Major Vindication for Gold's Greatest Guru

He has done it again! The man who earned the nickname "Mr. Gold" after precisely calling the top of gold's previous bull market back in 1980, has just accomplished a feat that easily secures his legacy as the greatest precious-metals investor of our time.

Back in 2001, just as gold was recording a multidecade low beneath $300 per ounce, and the ancient monetary metal had been thoroughly outcast from the consciousness of financial markets, Jim Sinclair made an incredibly bold prediction. He forecast a powerful bull market for gold that would bring the price to at least $1,650 per ounce, implying about a six-fold increase from its price at the time.

In 2003, he launched Jim Sinclair's MineSet, a website to host his daily commentary on gold and the key developments underpinning this ongoing secular bull market. Over time, the site developed a broad following among investors with exposure to gold. While his role as chairman of Tanzanian Royalty Exploration (AMEX: TRX  ) remained his top priority, his persistent supply of insight into the gold market helped to steady the hands of gold investors as they confronted bouts of excruciating volatility and incessant calls for a collapse in gold prices.

I know that my own journey of investment in precious metals owes a portion of its success thus far to Sinclair's unflappable vision of $1,650 gold as a foregone conclusion based upon a fully vindicated perspective of the macroeconomic landscape. Now, that's not to say I adopted his perspectives on gold directly like an unquestioning disciple. To the contrary, I soon became frustrated by his insistence upon attaching specific timelines to certain forecasts; most notably when he became convinced gold would reach his $1,650 target on or before Jan. 14, 2011. I shared his confidence in the target price -- even extending the mark to $2,000 for my own conservative long-term outlook -- but I remained circumspect about the precise timing.

On the other hand, I believe his broader insights into financial markets have already proved remarkably astute. Those contributions are epitomized by golden nuggets like his 12-stage formula for higher gold prices issued in 2006, or this poignant radio appearance in 2009.

The making of a gold legend
Gold's detractors like to point to the metal's decline from the 1980 peak to suggest that gold investors are likely to be left holding the bag when the metal carves a supposedly unforeseeable about-face. But try telling that to Sinclair, who ran a brokerage service at the time called the Sinclair Group of Companies, and knew precisely the implications of then-Fed Chairman Paul Volcker's aggressive campaign to raise interest rates to 20%. Sinclair sold 900,000 ounces of gold for an average price of $810 in early 1980, and walked away from the bull market with his winnings in hand.

From 1981 to 1984, Sinclair advised Hunt Oil and the Hunt family as they sought to liquidate their massive silver holdings that had played a role in silver's incredible (first) spike to $50 per ounce. Later, he served as president of the commodity-focused Sinclair Global Clearing, and also president of a derivatives firm dealing in commodities and currencies. Perhaps the latter position contributed to his keen understanding of the dangers inherent in a heavily leveraged global market for derivatives, which forms a key foundation of his rather unsettling long-term macroeconomic forecast. But please, don't shoot the messenger.

The golden perspective on the future of gold
Now that history will record Sinclair's phenomenal call for $1,650 gold, issued a full decade in advance, his wildly successful participation in two consecutive bull markets for gold easily secures his legacy as gold's greatest living guru. Whatever happens from here, no one can take away that record of achievement. But what has the guy whose target has now been met been saying about the outlook for gold beyond the $1,650 mark?

Earlier this year, Sinclair quipped: "I think that my price target of $1,650 per ounce gold is going to be so low it will be considered silly." Just a couple of months ago, with gold retreating to about $1,500 per ounce, Sinclair predicted: "The drop at this time will in retrospect be seen as the foundation for gold trading not at $1,650, but rather at $5,000 an ounce."

Just this week, on the eve of his price-target's fulfillment, he offered: "Gold between $1,600 and $1,764 is deciding its new and elevated role in international finance." Indeed, after an entire decade of gains for the oft-maligned metal and the routinely ridiculed community of gold investors, the ancient currency is finally reasserting its rightful place on the world's financial stage. So far in 2011, emerging-market central banks have already added $10 billion of gold collectively to their foreign exchange reserves .

Based in part upon the valuable insights into the gold market that I have gleaned over the years from Sinclair, I remain confident that $2,000 gold is likewise a foregone conclusion. Some of my colleagues may consider it the height of arrogance to project a forward price target for gold, adding to a veritable chorus of disparaging sentiments that I have encountered over the years as a consequence of my bullish stance on gold.

Undeterred, I continue to recommend that my readers allocate some portion of their investment portfolios to gold and silver through carefully selected equities. The Central Fund of Canada (AMEX: CEF  ) remains the insiders' choice for one-stop bullion exposure to both gold and silver. Speaking of silver, even though Silver Wheaton (NYSE: SLW  ) has already advanced more than 1,400% since I pleaded with Fools to take notice at $2.51 per share in 2008, I still expect the stock to reach $100 before the precious-metals bull market loses steam. Even at these record-high prices, low-cost gold producers Goldcorp (NYSE: GG  ) and Yamana Gold (NYSE: AUY  ) continue to trade at substantial discounts to my assessments of fair value. I believe AuRico Gold (NYSE: AUQ  ) has its golden ducks in a row, and Rubicon Minerals (AMEX: RBY  ) recently scored a new lease on life with a transformational strategic partnership.

The process of selecting the best precious-metals vehicles is a crucial one, but not nearly as crucial as the decision to seek some exposure in the first place. I believe the greatest risk relating to gold that investors currently face, is the risk of missing out on the powerful upside moves still to come. With that final point, I trust Jim Sinclair would wholeheartedly agree.

Fool contributor Christopher Barker can be found blogging actively and acting Foolishly within the CAPS community under the username TMFSinchiruna. He tweets. He owns shares of AuRico Gold, Central Fund of Canada, Goldcorp, Rubicon Minerals, Silver Wheaton, and Yamana Gold. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (9) | Recommend This Article (44)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 04, 2011, at 5:33 PM, xetn wrote:

    I don't know what the term "guru" means except maybe "lucky". There have been all kinds of predictions regarding the future "price" of gold, so over $10000. Who knows?

    I do know one thing that will continue to propel the upward movement of gold (price wise). That one thing is the world-wide war to devalue every single currency buy creating new money units at the click of a central banker's mouse. This can easily be confirmed by going to Kitco.com, clicking on a chart in any of the listed currencies, and you will find that gold has risen over the past several years. Here is one example for 4 currencies:

    http://www.the-privateer.com/chart/g-multi.html

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2011, at 2:47 PM, ergotoo wrote:

    Well, so far Sinclairs baby, TRX has performed like a loser. Gold going into orbit, most gold shares performing quite well, yet TRX shares keep getting weaker and weaker. Why???

    Something is very very, wrong, here.

    New buying interest has largely dried up. TRX just keeps tripping over its own feet, and spitting in its shareholders faces.

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2011, at 4:22 PM, XMFSinchiruna wrote:

    ergotoo,

    TRX has doubled over the past two years. It's 5-year performance is identical in result to NXG, which is presently my top pick for gold. Its longer-term trajectory is entirely typical of the industry for pre-production exploration companies. Nothing about its past performance conveys anything about there being "something wrong".

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2011, at 6:18 PM, XMFSinchiruna wrote:

    xetn,

    It defies logic to attribute a 40-year career marked by peerlessly successful navigation of the only two secular bull markets for gold within that timespan to "luck".

    Sure, there have been all kinds of predictions about the price of gold, but none as successful as Mr. Sinclair's.

  • Report this Comment On August 05, 2011, at 9:35 PM, xetn wrote:

    TMFSinchiruna:

    It defies logic that you believe anyone can tell the future.

  • Report this Comment On August 07, 2011, at 10:43 AM, XMFSinchiruna wrote:

    xetn,

    I understand some prefer to remain agnostic with respect to forecasting trends. If that works for you, I'm glad. I personally could not remain relaxed as an investor without drawing conclusions regarding the most likely macroeconomic scenarios ahead. It's been working for me so far.

  • Report this Comment On September 17, 2011, at 3:13 PM, texasflyfish wrote:

    xetn,

    I believe the appropriate rebuttal is: "Chance only favors the prepared mind". Louis Pasteur.

    There are lots of people willing to make predictions with very little training or understandng of the subject. Sinclair was intimately involved in the field and made predictions that were ridiculed, but he stuck with them. That generally is labeled: "visionary"

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2011, at 6:43 PM, goldminingXpert wrote:

    "Well, so far Sinclairs baby, TRX has performed like a loser. Gold going into orbit, most gold shares performing quite well, yet TRX shares keep getting weaker and weaker. Why???

    Something is very very, wrong, here."

    It's only down 70% since summer. No need to worry. The guru's got this under control. [/sarc]

  • Report this Comment On April 27, 2012, at 1:29 AM, maxbentley wrote:

    Thanks,Chris.

    Jim gives of himself and asks nothing.

    He foots the bill for his website and puts himself out there every day on international issues and of course,that of finance.

    His life is a myriad of who's who and he gives us his vast insights into highest level finance, international politics and diverse issues and interests such as gardening / self sufficiency.

    He is an absolute gift to have as constant assurance in the PM markets and as a beacon of insight into the world's bankers and elites through his endeavours and experiences.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1532890, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 8/28/2014 11:42:06 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement