Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Does Microsoft Even Care About Wireless Anymore?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Ever since Palm (Nasdaq: PALM  ) caught the company off-guard more than a decade ago with its popular PDAs running Palm OS, it's been a cliche to talk about how Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) needs to revamp its "wireless strategy." And in the ensuing years, we've seen Bill Gates & Co. respond by trotting out one awkward, slightly buggy PDA/smartphone operating system after another. While the names of the operating systems have changed, they've all been duds in terms of appealing to consumers on a large scale.

For a short while during the middle of the decade, it did look as if Microsoft might become a success in the smartphone space, as Windows Mobile, in spite of its flaws, gained market share at the expense of the outdated Palm OS. But then came the runaway success of Research In Motion's (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) BlackBerries, which, with their legions of email addicts, quickly became the world's leading corporate smartphone platform. And after that, of course, came Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) iPhone, and Microsoft's official designation as a smartphone also-ran.

But even for an also-ran, things have gotten pretty ugly for Windows Mobile as of late. Gartner recently estimated that while global smartphone shipments grew by 13% annually in the third quarter, Windows Mobile shipments declined by 20%. That brought Windows Mobile's smartphone market share down from 11.1% to 7.9%. All the while, RIM and Apple's shares grew to 20.8% and 17.1%, respectively. And even worse, it doesn't look as if Microsoft is doing much to halt the free-fall.

Microsoft, of course, will flatly deny this. The company will point to the recent release of Windows Mobile 6.5, which improves upon the operating system's clunky user interface. But the interface still pales in comparison to the ones developed by Apple, RIM, and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) for their smartphone platforms. Which helps explain why HTC, the world's largest Windows Mobile smartphone maker (these days, a distinction on part with being the world's largest VCR manufacturer), continues to rely on its proprietary TouchFLO interface instead. You'd think that the world's biggest software company could do better.

Likewise, you'd expect the world's biggest software company to develop a better Web browser for its smartphone OS than Pocket Internet Explorer, whose shortcomings have led HTC to ship devices with a third-party browser from Opera. And you'd expect it to develop a better media player than Windows Media Player Mobile, whose capabilities are easily outclassed by third-party apps such as CorePlayer. That is, unless the company decided that it's not worth investing the resources needed to become competitive.

On one level, I think this attitude from Microsoft is understandable. For a company that reported over $58 billion in revenues during its last fiscal year, the licensing fees it gets from Windows Mobile must feel like chump change. But with consumers increasingly using their phones to do things that they once only did on their PCs, being a nobody in the smartphone world can't be good over the long haul for Microsoft's brand and mindshare -- especially with its biggest PC industry competitor, Apple, also being a smartphone leader.

Microsoft is probably aware of all this, hence its rumored interest in buying RIM. But unless RIM's price tag comes down considerably, that move seems pretty unlikely. Which means that we can expect little more from Microsoft in the smartphone world than some half-hearted software "upgrades," and more exasperated comments from Steve Ballmer in which he wonders how it all went wrong.

Fool contributor Eric Jhonsa has a four-year love-hate relationship with Windows Mobile phones. He has no position in any of the companies mentioned. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Apple is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. Microsoft is a Motley Fool Inside Value selection. Motley Fool Options has recommended a diagonal call on Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2009, at 3:41 PM, miteycasey wrote:

    I"m the owner of a Palm 750W.

    Hate it.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2009, at 7:15 PM, tgauchat wrote:

    @InfoThatHelp: Doesn't it make sense that buying RIMM would give MSFT huge inroads into the lost business market? I know of many corporations that _insist_ Blackberry's be the only smartphone because of their (perceived?) security and management infrastructure.

    MSFT would benefit greatly from ... buying out this perception.

  • Report this Comment On November 17, 2009, at 7:20 PM, tgauchat wrote:

    I think MSFT could benefit greatly by buying RIMM for it's market share -- i.e., the immense corporate market which currently constrains its employees to Blackberry's for their (perceived?) security and manageability.

    WinMo targets this market, but has lost to RIMM.

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2009, at 7:44 AM, steveballmer wrote:

    You people have it all wrong! Microsoft actually has the leading edge software! Wait for the ZunePhone people!

  • Report this Comment On November 18, 2009, at 3:28 PM, exeter17 wrote:

    Blackberry's be the only smartphone because of their (perceived?) security and management infrastructure.


    As a Sysadmin and BES admin I can lock the heck out of a BB. I cannot do the same with the Iphone or WinMO using Active Synch.

    Try, the BES is a lot more expensive than using the free Active Synch, but the BES service connection is a LOT less load on my Exchange server and I have a LOT more control and much less chatty synch traffic using the BB and BES.

    So, I respectfully submit for tight business policies that the BB/BES infrastructure IS superior.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1045910, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/25/2016 6:56:12 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,169.27 -53.76 -0.30%
S&P 500 2,143.16 -8.17 -0.38%
NASD 5,283.40 -26.43 -0.50%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/25/2016 4:00 PM
MSFT $60.99 Down -0.01 -0.02%
Microsoft CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $118.25 Up +0.60 +0.51%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
BBRY $7.27 Down -0.08 -1.09%
BlackBerry CAPS Rating: *
GOOGL $828.55 Down -7.19 -0.86%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****
PALM.DL2 $5.69 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Palm CAPS Rating: *