Say Hello to Hollywood's New Serial Killer

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

We've known for a while that Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) has a sense of humor. The company's April Fool's jokes have become about as legendary as our own. But timing? The company that kept Gmail in beta for years and released the Honeycomb tablet operating system before it was ready to make a serious run at the iPad has never been known for timing.

That may finally be changing. Last week, just as the fall TV season was starting to gather steam, the Big G announced plans that could disrupt every major cable and satellite provider, and possibly some of the big studios as well.

A better YouTube
Specifically, the search specialist said in a blog post that it is planning upwards of 100 new channels for broadcasting original content across a variety of categories. The Wall Street Journal subsequently cited anonymous sources who say Google has committed roughly $100 million in advance payments to create the channels.

Several A-list stars are involved, the Journal says, including Madonna, Jay-Z, Two And a Half Men star Ashton Kutcher, Rainn Wilson of The Office, and Sofia Vergara of Modern Family. Each channel will feature its own programming lineup to be broadcast exclusively on YouTube for 18 months. Producers are to take in 55% of ad revenue after Google recoups upfront payments, the Journal reported.

Imagine what this means for the likes of Cablevision (Nasdaq: CVC  ) , Comcast (Nasdaq: CMCSA  ) , DirecTV (Nasdaq: DTV  ) , and DISH Network (Nasdaq: DISH  ) . Consumers who've long wondered whether paying upwards of $100 to $200 a month for live programming might question the need for the portals they've begrudgingly come to rely upon.

But that's sugarcoating it. Eight of the top nine cable providers lost an average of 200,000 subscribers in the second quarter. I'll be surprised if Q3 data is much different. Time Warner Cable has already said it lost 128,000 residential video subscribers in the third-quarter.

More Dexter than Michael Meyers
Meanwhile, ABC, CBS (NYSE: CBS  ) , and NBC will now face a fight for the hundreds of billions in TV ad revenue that flows to them as YouTube grows to be a network in and of itself. There's also a history of having infighting work in Google's favor. Cablevision and Fox failed to negotiate channel rights last year at this time. What happens when YouTube offers an alternative wherein carrying rates could be cheaper? Studios and distributors -- both of which could lose as YouTube gains -- could go to war with each other as Google waits on the sidelines.

We're still early in the process of YouTube's process of funding unique content over the Web. We don't know how good it will be. We don't know whether viewers' attachment to the television and known TV brands will make a difference, but I sense that the disruption here is bigger than most of Hollywood would like to believe.

Why? Consider where YouTube is. You can get it on any iOS or Android device. That includes everything from Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) TV to Google's own set-top boxes to iPads, Android tabs, and tens of millions of smartphones. Distribution that television networks have long dreamed of -- distribution that could appreciably increase the available advertising pie -- would fall first to YouTube and its partners and Hollywood second. Reversals of fortune don't get more dramatic than that.

Going with the Halloween theme, it may be instructive to think of this new and improved YouTube as more like Dexter than Michael Meyers. The Showtime serial killer doesn't hunt innocents, but other serial killers. A bad guy who also happens to be a good guy -- if, that is, you buy the notion that good guys can also be cold-blooded killers. Happy Halloween, Hollywood. Enjoy it while you still can.

Now it's your turn at the podium. Do you believe the new YouTube will become a disruptive force? Please weigh in using the comments box below. Or if you'd prefer to avoid the risk of investing in ever-shifting industries such as media and entertainment while also boosting your returns, I recommend The Motley Fool's new special report, which features 11 top-performing dividend stocks. Get your copy now -- it's 100% free.

Fool contributor Tim Beyers is a member of the Motley Fool Rule Breakers stock-picking team. He owned shares of Apple and Google at the time of publication. Check out Tim's portfolio holdings and Foolish writings, or connect with him on Google+ or Twitter, where he goes by @milehighfool. You can also get his insights delivered directly to your RSS reader.

The Motley Fool owns shares of Google and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Google and Apple and creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (2)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 7:59 PM, demodave wrote:

    I dunno. I, personally, have an investment stake in AAPL, but I honestly just don't see Google getting there before Apple with the major labels. I'll admit, though, that I occasionally 'Tube searches for music videos and so on. I just don't necessarily believe that the content has the blessing of the original producer/performer to be on UTube. Given the difficulties I have heard of (mostly from amateurs, but nonetheless) in dealing with the Radio Industry Association of America, I would think that this is not an easy line to breach.

  • Report this Comment On November 01, 2011, at 10:24 AM, TheSaaSGuy wrote:

    I am excited about the changes in the paytv / premium video space. I think $GooG is aiming to make YouTube the leader in long-form content serving the long-tail. Given their successful past of disrupting media advertising models (recall newspapers?), I am sure they will hack at TV ad rev.

  • Report this Comment On November 01, 2011, at 11:20 AM, akakroke wrote:

    Oh yes Tim, an excellent article just as I logged in to see where DISH stock was this morning and pondered buying some.

    YouTube was the smartest thing Google ever did and while I refuse to use their search engine due to privacy and security issues (see I always use YouTube.

    Here's my only problem: bandwidth. Streaming requires truly powerful servers and lots of them and after that, there is the bandwidth problem, or limitations.

    To date I've not seen/experienced a consist delivery system for streaming and until that occurs, I do not believe anything will replace DVD media (as in CSTR, Blockbuster) and the television most especially as we come to expect blu-ray quality and 1080i HD pictures (and I'm not even going to mention 3D).

    A great article! Keep up the good work!!!


  • Report this Comment On November 01, 2011, at 9:52 PM, dgcruzing wrote:

    in reply to akakrokeo

    I think you need to take a look at some of the Chinese streaming TV sites/programs..

    PPTV, Dopool, PPS all come to mind. I am using them constantly here in China for my source of television do millions of viewers per night..

    Understanding of course it is a bandwidth thing but usually at 45k-100k download speeds it still buffers fine..

    so I say the Model is there already for Google to be successful with this venture.. The key of course is breaking the hold of the big media players, which will come as Independence from their funding of programs will draw talented interdependent producers to produce programs that people want to watch.. i.e discovery channel is a good example of this.. if you have a good idea for a show.. you pitch it and if they like it .. off you go..

    I see this happening with the likes of Google Channels.. which then lets the market (audience) dictate what is going to be successful or not..

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1580859, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/28/2016 11:58:56 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 18,222.41 52.73 0.29%
S&P 500 2,137.63 4.59 0.22%
NASD 5,223.29 7.31 0.14%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

10/28/2016 11:43 AM
AAPL $114.96 Up +0.48 +0.41%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
CBS $57.06 Up +0.65 +1.15%
CBS CAPS Rating: ***
CMCSA $62.66 Up +1.18 +1.91%
Comcast CAPS Rating: ***
DISH $58.55 Up +0.37 +0.64%
DISH Network CAPS Rating: **
DTV.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
DirecTV CAPS Rating: ***
GOOGL $834.14 Up +16.79 +2.05%
Alphabet (A shares… CAPS Rating: *****