Watch stocks you care about
The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...
Your own personalized stock watchlist!
It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...
I think I should do a Ph.D. thesis on the correlation between companies that drive consumers crazy and stock returns. For me, it seems like the more I hate paying a bill, the better a company does.
But maybe I shouldn't be surprised by such a revelation, because needing a company does have a correlation to profits. Warren Buffett called it a "competitive moat," but it's really just a power over consumers that we can't break free from. Whether we want to get rid of them, they just won't go away.
Here are three companies I can't stand, with stocks that are very compelling.
Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT )
I've been an admitted convert to everything Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL ) for the last three years, and I can tell you I don't miss Microsoft at all. But even now, Microsoft haunts my daily life.
Microsoft is nice enough to make Office for Mac but mean enough to leave me unable to use all of its features correctly on a Mac.
A Microsoft database product I use every day lets me access pages but not upload files unless I'm using Internet Explorer. And IE9 is only available for Windows Vista and Windows 7, thank you very much.
As much as I can't stand Microsoft, I love it as an investment. The stock trades at under 10 times trailing earnings, pays a 3.1% dividend, and still has an incredible $39.5 billion of cash and short-term investments net of long-term debt. And my comments above show just how wide Microsoft's competitive moat is. Even with all of Apple's success, it isn't about to dethrone Microsoft as the maker of the go-to operating system for businesses and most consumers.
Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA )
There's nothing I loathe more than paying Comcast $100 every month for cable and Internet. Xfinity has been a huge disappointment that made my TV look older than it was before the "upgrade."
But what option do I have? For Internet, a 3G or 4G hotspot from Verizon or AT&T (NYSE: T ) ends up being more costly for those of us who live on the Internet, because bandwidth is limited and service is slower.
I would love to drop cable TV, but Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX ) doesn't have enough streaming content to make that a reality, and other online sources only have limited content. Watching sports without cable? Forget about it.
So I'm stuck. Where I live, Comcast is my only cable option, and I can't live (maybe a slight exaggeration) without Internet and sports. And that's exactly what makes a great investment. I think that despite some recent cord-cutting, people will still rely on cable companies in the long run for television and Internet access. We're still years away from having the kind of wireless bandwidth needed to eliminate them all together.
Crocs (Nasdaq: CROX )
If you wear the classic Crocs when in public with your children, there's only one thing I know for certain. They're embarrassed to be seen with you.
Crocs have quickly moved from cute and fashionable to "Dad, are you seriously wearing those with shorts and socks?"
But as crazy as I think the Crocs fad is, the stock has never been better, climbing 62% so far in 2011 and 114% over the past year. The company's sales have grown at a 35% clip over the past five years, shares trade at a reasonable 16 times forward earnings, and the shoemaker is updating its lineup with new styles.
I'm more of a Nike or Under Armour (NYSE: UA ) guy myself, but based on those three metrics, Crocs looks like a better buy than both.
I don't understand Crocs, I may never wear Crocs, but it's tough to say the stock is a bad buy right now.
I'm left scratching my head
Sometimes stocks just don't make any sense. The companies we love to hate may be just the investments we need to make.
What stock do you love from a company you can't stand? Leave your pick in our comments section below.
RSS Headlines
Fool UK
Comments from our Foolish Readers
Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the
Report this Comment icon found on every comment.
Report this Comment On September 28, 2011, at 5:12 PM, Lostnconfused wrote:
That's why I think you are a bit behind times when it comes to CROX. The old thinking of plastic clogs is just that "old". Those styles are for knocking around the house and wearing around the pool. The new styles are very fashionable and that is in part why the company has come back from the brink.
Report this Comment On September 28, 2011, at 6:40 PM, RickRickert4MVP wrote:
Crox aren't "fashionable". You'll never see crox downtown on a friday or saturday night. I'll wear Uggs before I wear Crox.
Report this Comment On September 28, 2011, at 7:50 PM, hbofbyu wrote:
I hate all the stocks that burned me in the tech bubble of 2000.
Mainly JDSU and Cisco who will never in my lifetime reach their previous valuations - whereas companies like IBM and Amazon have recovered.
By the way, if you wear Crox and you are over the age of 12 you should just say "to hell with everything" and complete the outfit with a velvet spandex jumpsuit.
Report this Comment On September 28, 2011, at 9:51 PM, midnightmoney wrote:
As my 4-year-old crox-wearing niece would say to her crox-wearing mother and father around the pool, "blah-blah-blah". At best. I wear crox. I'm 42. And I'm cool.
Report this Comment On September 29, 2011, at 9:12 AM, jvgfool wrote:
Travis, in time, I think you'll learn to love MSFT. Microsoft is an enterprise company that has more potential to grow. Apple competes in the commodity market. Apple shares will go down in time. This has been played out before.
Report this Comment On September 29, 2011, at 12:21 PM, peytie1 wrote:
Crox are the first politically neutral closed toe sandal and since too many men do not make their toe nails pretty they can only wear closed toe sandals even around the house lest their own dog would stop wanting to be aroudn them.
Plus have you ever tried to walk around in "flip flops"? It actually take effort. You have to lift up your heal and that stupid little cord between your big toe and the next becomes down right un comfortable and maybe full of bacteria? So the practically factor of Crox for men is beyond cool... it's practical. Of course no one would wear crox on a Friday night on the town. But they would not wear Under Armour shorts/sweats/shirt either.
Being cool is over rated. Maybe it's lack of testosterone by really don't care about being cool. And sometimes that in itself can be cool. My girl friends 15 year old daughter told me I looked "cute" in my bright orange(go Vols) Crox. I am 43 and I lost the being cool obsession a long time ago and I love my crox plus they are sanitary and unlike Berks people don't automatically assume I am "wild eyed tree hugging liberal". In that respect crox are kind of like the Canada T shirt I would wear if I ever traveled to the middle east.
Report this Comment On October 01, 2011, at 8:52 AM, Lostnconfused wrote:
For all you Crox haters, how many of you wear flip flops? Be honest. You think that is cool.
Add your comment.