OIL is available, has none of above strictures, and OIL IS A RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE. There are trillions of little molecules breaking down under our feet. Write your brain dead congresspersons.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 4:50 PM, driller101 wrote:

    Nope, not even close. IQ must be thinking of shale oil, which so far is not a viable source. Furthermore more or less drilling offshore or in Alaska won't make much difference. Believe me, if there were easy oil at $70/bbl, the oil companies would be all over it in the places they ARE allowed to drill. There are less than 10 jack ups drilling the the Gulf of Mexico shallow waters right now. This is strictly due to the low price of natural gas, whice is about all you can find there.

    What is really needed is a floor on the price of gasoline at the pump. If gas cost $5.00/gal, it would hasten the switch to using natural gas for fuel, it would automatically increase the sale of fuel efficient vehicles. The federal taxes (to bring the price up to $5.00) would reduce the deficit and eliminate the need for cap and trade, etc.

  • Report this Comment On August 19, 2009, at 5:12 PM, dgmennie wrote:

    Let's see. T. Boone Pickens and Ted Turner are highly-trained physicists and/or engineers who have spent a lifetime researching alternative energy sources.

    No? They are opportunistic investors and media personalities famous for being well-known and quoted at length by every media flunkie on the way up or on the way down who needs a limelight fix!

    And you really wonder why US energy policy makes no sense, provides no solutions, and continues to enrich our worst enemies?

    Hype and horsefeathers are everywhere, and its only getting worse.

  • Report this Comment On August 21, 2009, at 2:35 PM, rfaramir wrote:

    The problem is that we have a government policy on energy! If the US would axe the DOE and repeal every regulation getting in the way of drilling and refining (especially environmentalist wacko obstructionists), we'd be awash in what we need.

    The energy companies ARE prepared to supply what we need. They aren't ALLOWED to!

    We'd get as many nuclear plants as our electricity use needed, as much oil drilled as our cars want, and we'd stop funding the countries where terrorists are breeding. And we'd do it with less burden on taxpayers than any energy plan the politicians can conceivably come up with.

  • Report this Comment On August 21, 2009, at 2:50 PM, catoismymotor wrote:

    Imagine the power that could be tapped if we could just plug into Alstry. He is on 24/7. He never sleeps. His fingers are fierce and his mind is...well...certainly active. I heard he goes through keyboards and coffee at an alarming rate. He is like the verbose version of The Stig. We need to ask him if he walks around the house in a white flame retardant racing suit with matching helmet.\

    Anyway, back on the real subject. I found this story about a new type of battery that might be able to solve some power issues. ---> http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/ViewPost.aspx?bpid=244233&t=0...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 966587, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/9/2012 5:49:13 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:01 PM
DVN $66.23 Down -0.03 -0.05%
Devon Energy Corp CAPS Rating: *****
RDS-A $72.78 Up +0.24 +0.33%
Royal Dutch Shell… CAPS Rating: ****
XOM $84.88 Down -0.44 -0.52%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
DOW $34.42 Up +0.47 +1.38%
The Dow Chemical C… CAPS Rating: ****
BP $46.77 Down -0.20 -0.43%
BP p.l.c. (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
CHK $22.34 Up +0.23 +1.04%
Chesapeake Energy… CAPS Rating: *****
DD $52.06 Up +0.41 +0.79%
E.I. du Pont de Ne… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement