Recs

16

Super-Freaky -- and Super-Smart

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

If you’re a Seinfeld fan like me, then of course you remember Jason Alexander’s character, George, who was known for asking bizarre questions. Much like George, the authors of the best-selling book Freakonomics like to focus on things most people don’t spend much time thinking about, and look for ways to make them interesting and informative.

The authors, University of Chicago economist Steven Levitt and former New York Times Magazine editor Stephen Dubner, are back with a sequel called SuperFreakonomics: Global Cooling, Patriotic Prostitutes, and Why Suicide Bombers Should Buy Life Insurance. They ask out-of-the-box questions such as: Are cows to blame for global warming? Can eating kangaroo save the planet? Is chemotherapy actually bad for cancer patients? What would happen if we could teach capuchin monkeys to use money?

Dubner stopped by Fool headquarters recently to chat about some of the stories in the new book. Here are some tidbits from his super-freakin'-cool visit to the Fool.

Global warming and agriculture
In the last chapter of the new book, the authors explore the topic of global warming. Their conclusions have caused some controversy, but first, their questions: If the Earth is getting catastrophically warmer, what’s the best way to cool it? And is carbon mitigation sufficient if cooling is the issue?

The answer they reach is that carbon mitigation in and of itself is “too little, too late, too optimistic,” says Dubner. “… Carbon mitigation will not produce the desired result of cooling the earth.”

Not everyone agrees, of course, but the reason Dubner cites is this: “Carbon dioxide has about a 100-year half-life in the atmosphere … [so] the carbon dioxide that’s in the air already is going to be there for several generations.”

What’s more, contrary to popular belief, Dubner says, the agricultural sector emits more greenhouse emissions than the transportation sector. “You find that cows are much more wicked polluters than cars,” he notes. Cows, and other animals that chew their cud, emit methane, which Dubner says is 25 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

Dubner gives this example: If you buy a Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) Prius to do your part for the environment, but then you drive to the grocery store and buy some beef, you’re easily canceling yourself out.

The global-warming solution the book explores is something called geo-engineering. The idea is to replicate a volcanic explosion so large that it shoots sulfur dioxide high into the stratosphere, which rarely happens with a volcano. The sulfur would then blanket the planet, mixing with water vapor to cool the Earth. “If it’s a question of ‘How do you cool the earth?,’ we think that is a better answer than carbon mitigation,” Dubner says.

Health care and cost-cutting
Software called Amalga (which is now owned by Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) ) is practical and easy to integrate into our economy, according to Dubner. The software has created a centralized, integrated system that allows doctors in an ER to retrieve information on any given patient they’re working on in an effort to ensure the proper outcome for that patient.

“It was a revolution for emergency care, and now it’s used everywhere throughout the medical system,” Dubner says. “Now the administration wants electronic records, which would be so easy with the current system in place.”

Dubner and Levitt also found through research that the efficacy of chemotherapy in most cancers -- particularly the solid organ cancers -- is very bad, not to mention very unpleasant and costly. “If you look at Medicare, you find that 20% of Medicare patients are involved in cancer care, but 40% of the budget goes to chemotherapy,” said Dubner. “And most of that isn’t doing much good if at all.”

Buy, sell, or hold the Kindle?
Dubner gives the future of Amazon’s (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) Kindle a “late buy.” He says the economics of the eBook are still shaking out. For instance, Barnes & Noble (NYSE: BKS  ) just launched its new reader, the Nook. However, Dubner concludes that “market share is increasing. I think eBook share will rise a lot.”

For related freaky Foolishness:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor Jennifer Schonberger owns shares of Microsoft, but does not own shares of any of the other companies mentioned in this article. Microsoft is an Inside Value recommendation. Amazon is a Stock Advisor pick. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 02, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Tastylunch wrote:

    "Their conclusions have caused some controversy,"

    It's not their conclusions that has angered people, it's their lack of basic fact checking and misrepresentations of scientific work and quotes. They did a very sloppy job.

    Whatever their conclusions are legitimate or not, they have acted borderline unethically reaching them.

  • Report this Comment On November 02, 2009, at 10:20 PM, greenfyre wrote:

    Tastylunch is quite correct in that it is NOT that "Their conclusions have caused some controversy,", but rather that the chapter in question is error ridden nonsense ... you can find many articles vivisecting the book and documenting the numerous errors, distortions, and misrepresentations here:

    FAIL: Superfreakonomics

    http://leftasanexercise.simulating-reality.com/?p=90

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1028448, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/14/2012 10:12:28 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,824.58 -49.46 -0.38%
S&P 500 1,347.50 -4.27 -0.32%
NASD 2,925.92 -5.47 -0.19%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 9:31 AM
MSFT $30.33 Down -0.05 -0.16%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ***
TM $79.85 Up +0.94 +1.19%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ***
AMZN $191.59 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
BKS $13.05 Down -0.21 -1.58%
Barnes & Noble, In… CAPS Rating: *

Advertisement