This Shale Play Offers Shelter From the Deepwater Storm

Last week, we saw Chevron (NYSE: CVX  ) snap up Atlas Energy (Nasdaq: ATLS  ) , a natural gas producer focused on the prolific Marcellus shale. I suggested that this purchase was a smart, opportunistic move, as the rest of the industry scrambles for onshore oil plays.

The acquisition should prove shrewd in time, but there may be another motivating factor guiding Chevron here: a suddenly constrained opportunity set in North America, given the permitting situation in the Gulf of Mexico.

As I've pointed out in recent weeks, uncertainty reigns when it comes to the outlook for offshore exploratory drilling. Whereas ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM  ) took the plunge with XTO Energy, and Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A  ) made a major move of its own, Chevron had been one of the real holdouts when it came to onshore resource plays, focusing more on deepwater exploration around the world. Major delays in getting new wells approved by federal regulators could really throw a wrench in the company's outsized U.S. deepwater program. I wonder whether Chevron would be diving into the Marcellus today if the deepwater situation were not in disarray.

What got me thinking about this was a comment by Newfield Exploration (NYSE: NFX  ) management yesterday, in announcing a 50,000-acre, $405 million Marcellus acquisition from EOG Resources (NYSE: EOG  ) . Newfield, which entered the play through a partnership with Hess last year, said that it's deferring exploratory drilling in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico next year, thereby reallocating $70 million in spending from the Gulf to Appalachia.

This revelation by Newfield, one of the more active independents in the deepwater, indicates that it's possible we'll see a significant pullback in offshore exploratory budgets next year. Not all companies are holding back, however. Nexen (NYSE: NXY  ) has committed to reigniting its exploratory program next year, with six wells planned. We'll need to keep an eye on other companies as they unveil their 2011 budgets.

The controversy surrounding hydraulic fracturing makes operating in the Marcellus no walk in the park, but compared with the dysfunctional regulatory scene in the Gulf of Mexico today, Pennsylvania looks like a quite palatable place to deploy capital. I can hardly blame Chevron or Newfield for making the move from choppy waters to solid ground.

Chevron is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Toby Shute doesn't have a position in any company mentioned. Check out his Motley Fool CAPS profile or follow his articles using Twitter or RSS. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Fool owns shares of ExxonMobil and has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 01, 2010, at 11:19 AM, CarolinaMatt wrote:

    Hey Toby (or anyone else),

    A couple quick thoughts with a question at the bottom...

    My simple look at US natural gas goes like this.

    1) Volume is going up big time for 2 reasons. The shale technology greatly increases access to cheap supply in North America. 2) Natural gas is the fastest/safest path to cleaner energy. In North Carolina, we have seen both utilities lean toward changing coal plants to natural gas rather than cleaner coal.

    It seems that the smart and financially strong natural gas players should benefit.

    But if supply is going up a bunch and so is demand who knows if price is up from demand or down from supply.

    How would you play simple volume increase in natural gas? Companies selling tools/equipment specific to shale? Pipelines moving more volume? Or?

Add your comment.

DocumentId: 1372503, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/24/2014 1:25:39 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement