A Conversation With T. Boone Pickens

Recs

91

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

It's no secret that America is at an energy crossroads. Energy prices are only expected to increase, and relying on foreign oil could pose a national security threat. Renewable energy seems like a possible alternative, especially with government incentives -- yet capital markets aren't permitting it right now.

To gain some perspective on the multitude of issues that plague the energy space, I spoke with T. Boone Pickens, oil tycoon, champion of the Pickens Plan, and chairman of hedge fund BP Capital.

Pickens says he's moving forward with the Pickens Plan, despite having to postpone his wind farm project because of clamped capital markets and difficulties surrounding transmission of energy generation. Aside from the plan, the billionaire says the Commodities Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) potential regulation to limit trading in the oil futures markets doesn't faze him. Pickens says he thinks oil is going to $75 a barrel by year-end -- and higher in the longer term.

We also discussed Pickens' favorite energy companies to invest in. After crashing in 2008, Pickens -- who has a 20% stake in his hedge fund -- has seen his fund's energy futures fund rise 79% this year, while his energy equity fund is up 14%.

What follows is an edited transcript:

Jennifer Schonberger: What is your outlook for renewable energy as a whole, and do you still believe in wind energy as the future energy source for America?

T. Boone Pickens: Yes. You're going to start to use our resources in this country and quit depending on somebody else's oil. Now, wind and solar are not going to replace crude oil, because oil is used primarily for diesel and gas transportation fuel. So we need to get on our own resources, and I think that is starting to happen. I think this administration is committed to it, and they're going to see that it does happen.

Schonberger: What about the fact that the recession has caused energy prices to fall, which in turn has made expensive renewable sources such as wind and solar non-competitive in terms of cost -- an important consideration at a time when consumers are trying to save on energy bills. How does that bode for the future of renewables?

Pickens: On the renewables, no question, demand often makes a difference, but that's just a temporary situation. By the time they get the legislation passed, I'm confident that the price of fuel will be back up again. ... I think that the renewables are going to be used, and once we get started, we'll find out that we can do it cheaper than when we start out.

Schonberger: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid introduced the Natural Gas Act into the Senate (incentives for natural-gas-fueled cars). Do you think the bill will pass?

Pickens: Look at what happened two weeks ago on H.R. 1622. It was a nonpartisan natural gas bill that offers $30 million in funding per year for research on natural gas vehicles. It went right through. Now, no question it was a small bill, but it gives you a pretty good indication of how our Congress is looking at anything related to natural gas. Yes, I think that 1835, the Natural Gas Act, will pass. When you look at the co-sponsors on the bill, they have 100 co-sponsors and they're split 50-50 Democrats and Republicans. The companion bill in the Senate is 1408, and those two bills are very compatible and will help [the legislation] come together real fast. So yes, I think the Natural Gas Act is going to pass in October.

Schonberger: With regard to natural-gas-fueled cars, how long will it take to set up the infrastructure and what is the cost to replace the gasoline fueled internal combustion engine?

Pickens: I see it as a seamless event. The way it works is you cut out diesel for the purchase of new 18-wheelers. Set it up where you use domestic fuel on the 18-wheelers and cut out the diesel. That's good for the environmentalists because natural gas, for instance, is 50% cleaner than diesel. It's cheaper, it's ours, and it's abundant. So start with the 18-wheelers and the infrastructure will come as fast as the vehicles show up. The government doesn't have to set up the infrastructure. That can be done by private industry. ...

Don't worry about costly. Private industry will expect to make a profit off it and if they do, they'll pay taxes, which will help the economy by creating jobs. 350,000 18-wheelers will get you 420,000 jobs. The only place [government would] need to help is to incentivize the 18-wheeler owner because you have an incremental difference in the cost of a natural gas truck and a diesel truck, but you can make up for it on the cost of fuel.

Schonberger: The CFTC has suggested speculators have been a strong force in driving volatile swings in oil prices. As a result, the agency is widely expected to adopt new rules that would limit the amount of investments in commodities by big institutions that are only in it for financial gains as opposed to taking delivery of the commodity. As someone whose energy futures fund is up 79% this year, where do you stand on this issue?

Pickens: They can do whatever they want to. Whatever rules they set up, we'll play under those rules. Throw the ball up in the air, tell me what kind of game it is, and we'll play that game.

Schonberger: Should this regulation pass, what are the implications for the stocks of energy companies that have profited from such a surge in oil prices (driven by speculators or not)? Would the passage compromise profits for these companies?

Pickens: I don't believe speculation drives up the physical market. So too high for the price of oil are the people that have the oil, and so when the Saudis tell me it's going to be $75 oil, I believe them. That's what they're going to have. It doesn't have anything to do with the Nymex.

Schonberger: Where do you see the price of crude oil going by the end of the year? What about 2010 and long-term?

Pickens: I see oil at $75 by the end of the year, and in 2010 and longer term, it will be higher.

Schonberger: Oil is obviously a commodity. To that end, do you think we are in a secular commodities bull market?

Pickens: Well, in oil you're dealing with a supply of 85 million barrels a day globally, and that's all you're going to get. Jump out to December 2010 on the commodity market, and it shows $75/$77 [a barrel] right now. For December 2011 it's $80. I would imagine that market, that distance out there looking at the commodity I think that's probably fairly accurate.

Schonberger: In terms of hot spots you and your funds are investing in within the energy space, what areas do you favor most right now? E&P, oil services/natural gas, refiners?

Pickens: We're in the E&P companies. I've said before that I think the two best on oil are Suncor Energy (NYSE: SU) and Continental Resources (NYSE: CLR). Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN), Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK), SandRidge Energy (NYSE: SD), and Range Resources (NYSE: RRC), are also well-run companies, and they'll do well when natural gas recovers. We [also] like their reserve bases.

Schonberger: Does your hedge fund have plans to roll out a renewable energy fund?

Pickens: No.

Schonberger: Could you update me on the status of your plan?

Pickens: We're not going to have transmission available to us until 2013. We start to receive turbines in the first quarter of 2011, so we're going to have to find another place to use them then where we thought we were going to, so it's not anything more than you experience in other deals. You have to make adjustments from time to time. We'll make an adjustment, use the turbines in 2011 someplace else and use turbines in 2013 back on the Pampa Project ...

So I think the Pickens Plan is right on course. We're further down the track. We haven't lost any of the components that we talked about from the outset in July 2008, everything is still alive and it's moving forward. I think you're going to have legislation from Congress this year that will dictate the direction of energy for the next 50 years for the United States. It will be monumental if it comes off like I think it will.

For Related Foolishness:

Start investing today -- just $7 per trade with Scottrade. Or find the broker that's right for you.

Love this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Jennifer Schonberger owns no shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. Chesapeake Energy is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick, and The Fool owns shares of it. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Melaschasm wrote:

    While I disagree with Pickens about solar and wind, he appears to be right about using CNG (compressed natural gas) to power automobiles.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 10:40 AM, plange01 wrote:

    pickens got stuck with hundreds of millions worth of windmills and no way to bring power to them.his main objective now is bailing himself out by using his own wind...

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 12:01 PM, beatnik11 wrote:

    I think Pickens is quite an intelligent and far sighted man, indeed much more far sighted than many speculators that play the market. The credit crunch certainly didnt help things, but sometimes stuff happens and you just have to deal with it and modify the plan. All and all I definitely think he is going in the right direct and certainly speaks sense

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 12:03 PM, nocemployee wrote:

    I think he was stuck with no way to bring power FROM them. You see, how this works is they (windmills) turn based on the force generated by wind and consequently produce power. This power then needs to be routed to the network, not from it;) I do agree however. This was a failed business venture. He, like everybody else is trying to get on the bandwagon and didn't even know the technology that he was getting into. I believe he is also involved in natural gas as an auto alternative, maybe he should stick with hydrocarbons.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 12:08 PM, whereaminow wrote:

    Pandering for subsidies is such a lucrative business.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:22 PM, 11787HOT wrote:

    REMEMBER THE LIST OF PEOPLE WHO HAD HINDSITE, , BUT WERE LAUGHED AT BY "FOOLS". HE IS A VERY RICH MAN. HE AINT NO FOOL.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:27 PM, bretco wrote:

    Was Mr Pickens a Texas english teacher before becoming an oilman? Might he have taught the Bush brothers how to speak ?

    Blunderbluss if ever there was one.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:33 PM, motoruse wrote:

    Pickens is claiming changing out 18 wheeler rigs. My point is, any existing diesel, gasoline engine can be converted to use CNG. The change over is much cheaper than new Rigs with CNG engine's. Additionally, a diesel engine converted to CNG will last longer than under diesel fuel. Why run up the cost to the Owner Operators and Transportation companies! It only runs up the cost to the consumer!

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:48 PM, docjoctoo wrote:

    Pickens has reached that stage in life that only age brings, where he pretty much tells you what he thinks, right or wrong. He is not in it for money. He is in it to get America off imported oil . Right now we are helping finance our enemies.Using as much natural gas as we can is the starting point. Later as the market will dictate other energy souces.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:49 PM, MoHawke wrote:

    I agree totally with the Pickens Plan. However, speaking as a retired power company engineer, his company failed due diligence on the electrical transmission infrastructure available in the planned wind-farm areas. It takes years to plan, design, obtain right-of-way and build transmission lines of the type needed for these projects. Right-of-way, if needed, is usually the hold back.

    The FedEx Pacific hub complex in Oakland California is a great example of the technology we should concentrate on in the near future. This building is completely solar powered by rooftop mounted photovoltaic arrays. See article at following link.

    http://www.pv-tech.org/news/_a/bp_solar_to_install_operate_2...

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:52 PM, paultaut wrote:

    stop Yelling. You can get your point across without Capitalizing all of your words.

    TBoone has been part of the problem from the start. His futuristic calls on the price of oil gave speculators impetus to drive the prices up.

    He finally gave an outrageous call in 2008 for $200 oil which was picked by Goldman and Morgan Stanley which gave Hedge funds the go ahead to take delivery of oil as oil futures contracts expired.

    This worked well until a Hedge Fund tried to sell when it needed cash. That's when the $5-10 gyrations started.

    Throughout the first half of of 2008, as TBoone was pushing Nat. Gas, his Oil Holdings kept rising in value. His Fund was reamed with everyone else. His prediction Failed.

    But He and his Family managed to unload over 3 Million shares of CLNE Near its Top in 2008.

    He has spent over 18 months trying to get Public funding for those Transmission connections to the Electrical Grid. That's what the Ads were all about, IMO, a really cheap way to get Billions in aid.

    No doubt about it, "He ain't no fool."

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 5:57 PM, paultaut wrote:

    This is a Free site for anyone interested in Insider Trades: the Subscription is free, you get Insider transactions on up to 25 stocks mailed to you.

    Usually faster than they show from other sources.

    J3SG.com.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 6:03 PM, peters46 wrote:

    I think he is definitely correct that crude oil will not be replaced anytime soon, because it is used for so much more than just energy - fertilizer, plastics, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, etc. But he does disappoint me in one way. Approximately six years ago there was an article in Discover magazine about a professor who had developed a method of making oil from any organic. A multimillion (15?) dollar test plant was constructed and shown to work. Break-even point on cost was oil at $45/barrel. This process could be used for any organic, including the plastic in old computers and rubber from old tires. What comes out is clean oil, metals, glass and ash. Actually, I am more disappointed in the professor than in Pickens. I have not found any way to invest in his process. But the disappointment is more about the landfills being filled, the mountains of old tires (waiting to burn), and all the hazardous ewaste. Last I heard on that was that he built a plant to process rendering waste from chickens or turkeys.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 7:41 PM, RCS2rocks wrote:

    Why is Pickens so afraid to criticize the politicians?

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 8:57 PM, mtracy9 wrote:

    This Texas hick was behind the "Swiftboating" of candidate John Kerry. The only reason the hick has become a green energy advocate is because he thinks he can make a buck off of it.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 10:31 PM, nivekluap wrote:

    I'm a Nebraska hick and that's why I'm a Fool...to make a buck...and doing OK,tanjuberrymud :)

    KD

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 11:11 PM, Austintatious53 wrote:

    The Pickens Plan is a ruse whereby Pickens aims to acquire the rights to billions of gallons of water in the Oglalla aquifer, which he will pipeline at considerable profit to cities such as Dallas/Ft. Worth.

    He has been taking about green energy for more than a year, but has done nothing more than talk about it.

    I feel sorry for all the wheat and cotton farmers out on the high plains, because he is going to leave that area a high and dry dust bowl.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2009, at 11:47 PM, tem01 wrote:

    TBonehead has never been stupid but neither has he ever been interested in doing anything but increasing his own wealth. "Green?" Not by a long shot except to get guvmint $$$ in his pocket. He knows full well that neither wind nor solar will ever be more a a few percentage points of the total energy requirements of this country. He also knows that the low-hanging fruit of guvmint largess out there today is for anyone who will say the words 'climate change' without flinching.

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2009, at 12:22 AM, DS3618 wrote:

    Just want to mention that Noah built the ark & didn't have many supporters. Turned out it was the best thing & saved his family & animals.

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2009, at 1:23 AM, docjoctoo wrote:

    Boone Pickens is pretty much the man you see and hear. He is past needing money. As he says he has all the money he ever need or will ever spend. He knows he is near the end of his life. He says what he means and means what he says.

    He is totally dedicated to getting America to lower their oil imports. He knows we have massive new natural gas reserves in the shales and he knows we can use it to power much of our big energy needs. It’s as simple as that. Later the marketplace will determine which of the other energy sources will be successful in further lowering our need for imported oil

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2009, at 9:01 AM, HHAAMMSSTTEERR wrote:

    Just read this article interviewing Mr Pickens. I am in trucking so on quick evaluation how does 350,000 18 wheelers on diesel being converted/or replace to NG make 420,000 jobs. There are not even that many people employed making big trucks and a good percentage (Freightliner and Navistar) are made in Mexico. Somebody needs to go back to the drawing board and get the numbers right before hauling out the cry that that my good idea will create more jobs.

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2009, at 9:18 AM, jscott27 wrote:

    It will cost a fairly large amount of money to convert a diesel engine to natural gas, and if I remember correctly, the natural gas versions don't have as much power.

    If oil prices are going to rise as Pickens predicts and CNG is such a better alternative, then the market will transition over to CNG on its own without government intervention.

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2009, at 11:26 AM, okiejere wrote:

    Gee folks, it sure seems to be a lot of fun to pick on a rich man. Even one that gives heavily to colleges. But speaking of and accusing some one of being or trying to be on the dole, lets, consider all the folks that have lined up for cars. I believe the price tag for that will be about 3 billion. Thats your money they want. I wonder how many dollars that will cost us per capita. "They are even destroying the clunkers so no one can receive any benefit from them." That is if we can still borrow it. Heaven help us if China decides to call our notes. How's your CHINESE?

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2009, at 12:06 AM, dereva wrote:

    Any large, short-term shift in energy sources in the US will fail.

  • Report this Comment On August 06, 2009, at 7:20 AM, mesapet wrote:

    Pickens is to energy what Trump is to gambling. I held Pickens' stock way back when. So while a lot of what he says is true, investment in him is "caveat emptor".

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 956816, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/30/2010 3:53:31 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 10,467.16 -30.72 -0.29%
S&P 500 1,101.53 -4.60 -0.42%
NASD 2,251.69 -12.87 -0.57%

Related Tickers

7/29/2010 4:02 PM
RRC $38.31 Up +0.11 +0.29%
Range Resources Co… CAPS Rating: ***
SD $5.90 Down -0.02 -0.34%
SandRidge Energy CAPS Rating: *****
SU $32.74 Up +0.92 +2.89%
Suncor Energy, Inc… CAPS Rating: ****
CHK $21.10 Down -0.02 -0.09%
Chesapeake Energy… CAPS Rating: *****
CLR $45.82 Down -0.02 -0.04%
Continental Resour… CAPS Rating: ***
DVN $62.50 Down -0.15 -0.24%
Devon Energy Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Defined-benefit plan: A defined-benefit plan is a retirement arrangement in which an eligible retired employee receives specified payouts from his former employer throughout retirement. The employer is responsible for managing the money to be able to make these pension payments, so the payouts can be reduced or eliminated if circumstances warrant.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!