5 Stocks You Love to Hate

Recs

21

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Rallying stocks over the past few months may have spooked some of the naysayers, but the shorts are still out there.

Bearish investors short individual companies when they believe that shares will head lower in the future. Betting against stocks by taking short positions -- which essentially means selling stocks you don't own, and buying them back later to zero out your account -- is a logical (yet risky) way to cash in on down markets.

A stock with heavy shorting activity isn't necessarily a bad thing. Since shorts have to buy to cover their positions, a stock can tack on some pretty beefy gains if the shorting worrywarts all head for the exits at the same time. This is called a short squeeze.

Now that the mid-September short interest data has been published by the exchanges, let's take a look at a few companies with some of the largest bearish positions as of Sept. 15.

Citigroup (NYSE: C) - 177.5 million shares sold short
After all that Citi's been through, it's finally starting to shake off the cynics. As high as the nonbeliever count may seem right now, it's a pittance compared to the whopping 1.3 billion shares of Citigroup sold short in mid-May.

A lot has happened since then. Despite the dilutive preferred share conversion, analysts see Citigroup turning a profit in 2010, compared to the a deficit they were predicting three months ago. The banking giant has also joined its panhandling peers in making moves to partly repay the government's bailout.

The banking industry is unlikely to relive the gravy days that led to its globe-rattling selloff. However, Citigroup's gradually clearing the rubble.

Ford (NYSE: F) - 111.8 million shares sold short
The sturdiest of the three stateside automakers has also been oozing confidence these days. Three months ago, analysts figured that Ford would lose a whopping $0.42 a share next year. Now those same analysts are looking for a profit of $0.09 a share for 2010. Ford's CEO is targeting 2011 as its return to profitability, but you can't blame Mr. Market for its early jump on the enthusiasm.

Ford has delivered two consecutive quarters of blowing past Wall Street's profit expectations, and that was before the "cash for clunkers" rebates lit a third-quarter fire under the industry.

Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI) - 106.5 million shares sold short
If you think the bears are encircling the satellite radio giant today, you should've been here a year ago, when 236.2 million shares were sold short.

Sirius still commands the largest volume of shares sold short of any Nasdaq-listed company, though its low share price and high share count factor into the girth of that nine-figure sum.

DirecTV (NYSE: DTV) - 83.9 million shares sold short
Short interest is at a 52-week high at DirecTV, but it's hard to justify the pessimism. The leading satellite television provider is profitable. Unlike smaller rival DISH Network (Nasdaq: DISH), DirecTV is actually growing its subscriber base during the recession.

Its valuation is more than reasonable, fetching just more than 12 times next year's projected earnings.

Over the weekend, The Wall Street Journal speculated that Verizon (NYSE: VZ) may want to acquire DirecTV. Nothing smokes out a short squeeze faster than fears of a premium buyout, even if the chatter proves bogus.

E*TRADE (Nasdaq: ETFC) - 72.4 million shares sold short
The popular discount broker had 343.8 million shares held short at the end of August, so clocking in with just 72.4 million bearish wagers two weeks later is a major improvement.

E*TRADE's recent capital-raising moves may have played a part in the disparity, but the important takeaway is that the worst may be over for the Web-based discounter. Its retail brokerage business is growing, even if many investors still can't get over its mortgage-based woes.

Tall tales of short stories
All five of these companies are in better fiscal shape than they were earlier this year. The stock prices bear that out, with Ford, Citigroup, and Sirius multiplying several times over since their springtime lows.

There may be a lot of pessimistic bets out there on these companies, but all of them have been brutally wrong since the markets began to rally in March.

There's nothing wrong with shorting a stock, provided investors have a firm grasp of the concept and a firmer conviction that the companies shorted will be less valuable in the future. In today's market, however, that trend is heading in the opposite direction.

Watch out for squeeze plays.

Take the Motley Poll

Which of these five stocks do you think is the best shorting opportunity?

“The Death of the Euro!”…Greece may seem worlds away, but be warned. What happens there next could reshape global finance and rattle your portfolio. On Mar. 22, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson heads to Greece to get the story. Follow in real time and hear how best to profit from this historic development (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 117%!). Enter email below.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz doesn't mind sifting through the unloved for a good buying opportunity. He does not own shares in any of the companies in this story. He is also part of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 2:55 PM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    It is unwise to buy/hold SIRI with pending rev-split and two violations of NASDAQ listing rules. SIRI is already under 130 days remaining to correct the 1.00 trading rule. It is unreasonable to assume SIRI would ask for more time given they already have a plan and stock holder permission to rev-split. But, Mel will make it look good, like the world is attacking him.

    NOT AT ANY PRICE - Buying SIRI low at this time with rev-split pending is just plain nuts. SIRI is a massive loser even at 10 cents. At 10 cents the rev-split to 5.00 would be 50 for 1. A recipe big devaluation.

    The bad news press release is always issued after hours. Mel loves locking up stock holders after hours. He has always released bad news after hours, every single time. So, you can not even day trade SIRI for fear of rev-split news… RISK…

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 3:05 PM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    I have seen comments here pointing people to Seeking Alpha. My two years experience with Seeking Alpha has NOT been pleasant.

    Seeking Alpha is extremely bios and will remove all comments that are negative to a stock that they support. In the case of SIRI, Seeking Alpha is the home for paid SIRI advertisers and SIRI employees.

    Additionaly, all comments that were posted warning people about SIRI and the 1.00 NASDAQ delisting rule were removed by Seeking Alpha. Nothing on Seeking Alpha can be trusted… Just the facts as we have experienced…

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 4:01 PM, cantbefoolish wrote:

    SIRIDoom, SIRI has 3.9 billion shares outstanding. If they do a 1 for 5 reverse split, there would be 780 million shares out. This means if SIRI makes 2.4 billion in revenue a year, the earnings per share would be roughly 3.08. At the new share price of $3 that would give them less than a 1 P/E. Now explain to me, what is wrong with that?

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Gregawh wrote:

    SIRIDoom clearly has an agenda and only a motley fool would follow his advise.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 4:19 PM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    I did not say rev-split is bad for SIRI. IMHO, It is bad for current stock holders. Arguably...

    I am avoiding SIRI until after all these issues are off the table.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 4:47 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    And response to all the brain dead people who voted on the poll about SIriusXM from the street.com. ZERO percent change SIriusXM files this year. ZERO.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 4:48 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    Company will be profitable next year for the first time. Not really exactly cause to jump ship, as a company with current business model. It works. Just like Sat. TV, takes time to hit the bottom line. Subs ill go up in Q3. You heard it here first. Enjoy. IMVHO of course.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 4:50 PM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    Fredlee009 Hee Haw ;) Hee Haw!!! Hee Haw!!! LOL!!!

    glad your not my broker... Hee Haw!!!

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 5:02 PM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    All this talk about next year and 50 years from now. Who cares? Do we NOT invest in stocks to make money today? One can NOT make money HOLDING a stock that is in termoil.

    Curently, SIRI is a big risk for even a over night hold. The rev-split news will most likly drop the sp. I would not want to be holding when the news is released.

    I have made great money on SIRI day trades on the 3 to 6 cent spread. I see long term value after the rev-split. But, I am avoiding at this time...

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 5:04 PM, hotkarlito wrote:

    Still not understanding why a reverse split would be bad for current holders, but ok for non-current? The example cantbefoolish makes seems reasonable and logical. Why scare everyone off without even seeing 3Q numbers or giving SIRI the chance to get over $1 over the next 6 months?

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 5:35 PM, RobertC314 wrote:

    SIRIDoom, perhaps you could explain why you are so against Sirius. You have not provided any evidence to support the "Doom" you apparently feel so strongly about, only sweeping statements about how it is a "massive loser" and "not worth 10 cents". If you have a logical argument for these statements it would be very beneficial to everyone to hear it.

    Also, in the same interest as the Fool's disclosure policy, perhaps you could enlighten us as to why you are emotionally connected to this issue enough to use a screen name that focuses on your views of single company.

    -Robert

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 5:51 PM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    Hee Haw!!! Hee Haw!!!

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 6:15 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    If i was your broker, youd have made a lot of money on sirius this year. But you were too bearish, and instead bought AIG at $60. WOW!! bad trade man. Or was it BAC at $35. Or sold C at $1 thinking it was tanking more. Thats your style Doom. Im up over 600 percent on my sirius shares. What about you? Exactly. Stick to selling popcorn at football games man.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 6:16 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    Basically its like this. If you want a long with a 2 bagger in the future, you buy this stock. You dont listen to Jim Cramer, or A basher like sirius-doom, or the street. You listen to the smart money. Go listen. Go look at the charts. Go look at there improved bottom line. They will go back to growing this year. SUck on that.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    Ive been right about this stock since Oct. when I sold shares on the way down. Since I first started unloading shares on the way down with this stock in Sept of last year, Ive been right about this stocks direction. Rebought at .07 and .12 cents, 10 cents, and havent looked back. YOu have to follow the smart money. When you learn how to do that sirius-doom, you will be a better trader. Dont worry about it, and never stop learning. You have been wrong since you advised selling out at .30 cents, and by the way, you were no where to be found when it was goin from 2.50 to .07 cents. NO WHERE. But your right this time right? LOL YOur a joke. Disappear.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Fredlee009 wrote:

    Sorry, sept. no edit

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 8:03 PM, geoslv wrote:

    SIRIDoom, I think some of your comments at seekingalpha were removed because some of your opponents made "abuse" complaints. Maybe bad moderator judgments.

    I do think your predictions about general price trend and financial fate are not reliable, but I take you seriously about the reverse split. Now I wonder if Goldman Sachs will work tomorrow to raise the price. If it falls, that's it, your predictions will be right. Someone raised the price today to .60 at the last second.

    Hotcarlito, that's not because of fundamentals but just expectations of which way investors will move the price. Just the feeling that RS creates pessimism.

    Interesting place this Motley Fool. Articles about any subject, and comments all about SIRI.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 12:51 AM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    geoslv - I would like it if Seeking Alpha had made some mistake. However, the bios deletion of all negative comments continues.

    A few of us have called Seeking Alpha only to get voice mail. We have posted conversations about the rev-split only to find all comments deleted after a few hours. Funny part is that not all of the comments are negative. Seeking Alpha is deleting anything with strong conversation about the rev-split.

    Seeking Alpha deleted all comments about the NASDAQ delisting letter and all warning.

    They have a long history of bios pro SIRI. It is ok if all you want is good news and propaganda. However, Seeking Alpha is no place to be for real stock news. IMHO.

    I am glad to have this FOOL, less bios place for true exchange of ideas... THE FOOL ROCKS!!!

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 6:40 AM, blk240 wrote:

    hi guys,

    iam new here, and last week, i bought Etrade at 1.99USD. Do you think it is a high price to pay for? and what are your target price? (Goldman have a 2.30$ for Etrade), but personally, i think it will hit 2.90 before retracing back. Iam dreaming for that to happen :)

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 9:47 AM, cantbefoolish wrote:

    Hi blk240, I sold some shares of ETFC at 2.00. Then bought those shares back at 1.80. My cost basis is 1.41, as I've done a lot of averaging down. One thing Jim Cramer is right about, is never buy in all at once. So, hope you didn't do that, because it usually retraces back to the 1.50 range. But if you bought all at 2.00, I would say just hold on to it.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 10:06 AM, cantbefoolish wrote:

    SIRIDoom, since you still can't explain why a rev split would be bad for shareholders, I'll ask you something else. Would you prefer for SIRI to succeed or fail? If you want it to fail, please tell us all why. And I'm sure you'll give an honest answer, since you're such an honest person.

    I'll tell you my holdings, if you tell me yours. I bought SIRI all the way down to .06. At that point I had somewhere in the mid 40k's of shares. Now I have over 35k shares, as I've taken some profits on the way up. My last sell was 500 shares at .68. Then just bought those shares back at .60, after the latest scare tactics by the Street.com and MotleyFool. I also bought my dad 1k shares, at .13.

    So, that should be a nice gift, when it hits $1. Okay, your turn, Doom.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 1:17 PM, CollegeAdmin wrote:

    Any reverse split will not be bad for the company. You might get an intial dip in price because it is deamed negative by the general public. But even with stock holder approval, it is not a slam dunk that SIRI will reverse split it's shares. Yes they got thier letter from NASDAQ, yes they need to become compliant, but they are well within the time line (I believe 100 days since the letter was issued, strait from DOOM! correct me if I am wrong.) I also believe they can ask for extensions. SO, why is it unreasonable to think they will wait to hit the $1? With increased earnings, continued increasing customer growth, faverable refinancing, ... just seems more positives and one negative (delisting letter). I have made money and I am making money NOW on SIRI, so your argument that if you are invested in SIRI you aren't making money now is not reasonable either. So I am still puzzled that you emphasis one aspect (the delist notice) and hint at price colusion (GS and Mel). Just Curious....

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 4:00 PM, suejimkramer wrote:

    If you're as fed up as I am about Jim cramer, Mad Money and thestreet.com slandering sirius and their attempted market manipulation tactics, call them directly at 1-561-354-4400 and ask for the man responsible. Glenn Hall editor in chief of thestreet.com. Guess what else I did. I called LUNDY LAW offices (1-866-281-8612) in Philadelphia to sue cnbc and mad money, jim cramer, and glenn hall for the pain and suffering i've been going thru since they decided to illegally slander this company. NOONE WILL STAND UP FOR YOU! THIS IS ILLEGAL! YOU CAN DO SOMETHING BECAUSE THE FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION IS OBVIOUSLY LETTING THIS HAPPEN! MAYBE I WON'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE, BUT AT LEAST I'M TRYING! Siri will skyrocket tomorrow when the third quarter earnings come out and the motleyfool, street.com, glenn hall and jim kramer will all eventually pay for their slander and market manipulation tactics. Good luck with your stocks, I'm still happy with mine.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 4:11 PM, cantbefoolish wrote:

    suejimkramer, I wrote this email to the SEC yesterday:

    Hi, I want to inform you of two investment websites that I believe are trying to manipulate the share price of Sirius/XM (SIRI).

    One is TheStreet.com. They released this misleading article today: http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/story/10603793/1/sirius-xm-h...

    The other is MotleyFool.com. They've posted many misleading articles about SIRI. Here's one, going back to March 4, 09: http://www.fool.com/investing/high-growth/2009/03/04/the-pre...

    Both of these websites post the links on Finance.Yahoo.com, where many people can view them, and investors may be swayed to trade the stock based on this misinformation. So, I would highly recommend that you investigate the practices of these two companies. Thank you.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 4:19 PM, cantbefoolish wrote:

    In the meantime, if nothing is done to stop this - what we can do, is keep buying on the dips. Use these misleading posts as buying opportunities and make them eat their words.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2009, at 6:23 PM, geoslv wrote:

    SIRIDoom, I am getting the impression that making abuse complaints at seekingapha does easily result in removal, and maybe of more than just that one post. I wonder if it's just computerized, or any person there judges it. May not be smart.

    Anyway, other comments: The Street only published a POLL on what was "most likely" to fail out of a list. Means little, is not slanderous, is not criminal. But are there secret motivations ...?

    Today I think SIRI stock is manipulated. Ain't gonna reach $1 before a split. Do you think they want the price much lower for a split?

  • Report this Comment On September 30, 2009, at 7:58 AM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    Many things could be slanderous and today’s media truly is agenda motivated. I do not see the POLL by thestreet.com being investigated by the SEC. The SEC complaints are a waist of time. The SEC could not ketch the flue and is very unlikely to investigate anything without a congressional mandate.

    I was surprised that thestreet.com and others did not cover the NASDAQ delisting issue. The media gave SIRI a much needed pass on delisting news that could have been devastating to SIRI. I expected the media to slam SIRI with endless news on the delisting issue. Now, I am expecting the media to slam SIRI when the rev-split ratio is announced. Who knows what the media will be covering, not covering, or propagandizing.

    Yes, I also believe stocks are being manipulated. I see computer flash trading as the big manipulation tool of the FED. They are pumping the market with our tax money. Because the big guys have been given a license to flash trade, they freely profiteer without investigation. If you pay for Level 3 data feed, you can see 3 share trades bouncing back and forth for 0.0001 cents gain per trade. Millions of 3 share 0.0001 trades all day is truly NOT human trading. But, you can NOT get the SEC to investigate because the already know and have been told it is needed to improve the economy. IMHO … My Hypothesis…

    Some say SIRI was killed by short selling. The shorts heavily effected SIRI just after the merger with Goldman Sachs financing.

    The truth about the shorting and why it has not been stopped is that a large part of the original short position is only a guarantee hedge that is held by one company. Goldman Sachs opened a large short position to guarantee the original SIRI merger financing loan. Goldman Sachs was provided a guarantee of unissued SIRI shares and then used the guarantee to borrow shares to short a hedge on the loan. The SEC investigated, then they investigated again, and then on congressional mandate motivated by the movie “Stock Shock” the SEC investigated again. The SEC found no problem with Goldman Sachs Shorting SIRI.

    IF you can make a friend inside the FED or Goldman Sachs, you can make millions. That is how our congressman do it… IMHO

  • Report this Comment On September 30, 2009, at 1:45 PM, suejimkramer wrote:

    siridoom... what is your purpose? i'm not trying to be a jerk. I genuinely don't like you or your slanderous posts. I was just curious what your motives are, as you seem to constantly be on every message board slamming sirius. so either the ceo banged your wife or you work for someone in another satellite radio company or something. Seriously, who do you represent if you don't mind me asking?

  • Report this Comment On September 30, 2009, at 1:50 PM, suejimkramer wrote:

    geoslv, i understand what you're saying but if you go to the motley fool or the street, there are polls there. when you look at them there is no evidence that anyone took the poll to begin with. every poll there indicates that the general population thinks sirius is one of the stronger penny stocks on the market. i believe motley and street produce these "polls" in order to manipulate the market. they never polled any actual people or posted voting options on their website. they just say they did and that the "gen pop" all voted to say sirius is going under. not true. on a side note... anyone know when the 3rd quarter earnings come out?

  • Report this Comment On October 03, 2009, at 2:44 AM, ErichTheRead wrote:

    People who short Citibank are called "Former Customers". Citibank will soon run out of people to cheat with bait and switch, and advertising services that they don't actually provide. They can get all the cheap government money they want for a while, but when they run out of that, the loses will continue. Unless, of course, Citibank goes back into doing the business of "Banking".

    Never buy stock in a service company that nobody wants to deal with.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 994170, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 3/20/2010 12:07:02 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 14 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 10,741.98 -37.19 -0.35%
S&P 500 1,159.90 -5.92 -0.51%
NASD 2,374.41 -16.87 -0.71%

Related Tickers

3/19/2010 4:01 PM
F $13.29 Down -0.44 -3.20%
Ford Motor Company CAPS Rating: **
SIRI $0.83 Down -0.03 -4.05%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
VZ $30.41 Up +0.11 +0.36%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
ETFC $1.57 Down -0.07 -4.27%
E*Trade Financial… CAPS Rating: ****
C $3.90 Down -0.12 -2.99%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
DISH $20.92 Down -0.40 -1.88%
Dish Networks CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Amortization schedule: Amortization schedule is a schedule that provides a breakdown of the principal and interest payments, and the amount outstanding at any given point during the amortization period.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!