I have a bone to pick, and a conceptual bubble to pop.
George Soros is at it once again, sparking fear and uncertainty among the less committed holders of gold. Following up on his January declaration that gold is "the ultimate asset bubble," the billionaire investor and philanthropist Soros elaborated with the caveat that "it may go higher." With the sort of verbiage that can turn hesitant buyers into hapless sellers, he added: "But it's certainly not safe and it's not going to last forever."
The ultimate conceptual bubble
If there's one notion relating to gold that I observe most unnecessarily confounding the prospective precious metal investor, it's this useless application of the word bubble in reference to gold. By my reckoning, the only time that word becomes helpful is when an asset class soars over time in the absence of a discernable fundamental basis for the move.
For example, the primary basis for soaring U.S. home prices before 2007 was a derivative-based scheme for unchecked leverage and fictional risk assessment that effectively removed that market from its underlying fundamental drivers. Housing, then, provides a textbook example of an asset bubble that that represented true peril ... and one that I have argued will continue popping for some time yet.
There may come a time when I will become comfortable applying the term to gold, but not before the identifiable fundamental drivers for higher gold prices fail to continue accumulating. Somewhere north of my $2,000 price target for gold -- which incidentally is shared by Soros' former business partner Jim Rogers -- we may eventually witness a dramatic spike that could render new investment in gold an exercise in dangerous and untimely speculation. But until those cows come home, I will reassure gold investors that we are a very long way removed from the inception of a final blow-off phase for gold's multi-year bull market run.
Why Soros has more gold than you do
Small-fry investors like you and me are at a big-enough disadvantage to the big-money crowd as it is, so Soros Fund Management's massive increase in gold exposure (revealed shortly after the legend's initial bubble declaration earlier this year) caused understandable consternation among those whose confidence in gold had been rattled by his comments.
The fund still holds 5.24 million shares of the SPDR Gold Trust
- "Gold is the only actual bull market currently. It just made a new high yesterday. In the present circumstances that may continue."
- "When I see a bubble, I buy that bubble, because that's how I make money."
With that first statement, uttered earlier this month, I can offer only my heartfelt agreement. Bravo! As for the second, we are thrust into the conclusion that Mr. Soros views bull markets and bubbles as virtually synonymous. This is where he and I run into a brick wall of disparate definitions. When I see a bubble, I want no part of it -- because that's how I protect my money. I perceived the mother of all credit-driven bubbles developing throughout the financial system years before the collapse unfolded, and that is what led me to gold nearly six years ago.
The safest places for new money
Whether they're locking in profits from recent gains in broader equities, or fleeing wisely from the true bubble that is the market for U.S. Treasury bonds, I sense that many of my fellow Fools are at a loss to identify asset classes in which they feel confident allocating fresh capital. Aside from reminding investors that cash can be an important tool in a high-volatility environment, and with the caveat that allocation strategies must be carefully tailored to suit each individual's unique circumstances, I wish to dispel the notion proposed by Soros that gold does not represent a safe investment at this point in time.
Gold is highly unpredictable in the short-term. It is prone to sudden, gut-wrenching corrections that have burned their fair share of uncertain retail investors over recent years. In order to avoid selling into weakness in a fit of panic, successful gold investors must possess a strong and disciplined long-term outlook on the multi-year trend under way.
With the $1,000 price level offering what Marc Faber and I both consider a cement floor beneath gold prices to last for the remainder of this secular trend, I would argue downside risk in gold under the prevailing macroeconomic climate is limited. The upside potential, meanwhile, remains subject to the likely exacerbation of impairment to the world's two major reserve currencies over the years to come.
Fortunately for newcomers, the Motley Fool community is packed with investors who have accrued valuable experience assessing the pros and cons of individual gold stocks. Major producer Goldcorp
So don't avoid gold just because George Soros' bubble-talk leaves you feeling uncertain; simply shape your allocation accordingly. You can skip the "only actual bull market" if you wish, but I don't recommend it.